 Don't Miss
More at Powell's
Guests | October 20, 2009
By Vincent McCaffrey
It was in a letter of 1897, about his cousin James Ross Clemens, that Mark Twain famously noted that "the report of my death was an exaggeration." He...
Continue »
-
 |
$10.98 List price: $25.95
Sale Hardcover
Ships in 1 to 3 days
| Qty |
Store |
Section |
| 1 |
Beaverton |
Politics- Anarchism |
| 1 |
Burnside |
US History- 1920 to 1960 |
This title in other formats:
Sacco and Vanzetti: The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind
by Bruce Watson
|
|
|
|
Synopses & Reviews The riveting true story of one of the nations most infamous trials and executions.
When the state of Massachusetts electrocuted Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti on August 23, 1927, it concluded one of the most controversial legal cases in American history. In the eight decades since, debate has raged over what was probably a miscarriage of justice.
In the first full-length narrative of the case in thirty years, Bruce Watson unwinds a gripping tale that opens with anarchist bombs going off in a posh Washington, D.C., neighborhood and concludes with worldwide outrage over the execution of the good shoemaker and the poor fish peddler. Sacco and Vanzetti mines deep archives and new sources, unveiling fresh details about these nave dreamers and militant revolutionaries. This case still haunts the American imagination. Authoritative and engrossing, Sacco and Vanzetti will capture fans of true crime books and everyone who enjoys riveting American history. Review: "'Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti are among the most famous political martyrs of 20th-century America, convicted of murder by a Massachusetts jury and executed in 1929. Watson ( Bread and Roses) expertly runs through the facts of the case and the basic legal injustices perpetrated against the two men, beginning with their arrest on suspicion of a payroll robbery up to their electrocution, without agitating for either end of the political spectrum. He carefully establishes the context of anarchist terrorism that stirred public sentiment against the two admittedly radical defendants — including the judge at their trial, who made numerous prejudicial remarks outside the courtroom. Fellow radicals (and many moderate liberals) were outraged by the proceedings, but Watson observes that most Americans were too caught up in the 'amusement park' mentality of the 1920s to care about them — a conclusion slightly at odds with the passionate debate to this day over their guilt. Watson quotes extensively from Sacco and Vanzetti's letters, with their imperfect English, to flesh out their personalities (he has also written an introduction to a new Penguin Classics edition of the correspondence). 16 pages of b&w photos.' Publishers Weekly (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.) Review: "Eighty years ago this week, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts executed two first-generation immigrants from Italy, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, for crimes they almost certainly did not commit. Before and after the executions, passions aroused by the case, in the United States and around the world, were incredibly intense. In part, this was because the case had strong political overtones at ... Washington Post Book Review (read the entire Washington Post review) a time when much of the country was swept up in the Red Scare. In part, it was because, as the noted newspaper columnist Walter Lippmann wrote, 'No man ... should be put to death where so much doubt exists.' And, in part, it was because Sacco and Vanzetti were appealing men, whatever one may have thought of their politics. In an interview with the New York World three months before his execution, Vanzetti was quoted as saying, in halting but powerful English: 'If it had not been for these thing, I might have live out my life, talking at street corners to scorning men. I might have die, unmarked, unknown, a failure. Now we are not a failure. This is our career and our triumph. Never in our full life can we hope to do such work for tolerance, for justice, for man's understanding of man as we now do by dying. Our words, our lives, our pains — nothing! The taking of our lives — lives of a good shoemaker and a poor fish peddler — all! That last moment belongs to us — that agony is our triumph!' Later, according to Bruce Watson, 'the reporter admitted he had taken hasty notes and possibly enhanced them,' but that is essentially beside the point. It is only slight exaggeration to say, as Watson does, that Vanzetti's 'impromptu soliloquy became immortal.' Certainly it seemed so to me a quarter-century later when, as a teenager, I listened over and over again to the 1920s volume of Edward R. Murrow's 'I Can Hear It Now' recordings, which included a heavily accented but deeply moving recreation of Vanzetti's words. The indignation in Murrow's own voice as he summarized the details of the case was palpable and, I feel to this day, justifiable. This has nothing to do with sympathy for the anarchist beliefs that Sacco and Vanzetti espoused; those beliefs were naive, sentimental and simplistic. Rather it has to do with the rank injustice of their prosecution, conviction and execution. Because many Americans under the age of 50 probably know little if anything about this important case, with its broad and lasting implications, it is good to have Watson's account. The literature of the case is vast, but surprisingly little of it provides as balanced and unemotional a survey as this volume does. It is also a considerable improvement upon Watson's previous book, 'The Man Who Changed How Boys and Toys Were Made,' a biography of A.C. Gilbert, the inventor of the Erector Set, which told an interesting story in an uninteresting way. This time around Watson keeps his inclination toward fictionalizing in check and does solid, extensive research. He clearly sympathizes with Sacco and Vanzetti, and believes they were innocent victims of what amounted to a witch hunt, but he acknowledges that in some respects their behavior was suspect and their explanations inconsistent. Removed by eight decades from the furor, he does not succumb to the heated passions of the day, but he does convey the full extent of popular feeling. For people who need an introduction to the case, his 'Sacco & Vanzetti' will serve very well. Similar legal controversies of somewhat more recent vintage are those of Alger Hiss, who spent almost four years in federal prison after being found guilty in 1950 on two counts of perjury involving his trial on charges of being a communist, and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were found guilty of espionage and executed in 1953. All three cases took place in periods when American fears of communism and other alien political 'isms' bordered on hysteria, and all aroused virulent feelings across the political spectrum. The chief difference is that Hiss probably and the Rosenbergs almost certainly were guilty, while Sacco and Vanzetti very likely were not. The crime they were accused of committing took place in Braintree, outside Boston, in April 1920. About 'five hundred pay envelopes containing $15,776.71,' the weekly pay for a local shoe factory, were stolen, and the two men carrying the money, the paymaster and a guard, were shot to death. A 'big, boxy Buick' picked up the two gunmen and raced into the distance: 'It had all been over in a minute. One crime had been committed. One car had picked up the bandits. One bandit had fired from its passenger seat. But as the crowd began to babble, a kaleidoscope of impressions swirled around the scene.' That set the pattern for the seven years to follow. There were as many accounts of the crime as there were people to testify about it, and differences between the stories were significant. What mattered most to Sacco and Vanzetti, though, was that one of two suspicious-looking men seen in Braintree — 'smoking and speaking "a foreign language" that identified them as "Dagos"' — 'bore a striking resemblance to Nicola Sacco.' In Massachusetts at the time, that was enough. It will be difficult for today's reader to grasp, but Massachusetts in the 1920s bore little resemblance to Massachusetts today. The state that is now regarded as the epitome of liberalism and all its attendant tics was a stronghold of old Yankee conservatism: 'Between the Civil War and World War I, the Commonwealth never elected a single Democratic senator nor gave a majority of votes to a Democratic presidential candidate.' Its former governor, Calvin Coolidge, was in the White House by 1925, and Massachusetts thought that was just fine. Political conservatism went hand in hand with deep prejudice against the newer residents of what was by then 'the most ethnically diverse region of America,' and especially against Italians, who too often were pigeonholed inside the stereotype of the Mafia. So when, a couple of weeks after the Braintree murders, Sacco and Vanzetti were apprehended in questionable circumstances in nearby Bridgewater, their arrest and prosecution were foregone conclusions. Add their well-known activism in anarchist circles and that anarchists were known to have staged bomb attacks around the country, and they never had a chance. Their trial took place 'in the peaceful little town of Dedham,' under the direction of Judge Webster Thayer, who was convinced of their guilt from the outset — he told one friend that he 'would get them good and proper!' and another that they were 'anarchistic bastards' — and who gave every benefit of the doubt to the prosecution. The trial was a farce, ending in the conviction of both men: The all-male, all-white, all-Yankee jury 'reached a verdict in three hours but decided it would look hasty if announced so soon.' With that verdict began six years of what Sacco called 'this long and dolorous Calvary ... this terrible and iniquitous Bastile.' The men's lawyers tried various strategies and came up with everything from ballistics tests to witnesses with altered stories, but all were swatted down, first by Thayer, then by Massachusetts' Supreme Judicial Court and ultimately by Gov. Alvan T. Fuller, who refused all appeals for clemency. As one of their lawyers finally said, in sorrow and exasperation, the case 'is remitted to the judgment of mankind.' It has been there ever since, and arguments about what should be the correct judgment rage on to this day. The Internet is full of claims and counterclaims, declarations and speculations, to the extent that Watson must be commended for taking on a subject that is sure to bring him vilification from true believers of all viewpoints. My own view is that he has done a fair, workmanlike job, and deserves full credit for it. Jonathan Yardley's e-mail address is yardleyj(at symbol)washpost.com." Reviewed by Jonathan Yardley, Washington Post Book World (Copyright 2006 Washington Post Book World Service/Washington Post Writers Group)
(hide most of this review)Review: "Meticulously tracking their trial, Watson extensively quotes its record as he dramatizes questionable aspects of the proceeding, such as conflicting witnesses and a prejudicial judge." Booklist Review: "This careful and thoughtful volume is a valuable addition to the extensive literature on this landmark case." Christian Science Monitor Review: "Watson does a terrific job of reviewing the historical record of the trial, drawing compelling portraits of the principals, their families, and partisans on both sides of the bitter controversy." Seattle Times Synopsis: In this riveting true story of one of the nations most infamous trials and executions, Watson unveils new details in the 80-year-old case that still haunts the American imagination. 16-page b & w photo insert. About the Author Bruce Watson is an award-winning journalist whose articles have been published in Smithsonian, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, San Francisco Examiner, Yankee Magazine, and The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2003.
Product Details
- ISBN:
- 9780670063536
- Subtitle:
- The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind
- Author:
- Watson, Bruce
- Publisher:
- Viking Books
- Subject:
- United States - 20th Century/20s
- Subject:
- Murder - General
- Subject:
- United States - State & Local - New England
- Subject:
- Trials (Murder)
- Subject:
- Sacco-Vanzetti Trial, Dedham, Mass., 1921.
- Subject:
- United States - 20th Century
- Subject:
- Trials (Murder) -- Massachusetts.
- Copyright:
- 2007
- Publication Date:
- August 2007
- Binding:
- Hardcover
- Grade Level:
- General/trade
- Language:
- English
- Illustrations:
- Y
- Pages:
- 433
- Dimensions:
- 9.28x6.34x1.39 in. 1.50 lbs.
Other books you might like
-
-
-
-
-
-
Related Aisles
|
