Provides the first comprehensive review of the Corporate Social Responsibility movement in the United State and Europe. Vogel acknowledges the movement's achievements in improving labor, human rights, and environmental conditions in developing countries; but he also demonstrates that CSR's potential for significant change in corporate behavior is exaggerated.

Vogel (business ethics, Haas School of Business, U. of California at Berkeley) combines statistical analysis and case studies in his assessment of how much corporate social responsibility is encouraged or constrained by market forces (consumer demand for responsibly made products, actual or threatened consumer boycotts, challenges to a firm's reputation by non-governmental organizations, pressure from socially responsible investors, and the values held by managers and other employees). He finds that in terms of demand from consumers, employees, and investors, there is little business sense to corporate social responsibility, with the exception of a small subset of firms: firms that either have made social responsibility part of their strategy for attracting and retaining customers, employees, and investors or highly visible companies targeted by activists. He then turns from demand to supply, assessing the ability and willingness of businesses to adopt social responsibility in the areas of corporate policies toward manufacturing and agricultural workers in developing countries, corporate environmental performance, and responses to concerns about the impact of foreign investment on human rights and economic development in the developing world. In the end he argues that public regulation must be strengthened in order to encourage corporate social responsibility and that discussion of the matter must be broadened to include the role of business in shaping public policy. Annotation ©2006 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

The principles and practices of corporate social responsibility (CSR) date back more than a century, but the current wave of interest in this topic is unprecedented. This heightened attention is global and is evidenced on every conceivable measure. It is reflected in the growth of social and ethical investment funds, the dramatic increase in voluntary codes of conduct for companies and industries, and the number of companies that issue reports on their social and environmental practices and policies. Similarly, the mobilization of nongovernmental organizations to challenge a wide range of corporate environmental and human rights practices, the frequency of consumer boycotts and protests, and the number of organizations and institutions established to monitor, measure, and report on corporate social and environmental performance all demonstrate deep grassroots interest. In this book, David Vogel provides the first comprehensive, in-depth review of the contemporary CSR movement in both the United States and Europe. He presents a careful and balanced appraisal of the movements accomplishments and limitations, including a critical evaluation of the business case for CSR. While acknowledging the movements achievements, most notably in improving some labor, human rights, and environmental conditions in developing countries, he also demonstrates that CSRs potential to bring about a significant change in corporate behavior is exaggerated. The Market for Virtue explores to what extent future improvements in corporate conduct can occur without more extensive or effective government regulationin the United States, Europe, the Far East, and in the developing countries. In other words, what is thelong-term potential of business self-regulation? Vogel concludes that the amount of improvement that can be expected is far more modest than much contemporary writing on corporate responsibility has claimed. There is a market for virtue, but it is limited by the substantial costs of more responsible business behavior.

" This book is by far the most systematic and balanced analysis of corporate social responsibility as a means for firms to create social value beyond their immediate economic functions. It carefully examines not only the opportunities but also the limits of CSR in the absence of explicit regulations. The study combines sound logic with illustrative cases, and advances the sophistication of the CSR debate considerably."

— John G. Ruggie, Harvard University, co-architect of UN Global Compact