- STAFF PICKS
- GIFTS + GIFT CARDS
- SELL BOOKS
- FIND A STORE
The Homework Myth: Why Our Children Get Too Much of a Bad Thingby Alfie Kohn
Synopses & Reviews
Death and taxes come later; what seems inevitable for children is the idea that, after spending the day at school, they must then complete more academic assignments at home. The predictable results: stress and conflict, frustration and exhaustion. Parents respond by reassuring themselves that at least the benefits outweigh the costs. But what if they don't? In The Homework Myth, nationally known educator and parenting expert Alfie Kohn systematically examines the usual defenses of homework — that it promotes higher achievement, reinforces learning, and teaches study skills and responsibility. None of these assumptions, he shows, actually passes the test of research, logic, or experience. So why do we continue to administer this modern cod liver oil — or even demand a larger dose? Kohn's incisive analysis revels how a mistrust of children, a set of misconceptions about learning, and a misguided focus on competitiveness have all left our kids with less free time and our families with more conflict. Pointing to parents who have fought back — and schools that have proved educational excellence is possible without homework — Kohn shows how we can rethink what happens during and after school in order to rescue our families and our children's love of learning.
"Education watchdog and author Kohn (No Contest: The Case Against Competition) questions why teachers and parents continue to insist on overloading kids with homework when there are no definitive studies proving its overall learning benefits. Indeed, argues Kohn persuasively, homework can be detrimental to children 's development by robbing families of quality evening time together and not allowing a kid time simply to be a kid. Americans in general advocate a tough-going approach to education and push teachers to give more drudgery nightly as a way of 'building character.' Yet Kohn shows that doing forced busywork only turns kids off to school and kills intellectual and creative curiosity. The American insistence on producing good worker bees 'by sheer force or cleverness,' notes Kohn, 'reflects a stunning ignorance about how human beings function in the real world.' Kohn pursues six reasons why homework is still so widely accepted despite the evidence against it, including the emphasis on competitiveness and 'tougher standards' and a basic distrust of children and how they would fill their time otherwise if not doing busywork. There aren't enough case studies in Kohn's work, but Kohn sounds an important note: parents need to ask more challenging questions of teachers and institutions. (Sept.)" Publishers Weekly (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.)
"Do American school kids need to buckle down or loosen up? It's an old debate in education circles, argued and re-argued over everything from how children should learn math to how often — if ever — they ought to take standardized tests. Now, just in time for the back-to-school season, several writers emphatically rooted in the progressive camp are joining the fray with an assault on what they see... Washington Post Book Review (read the entire Washington Post review) as a growing menace to young minds: homework. Through tales of marred childhoods and family strife, sober research reviews and inspirational accounts of parents who have fought back against uptight educrats, they aim to demolish the notion that any good might come of asking students to take assignments home after the school bell rings. Alfie Kohn, the author of numerous volumes attacking get-tough education reforms, sympathetically enumerates the most common complaints against homework, from the burden it places on parents to the stress it causes kids. Most damning, he writes in the opening chapter entitled 'Missing Out on Their Childhoods,' homework 'may be the single most reliable extinguisher of the flame of curiosity.' Challenging the notion that homework may be a useful, if sometimes onerous, part of growing up, Kohn points out, correctly, that most research has found no association between homework and student learning in the elementary grades. And he is witheringly (albeit unconvincingly) critical of studies that indicate it is positively connected to academic achievement for middle- and high-school students. Nor does he believe homework leads to other desirable outcomes such as good study habits (one of the chief rationales cited by experts who believe it may be valuable in modest amounts for younger students). He proposes an assortment of reforms, the most striking of which would change the 'default' position of schools to a no-homework policy unless the value of a given assignment can be clearly justified. If Kohn is the would-be intellectual theoretician of a new war on homework, Sara Bennett and Nancy Kalish have written a battlefield manual for parents. While their central claims are of a piece with Kohn's (they write that 'homework overload is compromising our parenting choices, jeopardizing our children's health, and robbing us of precious family time'), this duo's approach is more practical. Employing the chatty, anecdote-driven style of women's magazines, they lay out their case (even claiming that the growing homework burden fuels childhood obesity), then spell out how to lobby schools to have it reduced or eliminated. 'Homework overload is not a parenting problem. It's a school problem that has been dumped in our laps,' write Bennett, a criminal defense appeals attorney, and Kalish, a former editor and columnist for such publications as Child and Redbook. In the grass-roots revolt they envision, more parents will say 'enough is enough.' There is no question that for some children and parents, at least some of the time, homework can be hell. Any mother or father who has ever struggled to the point of tears with a child made miserable by an inordinate workload or an inane assignment will surely identify with some of the unhappy kids and parents portrayed in these books. Consider the mother quoted by Kohn who complains that her young son, exhausted after a long school day, must continue with what amounts to 'a double shift' once he arrives home. And of course there are those maddening school projects: One section in Bennett and Kalish's book is titled 'Cardboard, Glue, and Pasta: The Homework Hall of Shame.' These writers have convinced themselves — and would have their readers believe — that excessive homework is a veritable national crisis. But is it? As it happens, Brookings Institution scholar Tom Loveless took on this question in a 2003 report that persuasively refuted the notion that most American kids are academically overloaded. Reviewing an assortment of studies, he found that even in high school the typical American student spends less than one hour studying per day. While there has been a marked increase in homework among younger students in recent years, the average amounts are still modest — about two hours per week for kids ages 6 to 8, and under four hours per week for those ages 9 to 12 — and the rising average is largely driven by a decline in the proportion of kids who had no homework at all. What's more, studying is far outpaced by time playing sports, and is dwarfed by — surprise — hours devoted to watching television (13 and a half per week among 9- to 12-year-olds, for example). All this seems hard to square with the melodramatic tales told by Bennett and Kalish of children left with no time for play, forced to drop beloved extracurricular activities, and doomed to obesity by sedentary hours spent toiling over school assignments. Neither do the high school numbers support Kohn's dark insinuation that unbearable workloads may lead teens to cope with homework stress in unspecified 'troubling ways.' Oh, and that wished-for parental rebellion? Inconveniently, polling shows that most parents are happy with their kids' homework load — and of those who aren't, more say it is too light than too heavy. Perhaps homework really is out of control in certain (generally affluent) schools and districts. But that would be a far narrower problem than the national epidemic these authors describe. Their books are best understood as part of a broader ideological struggle over the direction of American education. From his approving invocation of Noam Chomsky to his denunciation of testing and other accountability-based reforms, it's clear that Kohn sees homework as just one more instrument of social control. Even the valid points he makes (for instance, that the correlation between homework and academic achievement in some grades doesn't necessarily imply causation) are undercut by his tendentious approach. There's no small irony in a professional provocateur like Kohn accusing respected researchers of being 'polemicists' who cherry-pick studies to buttress their pre-existing views. Bennett and Kalish, though less overtly political, are just as apt to cast children in the role of an oppressed class. It's a shame these volumes aren't more credible. Averages notwithstanding, some kids certainly do get buried in assignments of dubious worth — and in those cases Bennett and Kalish's lobbying tips could prove useful. Similarly, Kohn's insistence that schools justify both the quantity and quality of the work they're assigning is perfectly reasonable. But in the absence of more persuasive evidence that American kids are plagued by excessive, rather than insufficient, academic rigor — homework included — parents and policymakers should look elsewhere for a nuanced and reliable guide to this eminently worthy subject. Ben Wildavsky is a senior fellow in research and policy at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and former education editor of U.S. News & World Report." Reviewed by Ben Wildavsky, Washington Post Book World (Copyright 2006 Washington Post Book World Service/Washington Post Writers Group)
(hide most of this review)
"The book...feels like homework, frankly. But...do it anyway. If you do, you'll see him chip away at the conventional thinking that homework improves achievement, that homework improves grades, that homework builds character and all the other things we've heard about it since we were doing it." San Diego Union-Tribune
"The book is a little dense at times but is well argued and will stimulate lots of discussion." Library Journal
"Whatever their opinions about homework, parents and teachers will find this book an interesting part of the debate." Booklist
A compelling expose of homework--its negative effects, why it's so widely accepted, and what we can do about it
In The Homework Myth, nationally known educator and parenting expert Alfie Kohn challenges the usual defenses of homework and shows that none of our assumptions about its benefits actually passes the test of research, logic, or experience
So why do we continue to administer this modern cod liver oil-or even demand a larger dose? Kohns incisive analysis reveals how a set of misconceptions about learning and a misguided focus on competitiveness has left our kids with less free time, and our families with more conflict. Pointing to stories of parents who have fought back-and schools that have proved educational excellence is possible without homework-Kohn demonstrates how we can rethink what happens during and after school in order to rescue our families and our childrens love of learning.
About the Author
Alfie Kohn is the author of ten previous books, including Punished by Rewards, The Schools Our Children Deserve, and Unconditional Parenting, which have helped to shape the thinking of parents and educators throughout the country and abroad. He lectures widely and has appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show, the Today show, and many other TV and radio programs. He lives with his family in the Boston area.
What Our Readers Are Saying
Average customer rating based on 1 comment:
Other books you might like