Grand Avenues tells the riveting story of Pierre Charles L’Enfant and the creation of Washington D.C.--from the seeds of his inspiration to the fulfillment of his extraordinary vision.

L’Enfant’s story is one of consuming passion, high emotion, artistic genius, and human frailty. As a boy he studied drawing at the most prestigious art institute in the world. As a young man he left his home in Paris to volunteer in the army of the American colonies, where he served under George Washington. There he would also meet many of the people who would have a profound impact on his life, including Alexander Hamilton and James Monroe. And it was Washington himself who, in 1791, entrusted L’Enfant with the planning of the nation’s capital--and reluctantly allowed him to be dismissed from the project eleven months later. The plan for the city was published under another name, and for the remainder of his life L’Enfant fought for recognition of his achievement. But he would not live to see that day, and a century would pass before L’Enfant would be given credit for his brilliant design.

Scott W. Berg recounts this tale, richly evocative of time and place, with the narrative verve of a novel and with a cast of characters that ranges from Thomas Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers to the surveyor who took credit for L’Enfant’s plans, the assistant who spent a week in jail for his loyalty to L’Enfant, and the men who finally restored L’Enfant’s reputation at the beginning of the twentienth century.

Here is a fascinating, little-explored episode in American history: the story of a visionary artist and of the founding of the magnificent city that is his enduring legacy.

"On the rainy evening in March of 1791 when Maj. Pierre Charles L'Enfant arrived in the lively little port of Georgetown, few people besides the 36-year-old major himself had an inkling of the visionary enterprise he was about to undertake.

L'Enfant's instructions were limited. He was to make drawings of the territory selected two months earlier by President George Washington as a site... Washington Post Book Review (read the entire Washington Post review) for the new nation's capital city. But to say that L'Enfant interpreted this limited mandate broadly is to greatly understate the case.

Setting to the arduous work the very next day and continuing without letup into the summer, the veteran of America's Revolutionary War proceeded to lay out a city that was ambitious in scale, boldly imaginative in form and rich in symbolic reach. The city L'Enfant foresaw was, in effect, a complex, spacious urban stage upon which the promise of the new democracy could be born.

L'Enfant early on gained the impassioned support of Washington, for his plan reflected the first president's Federalist penchant for making the capital a bold embodiment of a strong central government. But the transplanted Frenchman, who preferred the Anglicized Peter to his given name Pierre, made many more enemies than friends during his brief stay on the national stage, including local landowners and the three commissioners Washington appointed to oversee the capital's development. Nor was Thomas Jefferson a fan of L'Enfant or his plan — he distrusted big cities and had his own, more modest ideas about what the capital should be.

In the end, not even George Washington's support could save L'Enfant from the political entanglements of his time, and he received scant credit during his lifetime. He was pretty well forgotten by the time he died, in 1825, an impecunious 70-year-old guest at a Prince George's County (Md.) plantation.

The story of the city's founding and its great plan — disillusioning and inspirational by turns — is a riveting tale that has been told before. But the life of L'Enfant has long needed a lively, thorough, fair-minded accounting, and this is precisely what it gets in 'Grand Avenues.' Scott W. Berg, who teaches writing at George Mason University, has gifts for narrative exposition and vivid description, which serve him well throughout.

Early in the book, Berg is able to dismiss the tired myth of the federal district as a 'swamp' without even using the word. 'Wedged in the elbow of two rivers,' he writes, 'the undulating landscape offered considerable variety: fields of tobacco and corn, small forests of maple and black cherry and tulip poplar, waterside bluffs and patches of tidal marsh, all of it spotted with great Georgian homes made of brick and the smaller wooden structures of tenant farmers and slaves.'

This, then, was the land that L'Enfant traveled day after day, his mind alive with the possibility of its transformation. How he got to such a point is a tale rich with improbability. He arrived on American soil in early 1777, one of many ambitious young Frenchmen who sought glory by coming to the aid of the rebellious American colonies. Though he was neither a soldier nor an engineer, he came here under both labels. Severely wounded during a brave if ill-advised assault on British fortifications in Savannah, he served seven largely undistinguished years in the Continental Army. But he had spent much of his youth in the vicinity of Andre Le Notre's dramatic royal gardens in Versailles, had been rigorously trained as an artist at the Royal Academy in Paris and had observed urban plans at work in that city. He also had the gift of making friends in high places — most notably, the commanding general himself — and was able to parlay these skills into a career so promising that, by the mid-1780s, he was sought out by the new nation's elite for many artistic and architectural commissions.

These years were preparation for the plan of the new capital city, the one indisputably great deed of L'Enfant's life. Washington chose L'Enfant for the job because he was uniquely qualified to do it, but the president was forced to accept the planner's resignation less than a year after the appointment. This is the core of Berg's story. He spends several chapters disentangling the 'contagion of disorder and distrust' that enveloped L'Enfant and his plan. L'Enfant never was able to comprehend the political importance of the presidentially appointed commissioners, and he oversaw the dismantling of a house that intruded on the route of one of his grand avenues — a house belonging to a wealthy, well-connected landowner.

More important, however, Berg leads us to understand just how basic the disagreements between L'Enfant and his antagonists were. L'Enfant spoke the language of a sophisticated, visionary urban planner in the European tradition. The commissioners simply did not understand this language. Furthermore, L'Enfant knew that only public expenditure — entailing public borrowing — could pay for what today we'd call the plan's infrastructure, thus assuring a healthy beginning for the capital. That idea, rooted in royalist Europe, ran against the grain in the politically disputatious and sectionally divided new republic.

But what glorious infrastructure! It took more than a century to build even a semblance of L'Enfant's brilliant dream, but the vision was strong enough — and subtle enough — to survive. Berg tells the story with appealing empathy and comes to a rousing — and proper — conclusion: L'Enfant's plan was 'the first great artistic achievement that could truly be called "American."'

Benjamin Forgey is the former architecture critic of The Washington Post.

" Reviewed by Benjamin Forgey, Washington Post Book World (Copyright 2006 Washington Post Book World Service/Washington Post Writers Group)
(hide most of this review)

Berg (nonfiction writing and literature, George Mason U.) recounts the story of Pierre Charles L'Enfant (1755-1825), a Frenchman who left Paris to volunteer in the army of the American colonies, serving under George Washington, and was later chosen by Washington to plan the nation's capital. Illustrated with b&w maps and reproductions. Academic but accessible to the general reader. Annotation ©2007 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

“Scott Berg has created a readable portrait of Pierre Charles L’Enfant that shows the artist in full, with both his great gifts and his Icarus-like ambition. It is fascinating to speculate how America’s federal government might have emerged differently over the centuries if it had been seated in Thomas Jefferson’s simple ‘federal town’ rather than in L’Enfant’s grandiose city. The character of the capital city today is inseparable from its designer’s personality and vision.” –David A. Price, author of Love and Hate in Jamestown: John Smith, Pocahontas, and the Start of a New Nation

“A lively and literate view of Washington's early history, with liberal dashes of intrigue for good measure.” –Kirkus

“L’Enfant’s idiosyncratic personality interfered with his complete success yet only serves to make this biography a fascinating read.” –Booklist

Scott W. Berg holds a B.A. in architecture from the University of Minnesota, an M.A. from Miami University, and an M.F.A. in creative writing from George Mason University, where he now teaches nonfiction writing and literature. He publishes frequently in The Washington Post and lives in Washington, D.C. Visit his Web sites at www.scottwberg.com and www.grandavenues.com.