|
 
$61.75
New Hardcover
Ships in 1 to 3 days
 available for shipping or prepaid pickup only
More copies of this ISBNeBook editionsThe Top Ten Death Penalty Myths: The Politics of Crime Controlby Rudolph J. Gerber
Synopses & ReviewsPublisher Comments:The death penalty remains one of the most controversial issues in the United States. Its proponents claim many things in their defense of its continued application. For example, they claim that it deters crime, that death by lethal injection is painless and humane, that it is racially neutral, and that it provides closure to families of the victims. In this comprehensive review of the major death penalty issues, the authors systematically dismantle each one of these myths about capital punishment in a hard-hitting critique of how our social, political, and community leaders have used fear and myth (symbolic politics) to misrepresent the death penalty as a public policy issue. They successfully demonstrate how our political and community leaders have used myth and emotional appeals to misrepresent the facts about capital executions. Successive chapters address the following topics: the notion of community bonding, the expectation of effective crime fighting, the desire for equal justice, deterrence, the hope for fidelity to the Constitution, the claim of error-free justice, closure, retribution, cost-effectiveness, and the messianic desires of some politicians. In each of these areas the authors quote from death penalty advocates making these claims and then proceed to analyze and ultimately dismember the claimed advantages of the death penalty. Book News Annotation:Support for capital punishment in the United States rests on a number
of myths, according to Gerber (a former judge on the Arizona Court of
Appeals) and Johnson (justice studies, Arizona State U.). They
identify ten of these myths and spend individual chapters debunking
them. The myths include the ideas that capital punishment provides
some form of communal expression of shared moral values, that the
legal system rarely makes errors of guilt or innocence, that racial
disparities are negligible in application of the death penalty, that
capital punishment deters crime, that the death penalty is
constitutionally acceptable, that executions can be humane, that they
provide closure to victims' families, that the principle of
retribution demands the death penalty, that the death penalty is a
financially effective form of crime control, and that political
advocates for the death penalty are sincere in their arguments.
Annotation ©2008 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com) About the AuthorRUDOLPH J. GERBER is a lawyer in private practice who teaches at Arizona State University. He is also a retired judge on the Arizona Court of Appeals. His most recent book is Legalizing Marijuana: Drug Policy Reform and Prohibition Politics.JOHN M. JOHNSON is Professor of Justice Studies at the School of Justice and Social Inquiry, Arizona State University, where he has taught since 1972. He has published 12 books and has headed the ASU chapter of Amnesty International for 12 years. What Our Readers Are SayingBe the first to add a comment for a chance to win!Product Details
Other books you might like
Related Aisles
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Follow us on...
|
||||||||||
Don't Miss
