- STAFF PICKS
- GIFTS + GIFT CARDS
- SELL BOOKS
- FIND A STORE
Used Trade Paper
Ships in 1 to 3 days
More copies of this ISBN
Other titles in the Contemporary Issues series:
National Security, Civil Liberties, and the War on Terror (Contemporary Issues)by M Katherine B Darmer
Synopses & Reviews
In the decade following the attacks of September 11, 2001, there has been an ongoing and important public discussion about the balance between legitimate national security concerns and individual civil liberties. In particular, the use of "waterboarding" on detained enemy combatants has stirred passionate debate. What limits should be placed on interrogating suspected terrorists? Is torture ever appropriate? What due process rights apply to these prisoners? Are there limits to executive power in wartime? In both the Bush and Obama administrations, such delicate and complex constitutional questions regarding executive power, the detention of enemy combatants, and habeas corpus rights have challenged the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This timely collection of recent articles and judicial commentary provides a balance of perspectives on concrete issues under the umbrella of national security and civil liberties. It includes court judgments as well as opinion pieces both from those who believe the United States needs to be more protective of civil liberties and also from those who argue that national security concerns are paramount. It addresses some of the most hotly debated issues of the day, including the detentions at Guantanamo Bay, the use of torture, holding enemy combatants indefinitely, the question of whether terrorism suspects should be given the Miranda warnings, and the limits of executive power during wartime. To stress the importance of an impartial, independent judiciary, the author explains the history of the German judiciary and judges during the Nazi Era. This balanced selection of expert opinion from widely recognized and respected authors will inform and educate readers on this critical topic. It will be especially useful for undergraduate courses in political philosophy, political science, and criminal justice, as well as law school courses addressing issues of the constitutional balance of powers, national security, interrogation practices, due process and habeas corpus.
Book News Annotation:
This collection of thirty-one essays on national security, counter terrorism and civil liberties, examines competing views on the lengths to which personal freedoms and constitutional guarantees may be curtailed in the name of security. Divided into sections covering the history of the current anti-terrorism climate, interrogation practices, immigration and racial profiling, secrecy and surveillance and detention and the constitution, essays address such topics as justifying wartime limits on civil rights and liberties, torture and positive law, the use of "common-sense" profiling and comparative perspectives on the State Secrets Privilege. Most entries have been drawn from previously published works and the volume includes the relevant transcripts of several important court cases and government policy statements and documents. Contributors are influential professors of law from a variety of institutions. Annotation ©2011 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
This timely collection of recent articles and judicial commentary provides a balance of perspectives of the ongoing and important public discussion of national security and civil liberties.
The late M. Katherine B. Darmer was professor of law at the Chapman University School of Law and formerly an Assistant United States Attorney in New York, NY. She was the editor with Robert M. Baird of Morality, Justice, and the Law and with Robert M. Baird and Stuart Rosenbaum of Civil Liberties and National Security in a Post-9/11 World, and the author of a number of articles addressing interrogation practices, the Fifth Amendment, and national security.
Richard D. Fybel (Santa Ana, CA) is an associate justice of the California Court of Appeal in Santa Ana, CA. He is also the chair of the California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Ethics and was formerly a judge in the Orange County Superior Court.
What Our Readers Are Saying
History and Social Science » Law » Civil Liberties and Human Rights