The Good, the Bad, and the Hungry Sale
 
 

Recently Viewed clear list


Original Essays | July 22, 2014

Nick Harkaway: IMG The Florist-Assassins



The three men lit up in my mind's eye, with footnotes. They were converging on me — and on the object I was carrying — in a way that had... Continue »
  1. $18.87 Sale Hardcover add to wish list

    Tigerman

    Nick Harkaway 9780385352413

spacer
Qualifying orders ship free.
$35.00
New Hardcover
Ships in 1 to 3 days
Add to Wishlist
Qty Store Section
1 Burnside US History- Revolution and Constitution Era
7 Local Warehouse Business- History and Biography
15 Remote Warehouse US History- Revolution and Constitution Era

This title in other editions

The Founders and Finance: How Hamilton, Gallatin, and Other Immigrants Forged a New Economy

by

The Founders and Finance: How Hamilton, Gallatin, and Other Immigrants Forged a New Economy Cover

 

 

Excerpt

<p><b>From Part I, Chapter Ten: </b><b><i>The Bank of the United States</i></b></p><p><b><i> </i></b></p><p> The House passed Hamilton&rsquo;s Bank bill by the one-sided vote of 39&ndash;20. After the Senate also passed the bill and sent it to Washington for his signature, the president asked Secretary of State Jefferson and Attorney General Edmund Randolph for their opinions. Jefferson, in addition to regarding Hamilton as an immigrant upstart, detested all banks, and opposed this one in particular on the additional grounds of unconstitutionality. Both he and Randolph returned a negative verdict. They argued that the Constitution said nothing about incorporating banks or any other kinds of business. In effect, they were recommending that Washington veto the Bank bill. Jefferson&rsquo;s message was strongly phrased, and although he hedged a bit on the matter of a veto, there could be little question that this is what he wanted. Randolph and Jefferson were Virginians, and most politicians from their state opposed Hamilton&rsquo;s Bank bill. Washington, also a Virginian but more of a nationalist than the other two, was genuinely undecided. As a contingency, he asked James Madison to draft a veto message. </p><p> </p><p> The president then put the question to Hamilton, giving him the written objections from Randolph and Jefferson. After a week of feverish composition, the secretary produced a long and sophisticated response. He began by noting that the essence of both Jefferson&rsquo;s and Randolph&rsquo;s objections lay in their narrow interpretation of federal powers under the Constitution: &ldquo;The objections of the Secretary of State and Attorney General are founded on a general denial of the authority of the United States to erect corporations.&rdquo; From this beginning Hamilton constructed a step-by-step rebuttal of both the premises and specific arguments employed by Randolph and particularly by Jefferson. </p><p> </p><p> &ldquo;A strange fallacy seems to have crept into the matter of thinking &amp; reasoning upon the subject,&rdquo; Hamilton wrote. &ldquo;An incorporation seems to have been regarded as some great, independent, substantive thing&mdash;as a political end of peculiar magnitude &amp; moment; whereas it is truly to be considered as a <i>quality</i>,<i> capacity</i>, or <i>mean </i>to an end.&rdquo; In other words, incorporation of the Bank of the United States was a type of measure clearly contemplated by the Constitution in its &ldquo;necessary and proper&rdquo; clause about what the federal government could or could not do. </p><p> </p><p> If Jefferson&rsquo;s reading of the Constitution were correct, Hamilton went on to say, it would be &ldquo;as if the word <i>absolutely</i> or<i> indispensibly</i> had been prefixed&rdquo; to the necessary and proper clause. &ldquo;Such a construction would beget endless uncertainty and embarrassment. The cases must be palpable &amp; extreme in which it could be pronounced with certainty that a measure was absolutely necessary, or one without which the exercise of a given power would be nugatory. There are few measures of any government, which would stand so severe a test.&rdquo; </p><p> </p><p> Furthermore, although Jefferson&rsquo;s letter to Washington had referred to the adequacy of existing banks, his reasoning would prohibit not only the national government but also the states from incorporating a bank. &ldquo;It is to be remembered, that there is no express power in any State constitution to erect corporations.&rdquo; This was a telling detail that Hamilton knew from his research in drafting the charter of the Bank of New York in 1784, whereas Jefferson likely did not. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>

Product Details

ISBN:
9780674066922
Author:
Mccraw, Thomas K
Publisher:
Belknap Press
Author:
McCraw, Thomas K.
Location:
Cambridge
Subject:
United States / Revolutionary Period (1775-1800)
Subject:
Business-History and Biography
Subject:
History - United States/19th Century
Subject:
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economic History
Subject:
Economic History
Subject:
Modern History To 20th Century: C 1700 To C 1900
Subject:
USA
Copyright:
Edition Description:
Cloth
Publication Date:
20121031
Binding:
HARDCOVER
Language:
English
Illustrations:
24 halftones
Pages:
496
Dimensions:
9 x 6 in

Other books you might like

  1. Creating Modern Capitalism: How... Used Trade Paper $16.95

Related Subjects

Business » History and Biographies
History and Social Science » Economics » General
History and Social Science » US History » 19th Century
History and Social Science » US History » Revolution and Constitution Era
History and Social Science » World History » General

The Founders and Finance: How Hamilton, Gallatin, and Other Immigrants Forged a New Economy New Hardcover
0 stars - 0 reviews
$35.00 In Stock
Product details 496 pages Belknap Press - English 9780674066922 Reviews:
"Publishers Weekly Review" by , "A Pulitzer Prize winner and Harvard Business School emeritus professor, McCraw sheds light on personalities and policies in this overview of the development of early American finance. The newly independent United States 'had long been bankrupt'; both the fledgling national government and the states were in hock for the War of Independence. According to McCraw (Prophets of Regulation), brilliant immigrants, such as Alexander Hamilton and Albert Gallatin, lacked the parochial vision common to their peers, who saw the basis of wealth mostly in land. With at least 50 'coinages and currencies... in circulation' in 1789, banking was in turmoil. The main economic resource for the federal government was tariffs on imports, mostly from Britain. Hamilton's decisive advocacy of a national bank and assumption of state war debts laid the basis for economic expansion and cemented the dominance of federal power. McCraw then turns to Gallatin's ascendency in Congress, where in 1796 he denounced the growth in the national debt and decried high military spending. Starting with the still-resonant contrast between the 'big government' Hamilton and 'small government' Gallatin, McCraw's wealth of historical data should interest any lay historian, particularly when he presents the many 'what if's.' (Oct.)" Publishers Weekly Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
"Synopsis" by , In 1776 the U.S. owed huge sums to foreign creditors and its own citizens but, lacking the power to tax, had no means to repay them. This is the first book to tell the story of how foreign-born financial specialists--the immigrant founders Hamilton and Gallatin--solved the fiscal crisis and set the nation on a path to long-term economic prosperity.
"Synopsis" by , A Bloomberg News Favorite Book of 2013
"Synopsis" by , A Financial Advisor Best Book of 2013
spacer
spacer
  • back to top
Follow us on...




Powell's City of Books is an independent bookstore in Portland, Oregon, that fills a whole city block with more than a million new, used, and out of print books. Shop those shelves — plus literally millions more books, DVDs, and gifts — here at Powells.com.