- STAFF PICKS
- GIFTS + GIFT CARDS
- SELL BOOKS
- FIND A STORE
What Jesus Meantby Garry Wills
Synopses & Reviews
As the religious rhetoric of the culture wars escalates, New York Times bestselling author and eminent scholar Garry Wills explores the meaning of Jesus's teachings.
In what are billed as "culture wars," people on the political right and the political left cite Jesus as endorsing their views. Garry Wills argues that Jesus subscribed to no political program. He was far more radical than that. In a fresh reading of the gospels, Wills explores the meaning of the "reign of heaven" Jesus not only promised for the future but brought with him into this life. It is only by dodges and evasions that people misrepresent what Jesus plainly had to say against power, the wealthy, and religion itself. Jesus came from the lower class, the working class, and he spoke to and for that class. This is a book that will challenge the assumptions of almost everyone who brings religion into politics — "Christian socialists" as well as biblical theocrats.
But Wills is just as critical of those who would make Jesus a mere ethical teacher, ignoring or playing down his divinity. Jesus without the Resurrection is simply not the Jesus of the gospels. Wills calls his book a profession of faith in the risen Lord, the Son of the Father, who leads us to the Father. He argues that this does not make people embrace an otherworldliness that ignores the poor or the problems of our time.
What Jesus Meant will no doubt spark debate about our understanding of Jesus and the Scriptures, especially as we head into midterm elections that will certainly prompt many heated discussions on the role of religion in our society.
"Christianity has been twisted and warped to such an extent that not even Jesus would recognize it now. This is Wills's thesis in his stimulating, fresh look into the life and message of Jesus of Nazareth. The now-ubiquitous phrase, 'What Would Jesus Do?' encouraged Wills, professor of history at Northwestern University and prolific writer on contemporary religion, to take a closer look at how the Christian message has been used and abused in recent times. Wills believes that most Christians don't understand Jesus' startlingly radical message, so they should not claim to have knowledge of how he would act today. People of all political persuasions have used Jesus' words to rationalize a domesticated, flaccid Christianity that upholds the status quo, or, worse yet, supports discrimination toward those who are on the margins. This attitude, according to Wills, completely misses the truth that Jesus 'walks through social barriers and taboos as if they were cobwebs.' Readers who are familiar with Wills's writing know that he is not shy about critiquing organized religion, and they will not be disappointed. Although his arguments lean toward hyperbole at times, at its core this book invites Christians toward more honest reflection on the life and message of the one they call 'Savior.'" Publishers Weekly (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.)
"The Library of Congress holds close to 17,000 books on Jesus, and about the best thing that can be said about Garry Wills' 'What Jesus Meant' is that it is probably not the worst. Wills tells us in his foreword that Jesus is 'a divine mystery walking among men,' but rather than reveling in that mystery, he tries to solve it — dissolve it, actually — in a strange brew of devotional cant and historical... Washington Post Book Review (read the entire Washington Post review) Jesus cliches. For decades, participants in the quest for the historical Jesus have been arguing that Jesus was a radical egalitarian — a '60s-style rebel who left his home and his job to seek, in the company of a small cadre of equally disreputable comrades, the kingdom of heaven on earth. This, too, is the Jesus according to Wills: an 'outcast among outcasts,' a 'man of the margins' who broke bread not with the rich and the powerful but with lepers and prostitutes. What distinguishes 'What Jesus Meant' from books by the likes of John Dominic Crossan (who has also fashioned Jesus in the image of Jack Kerouac) is its insistence that Jesus was allergic to politics. In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus says that he has come 'to preach good news to the poor ... to proclaim freedom for the prisoners ... to release the oppressed.' But apparently Jesus does not always mean what he says. What he means to say, according to his latest amanuensis, is that he came 'to instill a religion of the heart, with only himself as the place where we encounter the Father.' Jesus came not to establish a church or to preach a new politics but to bring in 'heaven's reign,' which, according to Wills, is characterized by love and love alone. 'In the gospel of Jesus, love is everything,' Wills writes, adding that this love 'is not a dreamy, sentimental, gushy thing. It is radical love, exigent, searing, terrifying.' Yet Wills' Jesus has no real radicalism in him. His is a purely interpersonal and domesticated love, divorced entirely from the exigencies of politics and economy. To be fair, it should be noted that Wills (a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian who is Roman Catholic) allows his Jesus to hold forth on ecclesiastical politics; to plump for married clergy and for women priests; and to denounce the hypocrisy and self-righteousness of the Catholic Church, its history of bribery and warfare, and the haughty disdain of its holier-than-thou hierarchy for ordinary believers. In early Christianity, there were no priests, no bishops and certainly no pope, Wills observes. Benedict XVI, 'like his predecessors, is returning to the religion Jesus renounced.' Though Wills allows Jesus to rail against the papacy's gluttony for power — what else can we expect from the author of 'Papal Sin: Structures of Deceit?' — he stifles his savior entirely when it comes to the broader arena of politics and society. Jesus 'had no political program,' Wills insists. He was 'not a social reformer.' If the question is 'What Would Jesus Do?' and the context is political and economic life, then the answer is absolutely, positively nothing. Wills is trying to undercut efforts by the religious right to cast Jesus as a conservative Republican. In one of the strongest passages in this surprisingly flaccid book, Wills likens recent efforts by evangelicals to dress Jesus up 'in borrowed political robes' to the burlesque of the Roman soldiers who adorned him with a crown and scepter while mocking him as 'king of the Jews.' Whereas Jim Wallis (the author of the influential 'God's Politics') and others on the religious left have criticized evangelicals for getting Jesus' politics wrong, Wills insists that Jesus had no politics to get, that 'his reign is not of that order.' Wills wants to see a great wall constructed between American religion and American politics, and he is determined to have Jesus do the heavy lifting. There are two problems with this approach. First, as Wills' own 'Under God' demonstrated, U.S. religion and politics cannot be separated so neatly. Except in the mind of Jefferson and his most fanatical acolytes (Wills included), church and state have been intimates here from the moment George Washington put his hand on a Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. Efforts to make religion politically impotent have always been futile in this country, as have efforts to make politics religiously irrelevant. Second, it is just not true that the Jesus of the Gospels has no politics. As Wills himself argues, Jesus spoke repeatedly about inequality and injustice. He 'renounced theocracy.' He was 'opposed to war and violence.' He was 'a threat to power.' But how much of a threat can you be if you refuse to act — or even to speak — for or against the powers of this world? (What would have become of the abolitionist or civil rights movements if every ounce of the prophets had been emptied out of Jesus?) Since the late, great 'faith-based' election of 2004, in which 'values voters' reportedly secured a born-again president's re-election, Democrats have been wringing their hands over what to do next. Should they get religion, translate their policies into the rhetoric of revelation and inform American voters that they have values and even faith, too? Or should they stick to the party line of rights and reasons and continue to insist that religion and politics have always been and must forever remain separate? 'What Jesus Meant' is an ill-conceived brief for the latter view. As such, it tells us far more about Wills than about Jesus, more about Wills' devotion to our third president than about his faith in the second part of the Trinity. Rather than putting his hand in the hand of the man from Galilee, Wills puts his hand in the hand of the man from Monticello. In the process, he misleads the Democrats and misreads the Gospels. Stephen Prothero teaches in the Department of Religion at Boston University and is the author of 'American Jesus: How the Son of God Became a National Icon.'" Reviewed by Stephen Prothero, Washington Post Book World (Copyright 2006 Washington Post Book World Service/Washington Post Writers Group)
(hide most of this review)
"Addressing the meaning of Jesus' teachings in the first century C.E., the book serves as a tool to combat the politicization of Jesus in the modern world....A fresh look at an old topic." Library Journal
"Wills' dissent from certain pro-clerical and exclusivist statements Benedict XVI has made assure him the continued opprobrium of institutional church hardliners, but his portrayal of Jesus the radical is so profoundly familiar as to be irrefutable." Booklist
Garry Wills brings his signature brand of erudite, unorthodox thinking to his latest book of revelations. . . . A tour de force and a profound show of faith.” (O, the Oprah Magazine)
In what are billed culture wars,” people on the political right and the political left cite Jesus as endorsing their views. But in this New York Times-bestselling masterpiece, Garry Wills argues that Jesus subscribed to no political program. He was far more radical than that. In a fresh reading of the gospels, Wills explores the meaning of the reign of heaven” Jesus not only promised for the future but brought with him into this life. It is only by dodges and evasions that people misrepresent what Jesus plainly had to say against power, the wealthy, and religion itself. But Wills is just as critical of those who would make Jesus a mere ethical teacher, ignoring or playing down his divinity. An illuminating analysis for believers and nonbelievers alike, What Jesus Meant is a brilliant addition to our national conversation on religion.
About the Author
Garry Wills is one of the most respected writers on religion today. He is the author of Saint Augustine's Childhood, Saint Augustine's Memory, and Saint Augustine's Sin, the first three volumes in this series, as well as the Penguin Lives biography Saint Augustine. His other books include "Negro President": Jefferson and the Slave Power, Why I Am a Catholic, Papal Sin, and Lincoln at Gettysburg, which won the Pulitzer Prize.
What Our Readers Are Saying
Average customer rating based on 2 comments:
Other books you might like