Mega Dose
 
 

Special Offers see all

Enter to WIN a $100 Credit

Subscribe to PowellsBooks.news
for a chance to win.
Privacy Policy

Tour our stores


    Recently Viewed clear list


    Original Essays | September 18, 2014

    Lin Enger: IMG Knowing vs. Knowing



    On a hot July evening years ago, my Toyota Tercel overheated on a flat stretch of highway north of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. A steam geyser shot up from... Continue »

    spacer
Qualifying orders ship free.
$6.95
List price: $16.00
Used Trade Paper
Ships in 1 to 3 days
Add to Wishlist
Qty Store Section
2 Hawthorne Literature- A to Z

Juliet, Naked

by

Juliet, Naked Cover

ISBN13: 9781594484773
ISBN10: 1594484775
Condition: Standard
All Product Details

Only 2 left in stock at $6.95!

 

 

Author Q & A

You've come back in this book to some of your signature themes — rock 'n' roll, super fandom, the truths and lies we tell ourselves about love. What prompted the return?

Well, of course now I see it written down like that, I can see some of Juliet, Naked might seem like familiar territory to someone who's read a couple of my other books, but it didn't feel like that, either in its conception or its execution. I wanted to write about the way art is consumed, how it means different things to different people, and easily the best way of writing about that democratically and accessibly is to use rock 'n' roll as a subject, because more or less everybody has some kind of relationship with it. And as for "the lies we tell ourselves about love"...Well, what else is there? Also, these characters are well into the second half of their lives. The stakes are higher then. The mistakes cost more.

Is Tucker Crowe based on any actual singer-songwriters?

No. But there are bits and pieces of other artists in there, anecdotes and episodes that might bring other legendary writers and musicians to mind.

Have you ever been the object of over-zealous fandom? Was Duncan's pursuit of Tucker Crowe inspired in any way by your personal experience?

Not that I'm aware of. My readers seem like a pretty level-headed bunch, on the whole. And anyway, I would rather chew off my own arm than Google my name. That way madness lies, I think.

This novel is in part a kind of anatomy of obsessive fandom. It seems that you're both celebrating it and satirizing it. There's the sheer geekiness and borderline stalker behavior, of course. But then there are the positive elements — the pure admiration of art and a sense of genuine curatorship. Can you comment on that tension?

It's just as you've described it, I think. It's pretty funny, but it's valuable too. Many of us enjoy reading biographies of the artists we love to read or listen to or watch on screen, but you wouldn't necessarily want to be trapped in an elevator with the people who've written them. Scholars do illuminate their subjects, frequently and dazzlingly, but they can be very weird souls.

Tucker thinks at one point, "If you wanted to get into people's living rooms, could you then object if they wanted to get into yours?" Is there an implicit bargain between artists and their fans? Are musicians or movie stars or writers being disingenuous or hypocritical when they object to excessive attention from their fans?

It's a difficult line to walk, especially if you have consciously cultivated some kind of mystique, which to a certain kind of fan is a provocation. The truth is, you're always going to disappoint people who have something invested in you. If you're going to have any kind of career in the arts, you get found out in the end.

One of the key questions in this book is, "What do you do if you think you've wasted fifteen years of your life?" We'd all like to think that we can start our lives over at any point, but is it sometimes really too late?

Yes, of course. One of the hardest things to recognize is that our mistakes — and these mistakes can take years, decades even, to unravel — are essential to who we are. I have wasted whole chunks of my life, but actually, none of the waste ever really went to waste, if you see what I mean. It just has to be endured, painfully.

The province of failed relationships — the relationships between ex-partners, in which the smallest exchanges are loaded with meaning — is a major preoccupation of this novel. Why are you particularly concerned with this subject at this point?

I'm not sure it's a particular obsession of mine. But once you get to a certain age, you're much more capable of writing about it than you were before....

How much of yourself did you put into each one of your main characters — Duncan, Annie, and Tucker?

Oh, I recognize all of them, and Tucker is a writer of sorts...But this certainly isn't an autobiographical book. It's just that, when you get to a certain age, you've made lots of little messes in all sorts of areas of life, and you can see how those little messes might have become big messes, and the kind of havoc they might have wreaked. Anyone who has kids, a few broken relationships and a job has the raw materials for several novels.

The Internet is almost a character in this book. It keeps Tucker Crowe's memory alive, even though his career has gone dormant. "Nobody was forgotten anymore," you write. Is the Internet the new form of eternal life? The Internet also allows the international community of Tucker Crowe fanatics — or "Croweologists," as they like to call themselves — to find one another. How is the Internet changing our definitions of community, communication, and individual and group consciousness?

First of all, the Internet has had an enormous impact on music, and that had to be reflected in this novel. Nobody could write High Fidelity now. And of course one of the biggest changes has been on the solitary geeky fan. Thirty years ago, if you'd been an obsessive devotee of a cult artist in a small English seaside town, you'd have been on your own. Now, you can talk to people who think the same as you about any subject you care to name, all day and every day, if you so choose. And I'm not sure how healthy that is: you don't have to try and get on with real people in the real world, people who don't share every single strand of your cultural DNA. Blocking out all these other influences leads to stagnation.

From the artist's point of view, I think it can lead to a sense of self-importance, a lack of humility. Someone, somewhere, is talking about you, this second — you can prove it, more or less. That can't be good for you.

Some of the most wryly amusing parts of the book have to do with Tucker reestablishing contact with his far-flung children by his many ex-wives. He quips that he's becoming an expert in the art of Paternal Reintroduction. Is it possible to maintain these kinds of distant parental relationships in any kind of meaningful way? Or are we deluding ourselves in thinking that it's just a matter of developing the proper etiquette?

Here's one thing I've never understood: what use is Frasier Crane supposed to be to his kid? He's in Seattle, his boy is in Boston, and yet he's supposed to be this wise, emotionally literate guy. Tucker realizes that he's messed it up with all of his kids bar one. I suspect he's right. He's no good to them, and yet for some reason the people surrounding him think he ought to be.

One of Tucker's children accuses him of choosing art over her. Is that judgment too harsh?

I don't think so. That's what happened. As the narrative develops, it's clear that he's chosen the health of his reputation over the relationship with his eldest daughter. I wouldn't make the same choice myself, I'd like to think, but now he's done it, he has to live with the consequences. And one of the questions I've tried to pose in the book is: Are they really so terrible?

Is Gooleness a real town in England? Why did you choose it as Annie and Duncan's home?

No, it's not a real town. There are towns like it, but I chose to invent one, for various reasons. And I chose it as a home for Annie and Duncan because it makes their sense of cultural isolation more real, and because it seemed more likely to me that fear and inertia would have kept them together far longer than they should have been together.

Have you ever had a creative block, like Tucker? It would seem not, given your level of productivity, but do you fear that it could happen?

I've had the odd couple of months, here and there — in fact, this novel came out of a creative block, a different novel that never got off the ground. And since then there's been a big burst of creativity — this novel got written, as did a radio series, and some song lyrics for Ben Folds, and An Education, the movie for which I wrote the screenplay, got made. But there was a lot of sitting around feeling miserable before all that. And, yes, that will happen again. But hopefully not for a Tucker-length of time.

Tucker considers himself a phony because of the disparity between what he actually experienced in his breakup with Juliet and the emotions he conveys on his album about it. Is he right in this belief? How closely do the life and the art have to be aligned for the art to be "true"?

See, I think he's wrong about that. Annie has it right: there's an awful lot of artifice involved in art. And it's all so random anyway — some of my favourite works of art, especially movies and songs, were written and made by people looking to make some money. And we've all suffered through excruciatingly boring things that were emotionally honest and pure...It's a crapshoot, basically. But nobody can let out the unfiltered primal scream and hope to make a connection. It's all got to be shaped and messed with.

Tucker muses that in autobiographical songs, you have to make the present become the past. In other words, you have to turn every feeling or relationship into something that is over, so that you can be definitive about it. Whereas nothing in life is definitive until you die. Is this perhaps the fundamental distinction between art and life?

I suspect it is, and Tucker has this right. The trouble with material, subject matter, is that it has to mean something, whether it's autobiographical or not. So quite often you're looking for meaning in something that is open-ended, something where the meaning might change before too long. I'm not sure what that does to you as a person — whether it makes you a more or less functional human being. Less, probably. Less is usually the answer to that question.

What Our Readers Are Saying

Add a comment for a chance to win!
Average customer rating based on 7 comments:

Thomas Chandler, November 11, 2011 (view all comments by Thomas Chandler)
Hornby has a knack for writing characters which are flawed, likable and immensely recognizable.

In fact, Juliet, Naked is jammed with interestingly drawn characters, most of whom edge toward growth and redemption, though this isn't Hollywood and there are no Hollywood endings here.

Instead, Hornby writes deftly of a disparate group of people living at the intersection of pop culture, the Internet, sometimes-creepy fandom and everyday (boring) life, most of whom are drifting.

Tucker Crowe is an aging rock star who walked away from the business two decades ago after releasing a critically acclaimed "breakup" album. Pursued by a small coterie of fans who have endlessly analyzed his music, Crowe discovers he can no longer ignore his former wives or estranged children, and runs headlong into Annie, the former girlfriend of one of Crowe's biggest -- and borderline creepiest -- fans.

No coincidence is too great for Hornby to tackle, yet the overall effect of the book is wholly believable.

Neat trick, that.

Hornby remains a favorite writer and Juliet, Naked doesn't disappoint. The dialog snaps and crackles and you simply can't ignore the universal traits he infuses into his characters. More than once I found myself glancing at the page count, wishing it wasn't all going to end soon, and I give it five stars.
Was this comment helpful? | Yes | No
Thomas Chandler, November 2, 2011 (view all comments by Thomas Chandler)
Hornby has a knack for writing characters which are flawed, likable and immensely recognizable.

In fact, Juliet, Naked is jammed with interestingly drawn characters, most of whom edge toward growth and redemption, though this isn't Hollywood and there are no Hollywood endings here.

Instead, Hornby writes deftly of a disparate group of people living at the intersection of pop culture, the Internet, sometimes-creepy fandom and everyday (boring) life, most of whom are drifting.

Tucker Crowe is an aging rock star who walked away from the business two decades ago after releasing a critically acclaimed "breakup" album. Pursued by a small coterie of fans who have endlessly analyzed his music, Crowe discovers he can no longer ignore his former wives or estranged children, and runs headlong into Annie, the former girlfriend of one of Crowe's biggest -- and borderline creepiest -- fans.

No coincidence is too great for Hornby to tackle, yet the overall effect of the book is wholly believable.

Neat trick, that.

Hornby remains a favorite writer and Juliet, Naked doesn't disappoint. The dialog snaps and crackles and you simply can't ignore the universal traits he infuses into his characters. More than once I found myself glancing at the page count, wishing it wasn't all going to end soon, and I give it five stars.
Was this comment helpful? | Yes | No
LukinTimer, January 1, 2011 (view all comments by LukinTimer)
Music. It makes my world go around... I think that's why I've always related so well to Nick Hornby's music infused work. In Juliet, Naked he introduces us to the insular world of extreme super fans, people who spend all of their free time obsessing over a retired rock star, building a world around him which may, or may not have anything to do with reality. They just focus on him, so they don't have to consider their own lives. I love the female protagonist, Hornby's quirky perspective and wit... and the fact that I picked it up and couldn't put it down. Reminded me of college when I would just read for days on end. But mostly this made me laugh because I know some of these people, and have, for very limited periods of time (thankfully!), been one myself. I so get this book.
Was this comment helpful? | Yes | No
View all 7 comments

Product Details

ISBN:
9781594484773
Author:
Hornby, Nick
Publisher:
Riverhead Books
Author:
D'Erasmo, Stacey
Subject:
Literary
Subject:
Literature-A to Z
Edition Description:
Trade paper
Publication Date:
20100931
Binding:
TRADE PAPER
Grade Level:
from 12
Language:
English
Pages:
256
Dimensions:
8 x 5.31 in 1 lb
Age Level:
from 18

Other books you might like

  1. The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games #1)
    Used Trade Paper $4.50
  2. Lotta Jansdotter's Handmade Living:... Sale Hardcover $10.98

Related Subjects


Fiction and Poetry » Literature » A to Z

Juliet, Naked Used Trade Paper
0 stars - 0 reviews
$6.95 In Stock
Product details 256 pages Riverhead Books - English 9781594484773 Reviews:
"Review A Day" by , "If High Fidelity was 'Meet the Beatles,' fresh and catchy, then Juliet, Naked is 'Abbey Road,' less fresh, more complex, but still rock 'n' roll to the ears of music fans." (read the entire Oregonian review)
"Review" by , "Hornby's books are almost shamefully readable....[H]is characters are always richly, sympathetically drawn....[Juliet, Naked is] tinged with despair, and though the ending offers little by way of hope, its bittersweet ambiguity lends it maturity."
"Review" by , "[M]arvelous characters and comic, charming moments — exactly why many readers will continue to love Hornby."
"Review" by , "Juliet, Naked has all of the strengths readers expect from Hornby. It is funny. Despite the humorlessness of some of the characters, there are fine comic episodes, many of them courtesy of the sad losers who spend their time fantasizing about Tucker Crowe."
"Review" by , "By the end of...Nick Hornby's engaging and entertaining novel about a reclusive singer/songwriter, I wished I could download Tucker Crowe's albums. But for now, readers will just have to imagine the soundtrack."
"Review" by , "In between the delightful writing, spot-on comedy and incisive characterizations that mark Juliet, Naked, Hornby once again zeroes in on the age-old question: What do boy-men want?"
"Synopsis" by , The New York Times-bestselling author of About a Boy and High Fidelity returns to his roots — music and messy relationships — in this funny and touching novel which thoughtfully and sympathetically looks at how lives can be wasted but how they are never beyond redemption.
"Synopsis" by ,
This breakout novel from a brilliant stylist—dropping us into the life a female rock star—centers on that moment when we decide whether to go all-in or give up our dreams
"Synopsis" by ,
“Ingeniously conceived . . . D’Erasmo is a gifted and skillful writer.” — New York Times

“Exquisite . . . Anna Brundage is so beautifully realized that I wanted to download her music on iTunes.” — Los Angeles Times

“D’Erasmo’s writing exhibits a life-and-death intimacy that grabs at us.” — USA Today

Anna Brundage is a rock star, tall and sexy, with a powerhouse voice and a shocking mane of red hair. She came out of nowhere, an instant indie sensation, but went down as fast as she went up, walking off the scene for seven years. Now forty-four, without a record deal or clamoring fans, she sells a piece of her famous father’s art to finance a new album and a European comeback tour. This may be her last chance to claim the life she’s struggled for, the life she’s not sure she can sustain. Anna falls easily back into the ways of the road — sex with strangers, the search for the perfect moment onstage. Wonderland is a riveting look at the life of a musician and the moving story of a woman’s unconventional path, and it is a glimpse of how it feels when a wish comes true.

spacer
spacer
  • back to top

FOLLOW US ON...

     
Powell's City of Books is an independent bookstore in Portland, Oregon, that fills a whole city block with more than a million new, used, and out of print books. Shop those shelves — plus literally millions more books, DVDs, and gifts — here at Powells.com.