The Fictioning Horror Sale
 
 

From the Authors

Interviews


Original Essays


Powell's Q&A


Tech Q&A


Kids' Q&A


spacer

PowellsBooks.Blog

Authors, readers, critics, media — and booksellers.

 

Negative (or Is That Realistic?) about Positive Thinking

Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined AmericaBright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America by Barbara Ehrenreich

Reviewed by Kassten Alonso
The Oregonian

In Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Notion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America, Barbara Ehrenreich reprises her role as Dorothy swishing back the curtain on a great and powerful given: "Americans are a 'positive' people." Sunny, self-confident optimism defines us as individuals and as a nation. Humbug. Ehrenreich wants us to pay close attention to the truth behind the hype -- positive thinking is hurting America, from obliging one another to turn that frown upside-down, to 2008's financial meltdown.

Positive thinking as an ideology began in the 19th century. Christened New Thought, it was a backlash to the doctrine of Calvinism, with its emphasis on predestination and salvation through the grace of God alone, i.e., all work and no play. The Law of Attraction -- "You can have anything by focusing your mind on it" -- gave New Thought a mystical aroma that proponents of pop positivity have sought to rationalize.

"Flapdoodle," crows Ehrenreich, and the fun begins. Like flying monkeys tearing apart the Scarecrow, she shreds theories based on quantum physics (neuronal impulses are far too large to be influenced by quantum effects), magnetism (the magnetic properties of thought are swamped by competing magnetisms -- like the Earth's!), and magic (pay no attention to that man behind the curtain).

Ehrenreich likewise thrashes from top to bottom "the motivators and gurus of positivity," from Rhonda Byrne, author of The Secret, to prosperity preachers like Joel Osteen. Osteen makes a juicy target, sidestepping as he does sin and salvation in favor of the "prosperity gospel" -- "You can have that new car or house or necklace, because God wants to 'prosper you.'" In spurning Osteen as a heretical fake, Ehrenreich fights dirty, mocking Osteen's height (he's shorter in person) and his mullet (it's longer).

Ehrenreich claims she approached her initial meeting with Martin Seligman, the father of positive psychology, "with trepidation," yet we almost expect her to say, "Just one more thing...." a la Lt. Columbo, as she tries to pin down the exact measurements of Seligman's "equation" for happiness, a contrivance that makes him "look like the Wizard of Oz."

The refutation and character assassination, while entertaining, serve to show how positive thinking is as rickety a construct as the Wizard, merely masking insecurities about a world we can't really control. So complete is Ehrenreich's argument that she plays her own devil's advocate: positive thinking requires self-deception, "a constant effort to repress or block out unpleasant possibilities and 'negative' thoughts" -- like those created by scathing social critiques.

Bright-Sided isn't likely to trouble the sleep of Osteen; it may irritate Seligman. But what of "positive theology's" congregations? The adherents of motivational speakers? The worker bees keeping corporations alive while expecting any moment to get kicked out of the hive? Will they get the memo?

Those readers who've "gone so far down this yellow brick road that 'positive' seems to us the way you should be" may bite their nails over the demystification in Bright-Sided. Ehrenreich's advice on where to go from here is a workable antidote to the pursuit of secret formulas that don't exist.

Books mentioned in this post




3 Responses to "Negative (or Is That Realistic?) about Positive Thinking"

  1.  
    mjh October 22nd, 2009 at 6:14 am

    What a great, concise and snarky review. I am a fan of BE but must admit I am predisposd to agree with her thesis before I even read the book.

    That said, of the several review os this book I have read, this is by far the most well written.

  2.  
    Irwin Moss October 22nd, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    What a breath of fresh air!! The Pollyana Positive table thumpers have had a lifetime of diluting truth and skepticism in favor of of bland blind "Simon says." If you are not a "team player" you are negative and a pariah.

    Seems to me they are afraid of dissent or disagreement, after all they require thinking.

    Live on denial, you will die on denial. Seems to me that all too many postitive thumpers don't know how to say, "No!"

  3.  
    Bernard Chasan October 22nd, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    If I had to choose sides I would take Ehrenreich's . Fortunately I do not have to choose sides and Ehrenreich's HIGHER NEGATIVE WISDOM is simply the other side of the mindless positive coin. Some sort of balance based on an intelligent assessment - and a reluctance to follow mindless dogmas is what is needed.
    A little optimism and a reluctance to accept victim status are good things for individuals and societies.

Post a comment:

 
Get Your Gravatar

  1. Please note:
  2. All comments require moderation by Powells.com staff.
  3. Comments submitted on weekends might take until Monday to appear.
PowellsBooks.Blog uses Gravatar to allow you to personalize the icon that appears beside your name when you post. If you don't have one already, get your Gravatar today!
spacer
spacer
  • back to top
Follow us on...




Powell's City of Books is an independent bookstore in Portland, Oregon, that fills a whole city block with more than a million new, used, and out of print books. Shop those shelves — plus literally millions more books, DVDs, and gifts — here at Powells.com.