Synopses & Reviews
The debate over affirmative action has raged for over four decades, with little give on either side. Most agree that it began as noble effort to jump-start racial integration; many believe it devolved into a patently unfair system of quotas and concealment. Now, with the Supreme Court set to rule on a case that could sharply curtail the use of racial preferences in American universities, law professor Richard Sander and legal journalist Stuart Taylor offer a definitive account of what affirmative action has become, showing that while the objective is laudable, the effects have been anything but.
Sander and Taylor have long admired affirmative actions original goals, but after many years of studying racial preferences, they have reached a controversial but undeniable conclusion: that preferences hurt underrepresented minorities far more than they help them. At the heart of affirmative actions failure is a simple phenomenon called mismatch. Using dramatic new data and numerous interviews with affected former students and university officials of color, the authors show how racial preferences often put students in competition with far better-prepared classmates, dooming many to fall so far behind that they can never catch up. Mismatch largely explains why, even though black applicants are more likely to enter college than whites with similar backgrounds, they are far less likely to finish; why there are so few black and Hispanic professionals with science and engineering degrees and doctorates; why black law graduates fail bar exams at four times the rate of whites; and why universities accept relatively affluent minorities over working class and poor people of all races.
Sander and Taylor believe it is possible to achieve the goal of racial equality in higher education, but they argue that alternative policiessuch as full public disclosure of all preferential admission policies, a focused commitment to improving socioeconomic diversity on campuses, outreach to minority communities, and a renewed focus on K-12 schooling will go farther in achieving that goal than preferences, while also allowing applicants to make informed decisions. Bold, controversial, and deeply researched, Mismatch calls for a renewed examination of this most divisive of social programsand for reforms that will help realize the ultimate goal of racial equality.
Review
Racial discrimination is unlawful and has been rightly repudiated by the American people. The corrupt silence concerning such discrimination in college and university admissions suggests that at some level these people know they are doing something for which they should be ashamed. Unfortunately they are doing their intended beneficiaries no favors. Thats proved beyond demur by Sander and Taylors
Mismatch.”
Michael Barone, Creators Syndicate
[Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students Its Intended to Help, and Why Universities Wont Admit It is] a fine book, and the evidence gathered under the first part of the subtitle is convincing.... I was even more intrigued by the second part — about the reluctance of the universities and respectable opinion in general to recognize the defects of the policy. Its a subject that cannot be discussed, least of all in the precincts of American institutions dedicated to fearless free inquiry.”
Clive Crook, Bloomberg View
Sander and Taylor attack affirmative action programs in a bold and comprehensive way.... General readers will learn much from this work, though it is recommended more for graduate students in public policy as well as students and faculty at law schools.”
Choice
The evidence on [the wrongs perpetrated by affirmative action programs] is hotly disputed, but Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr. make a compelling case in their book Mismatch.”
David Brooks, New York Times
The best argument against affirmative action is presented in Mismatch, by Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor. The subtitle says it all: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students Its Intended to Help and Why Universities Wont Admit It.... If Sander and Taylor are right, affirmative action may be a policy that hurts Asians and helps no one. But this is an uncomfortable thing to say. For one thing, we dont know that theyre right — there is a hot debate over their thesis. But even if they are right, the remedy is bound to be very divisive..... Its worth noting that it should be relatively easy to tell whether Sander and Taylor are right, except that its very hard to get the data. And its hard to get the data because institutions fight like hell to keep it from being released. Its no surprise that we cant all agree on a remedy for historical racism. But it should be easy to agree to study the problem.”
Megan McArdle, The Daily Beast
In the real world, there is little doubt that racial preferences are a failure. In their judicious book Mismatch, Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr. catalog the twisted effect of preferences on schools beholden to them.”
Rich Lowry, National Review Online
[Stuart Taylors] book is wonderful.... [Its] the most thoughtful account of the possible policy disadvantages of affirmative action in putting students who are mismatched...at universities where theyre not prepared.”
Jeffrey Rosen, on NPRs Diane Rehm Show
In their outstanding book, Mismatch, Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr. document the paradoxical results of giving large preferences to racial and other minorities. Sander and Taylor argue persuasively that the trouble with preferences is not the injustice done to people like Abigail Fisher, who was denied admission to the University of Texas while less qualified black and Hispanic applicants were accepted — though that is unfair — but also the harm it does to those to whom such preferences are extended.”
Mona Charen, Creators Syndicate
This lucid, data-rich book is simply the best researched and most convincing analysis ever done of affirmative action in higher education, a work at once impeccably scholarly and entirely accessible to anyone interested in the social and legal ramifications of well-intentioned policies that, as the authors show, have a boomerang effect on the intended beneficiaries.”
Judge Richard A. Posner
As a high-profile defender of affirmative action, I used to think the so-called mismatch problem was a bit overblown. Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor have caused me to think again. How many bright and promising minority students, we must ask, have failed because they were steeredwith the best intentions, of course — into elite schools for which they were less prepared academically than most of their classmates? What better ways can we devise to boost academic achievement and expand the pool of qualified students of all races? We don't do future generations of students any favors by trying to ignore this issue or pretend it doesn't exist. If common-sense moderates don't step up and engage this debate, we only allow extremists to take control of it.”
Clarence Page, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for the Chicago Tribune
This book probably will make constitutional history. Written at the intersection of social science and law, its data conclusively demonstrate the damage that has been done to intended beneficiaries by courts decisions that have made racial preferences in college admissions an exception to the Constitutions guarantee of equal protection of the laws.”
George F. Will
As a longtime defender of affirmative action, I used to think the so-called mismatch problem was an overhyped myth. But Sander and Taylor make a convincing case and, more important, good recommendations to keep affirmative action alive — without preferences.”
Clarence Page, Chicago Tribune
[Sander and Taylor] are intelligent critics who support the modest use of race in admissions but think very large preferences have harmful effects.... [T]his book is at its best when it skewers college and university officials — who feel morally superior for defending affirmative action — for in fact pursuing what Yale Law professor Stephen Carter has called racial justice on the cheap.”
Richard Kahlenberg, The New Republic
[A] powerful new book that explains the nefarious consequences of [undergraduate and graduate admissions programs] for the supposed beneficiaries of racial preferences. The dirty secret — not a dirty little secret, but a dirty huge secret — is how massive in size their racial preferences are.”
Ed Whelan, National Review Online, Bench Memos
The authors offer extensive data in support of their conclusions that the present system is not serving those students well.... This information will be argued over all the same, but the authors evenhanded suggestion that what might be a better strategy is to raise educational attainment by investing more in elementary and secondary education for lower-income students — targeting economic need before racial identity, as they put it — seems unobjectionable on the face. The subject may be hard to talk about, but it must be, and this is a valuable contribution to opening that needed discussion.”
Kirkus Reviews
Mismatch is a story of good intentions gone terribly awry. Sander and Taylor document beyond disagreement how university admissions offices racial quotas and preferences systematically put black and Hispanic students in schools where they are far less well-prepared than others.”
Michael Barone, Washington Examiner
An influential book.”
Michael Kinsley, Bloomberg View
[A] wealth of information.... Dr. Sander and Mr. Taylor present an excellent explanation of what is currently meant by affirmative action and demonstrate how it has been abused.”
New York Journal of Books
[A] remarkable new book. [Sander and Taylor] have shifted the focus of the entire debate. Bypassing the standard arguments about core principles, their extensive research focuses on the actual effects of racial preferences on the students they were intended to benefit. Drawing upon data never before available to independent-minded scholars, they find, to their dismay, that such policies actually do more harm than good to black and Hispanic students. From now on, it will be impossible to have a serious debate on this subject without extensive reference to the evidence provided in this volume.”
National Review
[W]hat Mr. Sander and Mr. Taylor have accomplished here is incredibly impressive. The authors have done an excellent job of pulling together the available research, and Mr. Sander in particular has been dogged in his pursuit of fresh numbers
].... Mr. Sander and Mr. Taylor, of course, have their share of critics, and Mismatch will not be the last word on this subject. But they have put the nations universities in a put-up-or-shut-up situation: They can either admit that preferences do harm, or they can release the data that prove otherwise.”
Washington Times
Sander and Taylor have marshaled a formidable amount of evidence to substantiate the mismatch theory, and...the payoff is persuasiveness.... Mismatch is very much in the tradition of the muckraking that Lincoln Steffens did a century ago when he took on the corruption in American cities; indeed, the book could be titled The Shame of the Colleges.”
Wall Street Journal
[A] sober, reasoned, more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger critique of affirmative action.... One of the virtues of this book is that it is based on a rigorous, dispassionate examination of the facts. It is packed with easy-to-follow graphics and statistical analysis, as well as extensive case evidence based on interviews.”
The American Spectator
The highly anticipated Sander-Taylor book, Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students Its Intended to Help, and Why Universities Wont Admit It, was published Tuesday, on the eve of the oral argument in Fisher v. Texas. It is, in a word, magisterial. No matter what the Supremes decide, this work will be regarded as a major — perhaps the major — discussion of the use and abuse of race in American higher education, easily displacing Bowen and Boks unduly influential The Shape of the River, which it respectfully but effectively eviscerates.... As someone who has attempted to follow racial issues closely, I can assure you that you will learn, as I did, a great deal that you didnt know and be impressed by the wealth of social science evidence ably and judiciously presented to support and extend the mismatch theory.... Mismatch, in short, is a major contribution to the debate over affirmative action, a model of vigorous but fair and balanced argument and analysis.”
John S. Rosenberg, Minding the Campus
The devastating new book Mismatch
has so much overwhelming evidence on the harm done to students who are black, Hispanic, or from other under-represented minorities, that it will be hard for anyone with pretensions of honesty to be able to deny that painful fact.... Sander and Taylor have written an outstanding book that deserves to be read and pondered in many places for many years. They have performed a major service for all those who have an open mind on affirmative action.”
Thomas Sowell, Claremont Review of Books
[An] eye-opening new book.... The argument Sander and Taylor make is unpopular among academic administrators, and, they illustrate, it has been systematically suppressed. But the evidence that they present makes obvious that the solution to educational inequity is not to be found in continuing to mask it with racial admissions preferences that harm students.”
Science Careers
Anyone who wants an honest look at the hard facts about racial preferences in admissions to colleges and universities will find it — perhaps for the first time — in a book titled Mismatch by Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr.... The careful analysis of documented facts makes Mismatch a rare and valuable book for people who want to think.”
Thomas Sowell, Creators Syndicate
Drawing from rich and robust empirical research, interviews by students, faculty and administrators, and historical and legal analyses, Sander and Taylor offer a compelling argument that encourages the nation to be more mindful in how institutions serve all students in a manner that is both equitable and effective.... Sander and Taylor leave no stone unturned. This text is meticulously researched and well-written, and it should be welcomed in all circles debating the merits of affirmative action.”
Teachers College Record
[An] eye-opening critique of affirmative action.... Sander and Taylor present a lucid, accessible analysis of affirmative action in higher education and the groupthink enshrouding it, one that grapples with its failures while eschewing genetic determinism. Their well-argued challenge to the prevailing orthodoxy on racial preferences is sure to provoke controversy and rethinking just as the Supreme Court hears an affirmative action case involving the University of Texas-Austin.”
Publishers Weekly
Mismatch provides a convincing and useful survey of the problems surrounding affirmative action.”
Commentary
Review
and#8220;Drawing on the extensive case analyses, and embedding herself in core theoretical questions surrounding culture, power and diversity, Berrey provides an important snapshot of historical and contemporary claims-making about inequality and institutional practices in higher education, housing and work. Fascinating and important in these regards is Berrey's simultaneous attention to the hopes but also pitfalls of current diversity effortsand#8212;efforts that are forged in an arena of definitional ambiguity, sometimes clarified through the courts, and filtered through popular and media perceptions. This is a must read for culture, diversity and organizational scholars, as well for practitioners and those with specific interests in education, work, housing and inequality.and#8221;
Review
and#8220;This is a wonderful book.and#160;It makes importantand#160;contributions to cultural analysis, organizational change, social movements, and race and ethnic relations. The in-depth, insightful, balanced, andand#160;theoretically grounded ethnography of the corporation is especiallyand#160;valuable. Berreyand#8217;s close-up examination of how it looks on the ground, and the variety of cross-pressuresand#160;affecting the implementation of these policies, is worth the price of the book alone. Berrey writes as a sympathetic observer, with an agenda of understanding,and#160;rather than asand#160;an advocate of diversity policies or a close-minded critic.and#8221;
Review
"In this important book Berrey shows how the demands for inclusion of the racially oppressed during the Civil Rights Era were translated in universities, communities, and corporations into practices to keep the powerful in control. Berrey has deconstructed the symbolic politics of diversity and helped us understand the fundamental importance of substantive rather than formal diversity."
Review
and#8220;While others have bemoaned the conceptual shortcomings of diversity talk in universities and the workplace, Berrey makes a remarkable contribution in providing a series of stunning empirical examples of precisely how and why this rhetoricand#8212;with all of its good intentionsand#8212;can limit substantive pursuits of equality, reaffirm status quo market orderings, and further entrench racial hierarchies. This insightful study cautions readers to think twice before uncritically embracing the language and politics of diversity and offers a much needed empirical basis for shifting the discourse of equality from the thin individualist aesthetics of identity distribution to much more robust group-oriented pursuits of justice, accountability, and inclusion.and#8221;
Review
andldquo;From the language of Supreme Court opinions to conversations held in private and public, we have disconnected the idea of andlsquo;diversityandrsquo; from our nationandrsquo;s history of slavery and racial discrimination and obscured its profound importance to American society.and#160;In her in-depth study, Berrey explains the urgency of rejecting this distortion.and#160;Her investigation of the term, who employs it, and to what end underscores the need for uninhibited discourse about racial hierarchies and inequality.and#160;Berrey adds a vibrant, vital, and incisive voice to the discussion.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;The Enigma of Diversityandrsquo;s most important contribution is to carefully trace the symbolic politics of racial progress produced by specific decisions made in organizational settings in higher education, urban development and the corporate world. Berreyandrsquo;s keen eye dissects how various meanings of diversity offered by competing actors have led to the current racial order. Her compelling analysis sheds new light on processes of transformation of group boundaries, the destigmatization of African-Americans, and the limits of the diversity paradigm for a genuine transformation of racial inequality in American society. and#160;Her book is an important addition to the literature on the production of racial and class inequality.andrdquo;
Synopsis
Diversity these days is a hallowed American value, widely shared and honored. Thatandrsquo;s a remarkable change from the Civil Rights eraandmdash;but does this public commitment to diversity constitute a civil rights victory? What does diversity mean in contemporary America, and what are the effects of efforts to support it?
Ellen Berrey digs deep into those questions in The Enigma of Diversity. Drawing on six years of fieldwork and historical sources dating back to the 1950s and making extensive use of three case studies from widely varying arenasandmdash;housing redevelopment in Chicagoandrsquo;s Rogers Park neighborhood, affirmative action in the University of Michiganandrsquo;s admissions program, and the workings of the human resources department at a Fortune 500 companyandmdash;Berrey explores the complicated, contradictory, and even troubling meanings and uses of diversity as it is invoked by different groups for different, often symbolic ends. In each case, diversity affirms inclusiveness, especially in the most coveted jobs and colleges, yet it resists fundamental change in the practices and cultures that are the foundation of social inequality. Berrey shows how this has led racial progress itself to be reimagined, transformed from a legal fight for fundamental rights to a celebration of the competitive advantages afforded by cultural differences.
Powerfully argued and surprising in its conclusions, The Enigma of Diversity reveals the true cost of the public embrace of diversity: the taming of demands for racial justice.
About the Author
Richard H. Sander is a law professor and economist at UCLA who worked as a community organizer on Chicago's South Side, a civil rights activist in Los Angeles, and is a well-known scholar on race and higher education. He lives in Los Angeles.
Stuart Taylor, Jr., a former New York Times Supreme Court reporter and co-author of the critically acclaimed Until Proven Innocent, is a National Journal contributor and Brookings fellow. He has long been one of the nations leading legal journalists. He lives in Washington, D.C.
Table of Contents
Introduction Oneand#160;and#160;and#160;and#160; The Symbolic Politics of Racial Progress
Part I: Undergraduate Admissions at the University of Michigan
Twoand#160;and#160;and#160;and#160; and#147;Academically Excellent and Diverseand#8221;
Threeand#160;and#160; Gratz, Grutter, and the Public Relations of Defending Affirmative Action
Part II: Housing Politics in Rogers Park
Fourand#160;and#160;and#160;and#160; and#147;The Most Diverse Neighborhood in Chicagoand#8221;
Fiveand#160;and#160;and#160;and#160; Gentrification, Displacement, and the Color-Blind Opposition to Subsidized Housing
Part III: Human Resource Management in Starr Corporation
Sixand#160;and#160;and#160;and#160;and#160;and#160; and#147;Diversity Is a Strength of Starr Corporationand#8221;
Sevenand#160; Diversity Management, Shareholder Capitalism, and the Biases of Meritocracy
Conclusion: Neoliberalism, Color Blindness, and Inequality in the Age of Diversity
Acknowledgments
Methodological Appendix
Notes
References
Index