Synopses & Reviews
A lively examination of the most legendary (and least understood) rivalry in the annals of rock and#8217;nand#8217; roll: and#8220;andlt;Iandgt;Beatles vs. Stonesandlt;/Iandgt; is one of the best rock biographies I have seen this yearand#8230;If you thought you knew everything there was to know about these two groups, think againand#8221; (andlt;Iandgt;Seattle Post-Intelligencerandlt;/Iandgt;).andlt;BRandgt;andlt;BRandgt;In the 1960s an epic battle was waged between the two biggest bands in the worldand#8212;the lovable Beatles and the bad-boy Rolling Stones. Both groups liked to maintain that they werenand#8217;t really and#8220;rivalsand#8221;and#8212;that was just a media myth, they politely saidand#8212;and yet they plainly competed for commercial success and aesthetic credibility. On both sides of the Atlantic, fans often aligned themselves with one group or the other. In andlt;Iandgt;Beatles vs. Stonesandlt;/Iandgt;, John McMillian gets to the truth behind the ultimate rock and roll debate.andlt;BRandgt; andlt;BRandgt;Painting an eye-opening portrait of a generation dragged into an ideological battle between Flower Power and New Left militance, McMillian reveals how the Beatles-Stones rivalry was created by music managers intent on engineering a moneymaking empire. He explores how the Beatles were marketed as cute and amiable, when in fact they came from hardscrabble backgrounds in Liverpool. By contrast, the Stones were cast as an edgy, dangerous group, even though they mostly hailed from the chic London suburbs. For many years, writers and historians have associated the Beatles with the gauzy idealism of the and#8220;goodand#8221; sixties, placing the Stones as representatives of the dangerous and nihilistic and#8220;badand#8221; sixties. andlt;Iandgt;Beatles vs. Stonesandlt;/Iandgt; is and#8220;balanced, informed, yet still passionateand#8230;Even the most gnarled and intransigent veterans of the debate will emerge enlightened by this bookand#8230;.McMillian negotiates these thickets with insight, care, and a willingness to unsettle clichand#233;sand#8221; (andlt;I andgt;The New York Times Book Reviewandlt;/Iandgt;).
Review
and#8220;Balanced, informed, yet still passionate . . . Even the most gnarled and intransigent veterans of the Beatles-Stones debates will emerge enlightened by this book. . . . [McMillian] negotiates these thickets with insight, care, and a willingness to unsettle clichand#233;s.and#8221;
Review
"Smart, fantastically gossipy, and utterly compelling . . . The best parts of McMillian's story are his careful re-creations of various Beatles-Stones interactions"
Review
and#8220;Fun and eye-opening . . . If you thought you knew everything there was to know about these two groups, think again. . . . John McMillian has done something I thought was no longer possible. He has written a book with a fresh perspective about these rock legends. . . . andlt;Iandgt;Beatles vs. Stonesandlt;/Iandgt; is one of the best rock biographies I have seen this year."
Review
and#8220;Engaging . . . Nuanced . . . McMillian uses historical rigor to pull this conversation out from the jaws of celebrity memoir. His account pulls no punches, and injects new vitality into a well-worn subject. . . . McMillianand#8217;s greatest success here is his ability to dispense with the tidy, nostalgia-soaked versions of the counterculture that are so prevalent in rock history.and#8221;
Review
and#8220;What is there that's left to be said about such a tired debate in 2013? As it turns out, there's still plenty to be said. . . . andlt;Iandgt;Beatles vs. Stonesandlt;/Iandgt; takes on a wholly different angle on how the greatest rock 'n' roll rivalry of all time was fostered by the fans, the music industry, the media, and by the bands themselves. By bringing to light mounds of source materials that most scholars and critics have never mined, namely the alternative newspapers and fan magazines of the late '60s and early '70s, McMillian taps into the stories of both bands as they unfold. By tracing their evolutions, side-by-side, as they appeared in the underground publications of the times, McMillian offers fresh insight into the dynamics of both groups as they grew and changed, with a real-time and palpable sense of excitement.and#8221;
Review
and#8220;Incisive . . . Masterful . . . McMillian works a certain magic here. . . . andlt;iandgt;Beatles vs. Stones andlt;/iandgt;is the best kind of pop culture study, revivifying familiar material while stimulating the reader to question his own assumptions and tastes.and#8221;
Review
and#8220;A delightful read . . . Iand#8217;ve no idea whether universities still offer classes on the great rock and roll acts of the and#8217;60s and and#8217;70s, but McMillianand#8217;s andlt;iandgt;Beatles vs. Stones andlt;/iandgt;ought to be included in any such curriculum.and#8221;
Synopsis
A lively examination of the most legendary (and least understood) rivalry in the annals of rock 'n' roll: "Beatles vs. Stones is one of the best rock biographies I have seen this year...If you thought you knew everything there was to know about these two groups, think again" (Seattle Post-Intelligencer).
In the 1960s an epic battle was waged between the two biggest bands in the world--the lovable Beatles and the bad-boy Rolling Stones. Both groups liked to maintain that they weren't really "rivals"--that was just a media myth, they politely said--and yet they plainly competed for commercial success and aesthetic credibility. On both sides of the Atlantic, fans often aligned themselves with one group or the other. In Beatles vs. Stones, John McMillian gets to the truth behind the ultimate rock and roll debate.
Painting an eye-opening portrait of a generation dragged into an ideological battle between Flower Power and New Left militance, McMillian reveals how the Beatles-Stones rivalry was created by music managers intent on engineering a moneymaking empire. He explores how the Beatles were marketed as cute and amiable, when in fact they came from hardscrabble backgrounds in Liverpool. By contrast, the Stones were cast as an edgy, dangerous group, even though they mostly hailed from the chic London suburbs. For many years, writers and historians have associated the Beatles with the gauzy idealism of the "good" sixties, placing the Stones as representatives of the dangerous and nihilistic "bad" sixties. Beatles vs. Stones is "balanced, informed, yet still passionate...Even the most gnarled and intransigent veterans of the debate will emerge enlightened by this book....McMillian negotiates these thickets with insight, care, and a willingness to unsettle cliches" (The New York Times Book Review).
About the Author
John McMillian is assistant professor of history at Georgia State University and author of the critically acclaimed andlt;iandgt;Smoking Typewriters: The Sixties Underground Press and the Rise of Alternative Media in Americaandlt;/iandgt;. His writing has appeared in scholarly journals, magazines, and major newspapers. He lives in Atlanta, Georgia.