Synopses & Reviews
How did the Depression-era folk-song collector Alan Lomax end up with a songwriting credit on Jay-Zandrsquo;s song andldquo;Takeoverandrdquo;? Why doesnandrsquo;t Clyde Stubblefield, the primary drummer on James Brown recordings from the late 1960s such as andldquo;Funky Drummerandrdquo; and andldquo;Cold Sweat,andrdquo; get paid for other musiciansandrsquo; frequent use of the beats he performed on those songs? The music industryandrsquo;s approach to digital samplingandmdash;the act of incorporating snippets of existing recordings into new onesandmdash;holds the answers. Exploring the complexities and contradictions in how samples are licensed, Kembrew McLeod and Peter DiCola interviewed more than 100 musicians, managers, lawyers, industry professionals, journalists, and scholars. Based on those interviews,
Creative License puts digital sampling into historical, cultural, and legal context. It describes hip-hop during its sample-heavy golden age in the 1980s and early 1990s, the lawsuits that shaped U.S. copyright law on sampling, and the labyrinthine licensing process that musicians must now navigate. The authors argue that the current system for licensing samples is inefficient and limits creativity. For instance, by estimating the present-day licensing fees for the Beastie Boysandrsquo;
Paulandrsquo;s Boutique (1989) and Public Enemyandrsquo;s
Fear of a Black Planet (1990), two albums from hip-hopandrsquo;s golden age, the authors show that neither album could be released commercially today. Observing that the same dynamics that create problems for remixers now reverberate throughout all culture industries, the authors conclude by examining ideas for reform.
Interviewees include David Byrne, Cee Lo Green, George Clinton, De La Soul, DJ Premier, DJ Qbert, Eclectic Method, El-P, Girl Talk, Matmos, Mix Master Mike, Negativland, Public Enemy, RZA, Clyde Stubblefield, T.S. Monk.
Review
andldquo;The fact that a seemingly simplistic artistic notionandmdash;of collecting, meshing, and arranging previously recorded soundsandmdash;would eventually result in a sharp and comprehensive book, Creative License, and companion film, Copyright Criminals, is mind boggling. This study is a work of art in itself, so solid that it may leave no other choice but to be sampled as well.andrdquo;andmdash;Chuck D, co-founder of Public Enemy
Review
andldquo;[A] very readable laymanandrsquo;s guide to the legal framework underpinning the American sampling regime. . . . [A] great addition to the growing library of works showing that the endless addition of expanded property rights does nothing to andlsquo;promote the progressandrsquo; of music, stifles expression and serves only to let Jimmy Page buy another Aleister Crowley first edition.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;Do you ever listen to records like the Beastie Boys' Paulandrsquo;s Boutique or Public Enemyandrsquo;s Fear of a Black Planet and wonder why they sound so different from todayandrsquo;s hip-hop? It turns out one of the biggest reasons may be copyright law. . . . McLeod and DiCola always keep an eye on the bigger picture. They are as interested in the cultural as the legal, and the book succeeds greatly in broad terms as a history of music sampling.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;Creative License is for musicians, music fans and anyone interested in the history of hip-hop, sampling, and mash-ups, as well as for those who are curious about the evolution of US copyright and licensing laws. Itandrsquo;s also incredibly timely, given the present climate of our musical culture, when the internet has made samplingandmdash;in every mediumandmdash;a way of life.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;Creative License is recommended not just for music geeks or music business geeks, but for anyone interested in law, the arts or both. Well written and treated with care, McLeod and DiColaandrsquo;s work should be read on college campuses around the country.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;Creative License is a fantastic and deep look at the business, art, culture, ethics, history and future of musical sampling. The authorsandmdash;respected academics/writers/filmmakersandmdash;undertook to interview a really amazingly wide spectrum of people involved in music production, and what emerges is a clear picture of how legal rulings, historical accidents, musical history, good intentions, naked greed, and conflicts of all kind came to produce our current, very broken system for musical sampling. . . . It's a fascinating and important read.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;Readers whose experience started with andlsquo;Canandrsquo;t Touch This,andrsquo; matured with The Gray Album and ended with All Day can expect to have their knowledge substantially broadened. Music junkies, intellectual property lawyers and cultural critics will journey into andlsquo;enemyandrsquo; territory. The authors give voices and personalities to sampling artists, holders of publishing and reproduction rights, and the sampled artists who have become a natural resource for the other two groups.andldquo;
Review
andldquo;Kembrew McLeod and Peter DiCola have written a masterful exploration of the complex creative, financial, and legal issues raised by digital sampling. Their book should be required reading for anyone with a serious interest in music copyright.andrdquo;andmdash;Jessica Litman, author of Digital Copyright
Review
andldquo;Creative License provides a solid explanation of music copyright process and practice and the law for anyone from the legal novice to the full-time music lawyer.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;A methodical yet accessible exploration that addresses concerns from several perspectives and invites spirited discussion. Essential for students of intellectual property law, aspiring recording artists or producers, and hip-hop history buffs.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;With the high-cost, litigation-aware environment that has emerged around the art of sampling, many artists simply wonandrsquo;t sample any more. As the authors of this excellent book acknowledge. . . . This is not simply a book for people with an interest in hip hop production. It is a must for anyone who is interested in copyright stories so absurd that they reveal the contradictions and tensions at play when unclear and convoluted laws put creativity and commerce on a collision course.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;As someone who has studied the subject of digital sampling at some length, I am impressed with and grateful for this book by Kembrew McLeod and Peter DiCola. I am delighted to recommend Creative License, an engaging, provocative, and thoroughly researched study of a practice that is equally celebrated, maligned, and misunderstood.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;A smart, impeccably researched, clearly written book that guides the reader through the murky quagmire of musical copyright law and normative industry practices with wit and style.andrdquo;
Synopsis
Examines the legal, economic, and cultural stakes of music sampling from the differing perspectives of artists, music labels, copyright lawyers, managers, and music publishers.
Synopsis
Draws on interviews with more than 100 musicians, managers, lawyers, journalists, and scholars to critique the music industry s approach to digital sampling.
About the Author
Kembrew McLeod is Associate Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Iowa. He is the author of Freedom of Expressionandreg;: Resistance and Repression in the Age of Intellectual Property and Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law, and co-creator of the documentary film Copyright Criminals.
Peter DiCola is Assistant Professor at Northwestern University School of Law. He is a board member and former Research Director of the Future of Music Coalition.