Synopses & Reviews
The sociology of science is dominated today by relativists who boldly argue that the content of science is not influenced by evidence from the empirical world but is instead socially constructed in the laboratory.
Making Science is the first serious critique by a sociologist of the social constructivist position.
Stephen Cole begins by making a distinction between two kinds of knowledge: the core, which consists of those contributions that have passed the test of evaluation and are universally accepted as true and important, and the research frontier, which is composed of all work in progress that is still under evaluation. Of the thousands of scientific contributions made each year, only a handful end up in the core. What distinguishes those that are successful?
Agreeing with the constructivists, Cole argues that there exists no set of rules that enables scientists to certify the validity of frontier knowledge. This knowledge is "underdetermined" by the evidence, and therefore social factors--such as professional characteristics and intellectual authority--can and do play a crucial role in its evaluation. But Cole parts company with the constructivists when he asserts that it is impossible to understand which frontier knowledge wins a place in the core without first considering the cognitive characteristics of the contributions. He concludes that although the focus of scientific research, the rate of advance, and indeed the everyday making of science are influenced by social variables and processes, the content of the core of science is constrained by nature. In Making Science, Cole shows how social variables and cognitive variables interact in the evaluation of frontier knowledge.
Review
For the general audience, [Making Science] offers a broad analysis of realism and relativism in science and helps shake sociologists out of a simple, positivist view of science, scientists, and their conduct. For specialists in the sociology of science, Cole's new book brings to bear a demanding appraisal of constructivism, and perhaps most consequentially, it demonstrates the need for continuing assessment of science as an occupation, institution, and activity. Mary Frank Fox
Review
For the general audience, [Making Science] offers a broad analysis of realism and relativism in science and helps shake sociologists out of a simple, positivist view of science, scientists, and their conduct. For specialists in the sociology of science, Cole's new book brings to bear a demanding appraisal of constructivism, and perhaps most consequentially, it demonstrates the need for continuing assessment of science as an occupation, institution, and activity. -- Choice
Review
Presents a wealth of empirical material on the vast scope of anomalies and irregularities in the work of the scientific community. The survey includes a good deal of valuable material originating with the author and his collaborators. Contemporary Sociology
Synopsis
The sociology of science is dominated today by relativists who boldly argue that the content of science is not primarily determined by evidence from the empirical world but is instead sociallyconstructed in the laboratory. Making Scienceis the first serious critique by a sociologist of the social constructivist position. It argues that although the focus of scientific research, the rate ofscientific advance, and indeed the everyday making of science are influenced by social variables and processes, the content of the core of science is constrained by nature.
Description
Includes bibliographical references (p. [271]-281) and index.
About the Author
Stephen Cole is Professor of Sociology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.
SUNY-Stonybrook
Table of Contents
Preface
1. Nature and the Content of Science
2. Constructivist Problems in Accounting for Consensus
3. Constructivist Problems in Demonstrating Causality
4. Luck and Getting an NSF Grant
5. Consensus in the Natural and Social Sciences
6. Evaluation and the Characteristics of Scientists
7. Is Science Universalistic?
8. Conceptualizing and Studying Particularism in Science
9. Social Influences on the Rate of Scientiflc Advance
10. The Future of the Sociology of Science
Appendix: The COSPUP NSF Peer Review Experiment
Notes
References
Name Index
Subject Index