Synopses & Reviews
The protagonist of Tobias Wolff's shrewdly and at times devastatingly observed first novel is a boy at an elite prep school in 1960. He is an outsider who has learned to mimic the negligent manner of his more privileged classmates. Like many of them, he wants more than anything on earth to become a writer. But to do that he must first learn to tell the truth about himself.
The agency of revelation is the school literary contest, whose winner will be awarded an audience with the most legendary writer of his time. As the fever of competition infects the boy and his classmates, fraying alliances, exposing weaknesses, Old School explores the ensuing deceptions and betrayals with an unblinking eye and a bottomless store of empathy. The result is further evidence that Wolff is an authentic American master.
"Ingenious....A tour de force....Achieves a real profundity." The Boston Globe
"[A] marvelous novel with resonance for old and young alike. [Wolff's] storytelling is economical, his prose is elegant, and his meditations are utterly timeless. Some readers may wish to turn from the last page to the first and begin again." Keir Graff, Booklist
"A witty but ultimately rather pointless debut....Wolff writes well page by page....An odd pastiche that never coheres...Wolff offers some nice vignettes that add up to considerably less than the sum of their parts." Kirkus Reviews
"[A] fine offering, manly in spirit and style, less hangdog than the somewhat Carverian memoir....Wolff displays exceptional skill in capturing the small sights and sensations that evoke the whole rarefied world he's taking us back to..." Atlantic Monthly
"[A] lucid, deceptively sedate novel....Wolff...here offers a delicate, pointed meditation on the treacherous charms of art." Publishers Weekly
"It's not that Old School isn't perfectly readable and at times highly entertaining but it lacks the emotional chiaroscuro and effortless pacing of this author's best short stories and his classic 1989 memoir This Boy's Life..." Michiko Kakutani, The New York Times
"Wolff has delineated a glimpse of America on the threshold of transition, and he nails it clean, without resorting to triteness or sophistry or extraneous verbiage." Houston Chronicle
"In Old School, Wolff again proves himself a writer of the highest order: part storyteller, part philosopher, someone deeply engaged in asking hard questions that take a lifetime to resolve." Los Angeles Times
"A sharply drawn, acutely felt novel of moral inquiry....Wolff has put his readers in the landscape tracked across by writers as different as J. M. Coetzee, Philip Roth, and, going back, Conrad and Hawthorne." The Washington Post Book World
"The kind of deceptively quiet novel that deserves a second, slow reading. An homage to the power of story to move, to awaken and even to transform." Cleveland Plain Dealer
"You never quite know where memory and imagination meet in Old School, and Tobias Wolff has a grand old time toying with your suspicions....Wolff gets it right...about a time in life in which most things go unerringly wrong." The Oregonian (Portland, OR)
"With exquisite attention to detail, Wolff...evokes a time and place where the pursuit of literary excellence was nothing less than a sacred quest....Wolff creates a richly textured cast of characters..." San Antonio Express-News
"Reading this novel a few more times than I really had to, I've come to admire all the more the artful, understated play of cruelty as a binding element of the plot....The bygone time feels Roman, both proud and untrustworthy." Chicago Tribune
"It's 1961, and our narrator's final year at a very swanky, and very self-consciously literary, boarding school. The school's Little Lord Fauntleroys in-training are, with the exception of the narrator, rich, and they're all thoroughly enamored of the 'literary life.'...Remarkably, Old School
, while Tobias Wolff's seventh book, is his first novel. It's an elegant ode to writers, and to writing, from one of our most exquisite storytellers." Adrienne Miller, Esquire
(read the entire Esquire review
"Throughout Old School
, Wolff displays exceptional skill in capturing the small sights and sensations that evoke the whole rarefied world he's taking us back to....He conveys the sublimation and sexual messaging that occur all at once when the boys sing to a master's young wife ('It was a kind of ravishing'), and with the same exactitude discerns the boys' wary relations with one another....It can stand with the best of what some old boys (Louis Auchincloss, Richard Yates) have produced in a waning American genre." Thomas Mallon, The Atlantic Monthly
(read the entire Atlantic review
The author of the genre-defining memoir "This Boy's Life" now gives readers his first novel--at once a celebration of literature and delicate hymn to a lost innocence of American life and art.
About the Author
Tobias Wolff lives in Northern California and teaches at Stanford University. He has received the Rea Award for excellence in the short story, the Los Angeles Times Book Prize, and the PEN/Faulkner Award.
Reading Group Guide
1. What is the effect of the first-person narrative style Wolff has chosen for this novel? What kinds of information—or perspectives—does the reader have access to? On the other hand, what kinds of information does first-person narration deny the reader? What terms might describe the narrators voice? Why is this narrative style so appropriate for this story?
2. About his desire to win the competition that would give him an audience with Robert Frost, the narrator says, “My aspirations were mystical. I wanted to receive the laying on of hands that had written living stories and poems, hands that had touched the hands of other writers. I wanted to be anointed” [p. 7]. Is his aspiration admirable? What does the boy not understand about how one becomes a writer? How seriously does he work at acquiring the skills of his craft?
3. In social interactions between boys at the school, much is left unsaid. Why is this? Consider the relationship between the narrator and his roommate Bill White [pp. 11-13, 139-40]. What problems of interpretation arise when so little talking is done? Why is this relationship so problematic?
4. During his visit to Gershon to explain his mistake in whistling the Nazi marching tune, the boy decides not to confide the fact that his father is Jewish. He thinks, “Id let Gershon think the worst of me before I would claim any connection to him, or implicate myself in the fate that had beached him in this room. Why would I want to talk my way into his unlucky tribe?” [p. 23]. What does this episod—including his meeting with the headmaster—tell us about the narrator?
5. Very early on, the narrator tells us that the school adhered informally “to a system of honors that valued nothing you hadnt done for yourself.” He goes on to say “Dean Makepeace had been a friend of Hemingways during World War I and was said to have served as the model for Jakes fishing buddy Bill in The Sun Also Rises” [p. 4]. What seems here like casual exposition is seen later to be foreshadowing, linking the acts of deception committed by the boy and the headmaster. What other examples do you find of Wolffs careful attention to the structure of the novel?
6. Having related his experience of Frosts poem “After Apple-Picking,” the headmaster tells the boys, “Make no mistake . . . a true piece of writing is a dangerous thing. It can change your life” [p. 47]. Why is writing dangerous in this novel, and for whom?
7. Reading The Fountainhead, the narrator says, “I was discovering the force of my will. . . . I understood that nothing stood between me and my greatest desires—nothing between me and greatness itself—but the temptation to doubt my will and bow to counsels of moderation, expedience, and conventional morality, and shrink into the long, slow death of respectability” [p. 68]. Why does Ayn Rands writing have such a powerful effect on him, and why does his initial excitement fade upon actually meeting the author? The boy also learns an important lesson when he rereads the stories of Hemingway, whom Ayn Rand has attacked as a creator of “weak, defeated people” [p. 84]. What does he realize, and how is this lesson important for what happens later [pp. 95-99]?
8. As he looks toward graduation, the narrator says it was a “dream that produced the school, not merely English-envy but the yearning for a chivalric world apart from the din of scandal and cheap dispute, the hustles and schemes of modernity itself. As I recognized this dream I also sensed its futility, but so what? . . . With still a month to graduation I was already damp with nostalgia” [p. 134]. If literature plays a critical role in both the schools chivalric ideal and in the nostalgia the narrator feels, is literature an alternate world in which the narrator would prefer to exist? What is ironic about the above passage?
9. Old School is in large part an examination of the process by which a boy tries to become the person he most desires to be. What does Wolff seem to suggest about the process of self-formation and the fragility of the ego?
10. What is most impressive about the story “Summer Dance” and why does it appeal to the boy so powerfully? Why in typing it does he feel “an intuition of gracious release” [p. 126]? Is this his moment of learning how to “begin to write truly” [p. 126]? Why is it important that he never considers his submission of the story—with slight changes—a deliberate act of plagiarism?
11. The competitors for literary awards are all indebted to other writers: “All of us owed someone, Hemingway or Cummings or Kerouac—or all of them, and more. We wouldnt have admitted to it but the knowledge was surely there, because imitation was the only charge we never brought against the submissions we mocked so cruelly” [p. 14]. Can it sometimes be difficult to draw a line between healthy imitation and plagiarism? Is the schools harsh response to the boys use of another writers story unfair?
12. Speaking of Old School in an interview, Tobias Wolff said, “For this novel to work, the reader has to believe in these boys becoming so madly passionate and competitive about this writing business. That can only happen when there is a complete failure of perspective, which requires a very enclosed world, like an army or a priesthood. Great mistakes can be made because the view becomes so narrow.” How does Wolff create this narrowed perspective? How do his choices of what to describe and what not to describe shape the readers perspective on the novels events? To what degree does the readers perspective merge with the narrators?
13. Tobias Wolff gives his readers an intimate view of his main characters faults. How does your response to the boy change as the novel proceeds? What is the effect, particularly, of the last few chapters?
14. In his review of the novel, Chris Bohjalian noted, “Virtually every chapter in the novel could stand alone as a short story” (The Boston Globe, 4 Jan 2004, C7). Discuss Wolffs attention to the dramatic tension and the formal structure of each chapter, and decide whether you agree with Bohjalians assessment that the novel is informed by Wolffs experience as a master of the short story.
15. The novels epigraph, from a poem by Mark Strand, end with “the truth lies like nothing else and I love the truth.” How does the epigraph relate to the narrators confusion and his conflicts with himself?
16. How does the narrators meeting with Susan Friedman emphasize the difference between their characters and their approaches to the meaning and purposes of writing? Who is the more mature person? Each of them embodies certain ideals. What are they and what is their essential difference?
17. The books final chapter departs from the narrators story and moves to Mr. Ramseys story about Dean Makepeace, who had allowed himself to be thought of as a friend of Hemingway. How does this story work as a coda to the novel? What is the effect of the shift in perspective?
18. In what ways is humor expressed in this novel, and what kind of humor is it? What situations and descriptions are comical?
19. If you have read Tobias Wolffs memoir This Boys Life, how would you compare it to Old School? What is the difference between memoir and fiction, and how does this question relate to the truth/lies dilemma presented by Old School?
PEN/Faulkner Award Finalist
National Book Critics Circle Award Finalist
New York Times Notable Book
Winner of the Northern California Book Award in Fiction
“Ingenious. . . . A tour de force. . . . Achieves a real profundity.” -The Boston Globe
The introduction, discussion questions, suggestions for further reading, and author biography that follow are intended to enhance your groups experience of Tobias Wolffs first full-length novel Old School, which was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award.