Synopses & Reviews
The nature of scientific explanation has been an important topic in philosophy of science for many years. This book highlights some of the conceptual problems that still need to be solved and points out a number of fresh philosophical ideas to explore. Anyone interested in causal and probabilistic explanation, explanation-seeking questions and contrastive explanations, inference to the best explanation, or explanations within the special sciences should find something of interest in this book.
Review
From the reviews: "'Rethinking Explanation' is Volume 152 of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. ... The writing style of all chapters, though 'academic', is clear, intelligible, comparatively jargon-free for philosophy-suave readers ... . The present book ... indicate that inasmuch as all scientific/technological and humanistic knowledge domains retain a rapid expansion into all phases of society there is a great demand for modern approaches 'to explain'." (Karl H. Wolf, International Journal of General Systems, 2008)
Synopsis
This volume is a product of the international research project Theory of Explanation, which was funded by the Joint Committee for Nordic Research Councils for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (NOS-HS). The project started in 2001 and operated for a period of three years by organizing a number of workshops on scientific explanation in Norway, Iceland, Sweden and Finland. The workshops included presentations by people involved in the project and by invited guests. Both groups are represented in this volume, which brings together some of the papers presented in these meetings. The central theme of the research project was scientific explanation, but it was approached from many different angles. This plurality of approaches is also visible in the present volume. The authors share a joint interest in explanation, but not the same theoretical or methodological assumptions. As a whole, this volume shows that, although the theory of explanation has been a major industry within philosophy of science, there are still both conceptual problems to be solved and fresh philosophical ideas to explore. The papers in this volume have been divided into two broad groups. Part 1 consists of papers dealing with general issues in the theory of explanation, while the papers in Part 2 focus on some more specific problems. Part 1: Theory of Explanation
Table of Contents
Contributors, Acknowledgements, Preface Part 1: Theory of Explanation, Bengt Hansson Explanations are about concepts and concept formation, Henrik Hållsten, What to ask of an explanation-theory; Petri Ylikoski, The Idea of Contrastive Explanandum; Jan Faye, The Pragmatic-Rhetorical Theory of Explanation; Olav Gjelsvik, Causal explanation provides knowledge why; Stathis Psillos, Causal Explanation and manipulation; Erik Weber and Jeroen Van Bouwel, Assessing the Explanatory Power of Causal Explanations; Rebecca Schweder, Some Notes on Unificationism and Probabilistic Explanation Part 2: Issues in Explanation Alexander Bird, Selection and Explanation; Johannes Persson, IBE and EBI: on explanation before inference; Jaakko Kuorikoski, Explaining with Equilibria; Annika Wallin, Explanation and environment: the case of psychology; Mika Kiikeri and Tomi Kokkonen, Biological Notions of Innateness and Explanation of Language Acquisition; Robin Stenwall, Aspect kinds Index