Synopses & Reviews
andlt;Pandgt;In Shape, George Stiny argues that seeing shapes -- with all their changeability and ambiguity -- is an inexhaustible source of creative ideas. Understanding shapes, he says, is a useful way to understand what is possible in design.Shapes are devices for visual expression just as symbols are devices for verbal expression. Stiny develops a unified scheme that includes both visual expression with shapes and verbal expression with signs. The relationships -- and equivalencies -- between the two kinds of expressive devices make design comparable to other professional practices that rely more on verbal than visual expression. Design uses shapes while business, engineering, law, mathematics, and philosophy turn mainly to symbols, but the difference, says Stiny, isn't categorical. Designing is a way of thinking. Designing, Stiny argues, is calculating with shapes, calculating without equations and numbers but still according to rules. Stiny shows that the mechanical process of calculation is actually a creative process when you calculate with shapes -- when you can reason with your eyes, when you learn to see instead of count.The book takes the idea of design as calculation from mere heuristic or metaphor to a rigorous relationship in which design and calculation each inform and enhance the other. Stiny first demonstrates how seeing and counting differ when you use rules -- that is, what it means to calculate with your eyes -- then shows how to calculate with shapes, providing formal details. He gives practical applications in design with specific visual examples. The book is extraordinarily visual, with many drawings throughout -- drawings punctuated with words. You have to see this book in order to read it.andlt;/Pandgt;
Review
"Stiny is to 'shape' as Chomsky was to 'word' or Wolfram to 'number.' In my view, though, Stiny may well prove to be the most radical of the three. How different a place his pictorial world is from standard textual or digital worlds: with shape there is no vocabulary, no syntax, no bits, no atoms. As Stiny draws, he talks. Shapes and shape rules bear the force of argument. These drawings are to be looked at keenly, even traced and redrawn by the reader. The supportive text illustrates what can be seen and done, providing both a personal and intellectual history. Through its drawings and maxims, *Shape* challenges much conventional wisdom in philosophy and education, in computer science and artificial intelligence, and in design and the visual arts."--Lionel March, former Rector, Royal College of Art, London, and Emeritus Professor, Design and Computation, University of California, Los Angeles
Review
George Stiny is the paterfamilias of grammars for shapes, embracing all of their inherent ambiguity. This book beautifully explains why shapes are so ambiguous and why their lack of structure is so crucial for design. Stiny shows that grammatical rules for shapes can produce an infinite complexity of designs, just as grammatical rules can produce the expressive richness of prose or poetry. Robert Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance provides an introduction to the damaging effects of structure and analysis in design; for readers wishing to embrace ambiguity, and build on its expressive power, Shape supplies the essential deeper insights. Erik K. Antonsson, Professor of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology
Review
Shape is an important read for anyone interested in the formal process of design. An insightful analysis of the computation, art, cognition, and philosophy of shapes, Stiny's book shows us that even the simplest shape is both ambiguous and perfectly clear. Jonathan Cagan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, coauthor of < i=""> The Design of Things to Come <>
Review
Winner, Reference Category, 2007 AAUP Book Jacket and Journal Show.
Review
andlt;Pandgt;"George Stiny is the paterfamilias of grammars for shapes, embracing all of their inherent ambiguity. This book beautifully explains why shapes are so ambiguous and why their lack of structure is so crucial for design. Stiny shows that grammatical rules for shapes can produce an infinite complexity of designs, just as grammatical rules can produce the expressive richness of prose or poetry. Robert Pirsig's *Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance* provides an introduction to the damaging effects of structure and analysis in design; for readers wishing to embrace ambiguity, and build on its expressive power, *Shape* supplies the essential deeper insights."--Erik K. Antonsson, Professor of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technologyandlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;"*Shape* is an important read for anyone interested in the formal process of design. An insightful analysis of the computation, art, cognition, and philosophy of shapes, Stiny's book shows us that even the simplest shape is both ambiguous and perfectly clear."--Jonathan Cagan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, coauthor of *The Design of Things to Come*andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Synopsis
In
Shape, George Stiny argues that seeing shapes (with all their changeability and ambiguity) is an inexhaustible source of creative ideas. Understanding shapes, he says, is a useful way to understand what is possible in design.
Shapes are devices for visual expression just as symbols are devices for verbal expression. Stiny develops a unified scheme that includes both visual expression with shapes and verbal expression with signs. The relationships, and equivalencies, between the two kinds of expressive devices make design comparable to other professional practices that rely more on verbal than visual expression. Design uses shapes while business, engineering, law, mathematics, and philosophy turn mainly to symbols, but the difference, says Stiny, isn't categorical. Designing is a way of thinking. Designing, Stiny argues, is calculating with shapes, calculating without equations and numbers but still according to rules. Stiny shows that the mechanical process of calculation is actually a creative process when you calculate with shapes: when you can reason with your eyes, when you learn to see instead of count.
The book takes the idea of design as calculation from mere heuristic or metaphor to a rigorous relationship in which design and calculation each inform and enhance the other. Stiny first demonstrates how seeing and counting differ when you use rules (that is, what it means to calculate with your eyes) then shows how to calculate with shapes, providing formal details. He gives practical applications in design with specific visual examples. The book is extraordinarily visual, with many drawings throughout; drawings punctuated with words. You have to see this book in order to read it.
Synopsis
How design is calculating with shapes: formal details and design applications.
Synopsis
In Shape, George Stiny argues that seeing shapes -- with all their changeability and ambiguity -- is an inexhaustible source of creative ideas. Understanding shapes, he says, is a useful way to understand what is possible in design.Shapes are devices for visual expression just as symbols are devices for verbal expression. Stiny develops a unified scheme that includes both visual expression with shapes and verbal expression with signs. The relationships -- and equivalencies -- between the two kinds of expressive devices make design comparable to other professional practices that rely more on verbal than visual expression. Design uses shapes while business, engineering, law, mathematics, and philosophy turn mainly to symbols, but the difference, says Stiny, isn't categorical. Designing is a way of thinking. Designing, Stiny argues, is calculating with shapes, calculating without equations and numbers but still according to rules. Stiny shows that the mechanical process of calculation is actually a creative process when you calculate with shapes -- when you can reason with your eyes, when you learn to see instead of count.The book takes the idea of design as calculation from mere heuristic or metaphor to a rigorous relationship in which design and calculation each inform and enhance the other. Stiny first demonstrates how seeing and counting differ when you use rules -- that is, what it means to calculate with your eyes -- then shows how to calculate with shapes, providing formal details. He gives practical applications in design with specific visual examples. The book is extraordinarily visual, with many drawings throughout -- drawings punctuated with words. You have to see this book in order to read it.
About the Author
Dagmar Kusa is a doctoral candidate in political science at Boston Universityand an associate of the Institute of Ethnic Studies of the SlovakAcademy of Sciences.