Synopses & Reviews
The principal purpose of the book is to conduct a radical criticism of the concept of reading, and especially of the concept of the reader, as these concepts are commonly used in literary criticism. Starting with the point that reading, in the context of literary studies, does not name a single identifiable type of experience (or class of experiences), Bennett argues that the idea of such an experience has been introduced into critical discourse by way of theory: the theory of reading or of reader-response, in other words, takes as its object a supposed experience that it itself begins by constructing. In response to the obvious question of where that theory comes from, if not from a direct encounter with experience, Bennett then sketches in broad terms the historical provenance of the reader, in an argument that includes discussions of Dante, Boccaccio, Cervantes, Marlowe and German idealist philosophy. And in two concluding chapters on modern German novellas, he attempts to show a fundamental disjunction between actual literary practice and the theory of reading. Most major European literary works since the eighteenth century, he suggests, are written in direct opposition to at least one of the central concepts by which criticism has sought to lay hold of them.
Review
"A seamless narrative, in which theory, intellectual history, and explication de texte join hands to advance a relentless flow of thought."
Review
Literary theory has contributed many well-informed readings to literature. The theorist-readers themselves have also been brilliant. But herein lies the rub for Bennett (German, Univ. of Virginia). Their examples do not necessarily mean that others will be either as well informed or as brilliant. Engaging such theorists as Stanley Fish, Georges Poulet, and Wolfgang Iser, et al., the author contests their rigorous models as incompatible with how all readers of literature actually read. Bennett's own readings of the modern novel are well integrated into his questioning of whether there really is such a thing as 'general literary competence' or a right way to read. He identifies the beginning of modern reading in Dante's Commedia, as explained by Susan Noakes (Timely Reading, CH, Mar'89, 26- 3713). Bennett goes further by identifying Dante's models for the reader for thrills and the reader for art, a duality Bennett invented and traces historically.
A study of how literary authors have challenged notions of reading as an extension of experience.
A seamless narrative, in which theory, intellectual history, and explication de texte join hands to advance a relentless flow of thought.-Stanley Corngold
Synopsis
Reading is good for us. The reading of literature, we are told, enlarges our horizons, extends our experience beyond our own lives. But the moral and political dangers that attend the association of reading with experience have long been understood. And is that association even valid? What if precisely our most important literary texts are constructed so as to challenge or disrupt it? This book is a radical criticism of the concept of reading,especially of the concept of thereader, as commonly used in literary criticism. Bennett starts with the point that readingdoes not name a single, identifiable type of experience or class of experiences. Her then sketches in broad terms the historical provenance of thereader, in an argument that includes discussions of Dante, Boccaccio, Cervantes, Marlowe, and German idealist philosophy. In two concluding chapters on modern German novellas, he suggests that most major European literary works since the eighteenth century are written in direct opposition to the central concepts by which criticism has sought to lay hold of them.
About the Author
BENJAMIN BENNETT is Kenan Professor of German at the University of Virginia. His most recent books are
Goethe as Woman: The Undoing of Literature and All Theater Is Revolutionary Theater.