Synopses & Reviews
NGOs set out to save lives, relieve suffering, and service basic human needs. They are committed to serving people across national borders and without regard to race, ethnicity, gender, or religion, and they offer crucial help during earthquakes, tsunamis, wars, and pandemics. But with so many ailing areas in need of assistance, how do these organizations decide where to goand#151;and who gets the aid?
Inand#160;The Good Project, Monika Krause dives into the intricacies of the decision-making process at NGOs and uncovers a basic truth: It may be the case that relief agencies try to help people but, in practical terms, the main focus of their work is to produce projects. Agencies sell projects to key institutional donors, and in the process the project and its beneficiaries become commodities. In an effort to guarantee a successful project, organizations are incentivized to help those who are easy to help, while those who are hardest to help often receive no assistance at all. The poorest of the world are made to compete against each other to become projectsand#151;and in exchange they offer legitimacy to aid agencies and donor governments. Sure to be controversial,and#160;The Good Projectand#160;offers a provocative new perspective on how NGOs succeed and fail on a local and global level.
Review
and#8220;The Good Project is a highly welcome and original contribution to our knowledge of contemporary humanitarianism.and#160; Drawing from sociological institutionalism and Pierre Bourdieu, and positioning herself between studies that fetishize humanitarian ideas and critiques that vilify the compromise of those ideals, Krause uncovers some of the central practices and driving logics of really, existing, humanitarianism.and#160; By studying what humanitarians do, Krause's reveals an unexplored side of what humanitarianism has become.and#8221;
Review
and#8220;This is an urgently important book.and#160; It explains how humanitarian organizations work, do their work, and why that work succeeds or fails. It also offers fresh insights into the rationality of bureaucraciesand#8212;an analysis in depth written in clear, evocative prose.and#8221;
Review
and#8220;Krauseand#8217;s The Good Project is a powerfully original analysis of humanitarian relief organizations like MSF and the ICRC. Observing closely the practical logic through which these NGOs manage their activities, Krause addresses crucial questions: How do NGOs assess what is a and#8216;goodand#8217; project? Why are some beneficiaries more worthy of help than others? How do relief organizations decide where they should work?and#160; How do these organizations position themselves in the field of humanitarian relief as a whole?and#160; Even as Krause shows how NGOs compete in a market for projects, with beneficiaries served as the commodity for which funders pay, she creates a vivid picture of the complex humanityand#8211;and the strategic interactionsand#8211;of both NGO staff and the refugees and victims they serve.and#160; Poignant and funny in places, the book is a great piece of original sociological theorizing.and#8221;
Review
andldquo;The Good Project fills a gap in the humanitarian NGO literature by exploring how these organizations actually do their work. . . . Recommended.andrdquo;
Review
andldquo;Can yet another critique of the aid business contribute anything new? Krause has done so. . . . Krause has written an excellent, wide-ranging, and cogent contribution to the debate on humanitarian practice.andrdquo;
Synopsis
The sufferings of people around the world invite humanitarian intervention, but in practical terms itandrsquo;s not possible to help everyone. and#160;Who gets help, and who does not? and#160;Krause reveals here the constraints and organizational routines in NGOs that determine the answer to this question. and#160;Hers is the first sociological study of NGOs (such as the International Red Cross, Doctors without Borders, Oxfam, CARE, Save the Children). and#160;She discovers that the first priority of NGOs is not to help those in need, as such, but to produce projects. and#160;Managers try for andldquo;good projectsandrdquo; and, since the setting is organizations, they will sometimes appear to propel the career of humanitarian-relief professionals even more than they benefit those who suffer. and#160;Krause sketches in some history of how NGOs have come to play a prominent role in global politics, and she shows how their power operates on a global level: and#160;populations in need come to the attention of andldquo;global civil societyandrdquo; only if theyandrsquo;re perceived by an organization as an opportunity to do a good project. and#160;The market for projects, we learn, produces a form of indirect domination: and#160;the poorest of the world are made to compete against each other as part of potential projects. and#160;And the fact that humanitarian relief exists in an ambiguous zone between states and markets is one reason why it hasnandrsquo;t been the focus of serious social research until now. and#160;This book is a touchstone source for understanding the prominent, ever-growing role of relief NGOs in global politics.
About the Author
Monika Krause
Table of Contents
List of Figures and Tables
AcknowledgmentsIntroduction
1. In Pursuit of the Good Project
2. Beneficiaries as a Commodity
3. The Logframe and the History of the Market for Projects
4. The History of Humanitarian Authority and the Divisions of the Humanitarian Field
5. The Reform of Humanitarianism
6. What about Human Rights?
Conclusion
Appendix on Methods
Bibliography
Index