Synopses & Reviews
The books traditionally associated with John the Apostle constitute a major portion of the Christian New Testament. The influence of these books, particularly the Gospel according to John and the book of Revelation, has been immense both in Christianity and in Western culture. This study provides a fresh examination of how these books were accepted--or not accepted--in the early Church, and in so doing demonstrates why long-held theories about them must be discarded and replaced.
Review
"Hill's ambitious project is remarkably successful. It is to be applauded as a timely correction of current scholarship. The bold outline of his thesis is entirely compelling."--Westminster Theological Journal
"Seldom does one encounter a book that both challenges so trenchantly perspectives advocated by so many and makes the case so persuasively."--The Catholic Biblical Quarterly
About the Author
Charles E. Hill is Professor of New Testament at the Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, Florida.
Table of Contents
Part I: The Orthodox Johannophobia Theory 1. The Making of a Consensus
2. The State of the Question
3. Consequences of the Question
4. The Three Empirical Bases for the Consensus
5. The Orientation of the Following Study
6. An Observation about Method: The Quotation Standard
Part II: The Johannine Writings in the Second Century
7. John among the Orthodox c.170-200
8. John and 'The Gnostics'
9. John among the Orthodox, before 170
Part III: The Evidence for a Johannine Corpus
10. Evidence from Common Use
11. Evidence from Intertextual Use
12. The Manuscript Evidence
13. The Johannine Writings, in Corpus and Canon
Part IV: Brief Concluding Essay
14. The Myth of Orthodox Johannophobia
15. The Consciousness of a Johannine Corpus
16. Johannine Origins and History