by Glen David Gold
(Used - Trade Paper)
|
 |
I lived in Oakland, California in 1993. For
those of you who haven't been, it's a town with all of the
advantages of geography (a port, rolling hills, miles of bayfront
property) and none of the luck of your average city, resulting
in a place that just never succeeded, regardless of the fortunes
made by its more beloved neighbor across the bay.
I was a failed fiction writer. I was a bad fiction reader,
too, in that I argued with authors in my head. I would crack
open a book let's say the book was by Phillip Roth,
and let's say the first line was "Hi, my name is Inga.
I'm a 17-year-old Swedish nun." That would be all it
took for me to toss the book aside, muttering, "No,
you're Phillip Roth."
I wrote non-fiction for the local paper. One day, I was
called for jury duty. An open and shut case; should have
taken about a day to try. A kid had beaten and robbed his
landlord, a frail old man who limped into court on a cane.
He pointed out the kid who'd done it. They'd known each
other for years. There was no cross-examination. The kid
didn't take the stand in his own defense.
Then we took lunch. I sat at McDonald's, drinking coffee,
and in walked the old man. "Walked," as in without
a cane.
After lunch, I found the bailiff, the bailiff found the
judge, and I sat in a secret session judge, lawyers,
defendant and explained what I'd seen. The judge
asked if that made me doubt the veracity of the old man,
and I told him it made me think he'd been coached to use
a cane in the courtroom. Okay, they said, don't tell the
other jurors, but you can go.
So I went. And we waited and waited and court was dismissed
for the day. It was obvious that I'd thrown a wrench into
the proceedings.
The next morning, we were still waiting. We were told we
could go to lunch. I didn't want to go back to McDonald's,
so I went to the library. The top floor of the Oakland library
on 13th Street is the History Room, which I'd
heard about but had never been in. The idea of an Oakland
History Room was sort of charming to me. It felt like going
to the museum of tungsten or the world's third largest ball
of string.
I asked to see materials on Lake Merritt, the center of
Oakland, because my apartment was near it, and I wondered
if there were old photographs that would show it off. There
weren't. Instead, there was a stack of aerial photographs
of the lake with bridges running across it.
There were no bridges across Lake Merritt. There
never had been. If you've ever seen Lake Merritt, you know
there's neither room nor reason for bridges. But nonetheless,
it turns out that Joseph Strauss, the tyrannical engineer
who ran the Golden Gate Bridge project in the 1930s, had
sketched out a bridge for Lake Merritt. He was fanatically
jealous of the Bay Bridge, and wanted to put something in
the East Bay something, anything, didn't matter what
it was, if the city needed it, or if anyone had asked for
it and he settled on Lake Merritt. Once he got enough
publicity for the Golden Gate, he forgot about the bridge
for Oakland. Which makes it a perfect Oakland story.
What I found in that stack of photographs was my first
taste of history-as-narrative. And better yet, the history
that might have been there was an extremely realistic
photograph of an opera house on Lake Merritt, and another
with huge fountains, and a third with the very library I
was in, but its rear porch extended into a dock, so that
people could sail up, tie off their boats, and go check
out books. All so real, and yet all such unrealized fantasies.
When I returned to court, the old man went back on the
stand. The district attorney asked him where he'd had lunch,
if he'd used his cane, if not, then why not. Oh, he had
medication and didn't need the cane sometimes? Why had he
used the cane in court? Because the medication made him
foggy? Ah, yes, well, then, let's continue.
It was an interesting lesson in packaging the truth. I
still believed he'd been coached, but I also believed that
in his desire for sympathy, he'd sort of overshot the mark.
There were more witnesses, they all identified the kid who'd
beat him up, and we convicted him after deliberating about
three hours.
There was a lesson there that I absorbed, but I was entirely
unconscious of it as I started writing my first good piece
of journalism. Based on what I'd found at the history room,
I recounted the alternate history of Lake Merritt. It opened
with an incredible, lost-to-the-mist story I'd found in the
1893 Oakland Enquirer, about a city council debate about usage
of the lake that had gotten so heated that the former mayor,
in the middle of a speech vilifying his opponents, dropped
dead on the floor of city hall. Then, with the body still
warm, his opponents passed the very measure he'd been bloviating
against, and then they adjourned for the night.
The story was so bizarre and colorful I didn't want to
exaggerate it. I stuck close to the exact language of the
articles that reported it, filling in only enough detail
to give the reader the impression he was there. It was a
new kind of discipline to me. And when I was done, I had
a lengthy article chock full of those amazing nuggets
rival sea captains ramming each other's boats; the awful
plan to dump the city's sewage into the lake, reasoning
the tide would pull it to sea (it worked just as well as
you'd imagine); the bandits of the 1890s who, troll-like,
wouldn't let people cross the mouth of the lake without
paying extortion money.
When I was done, I was congratulated on my research, and
was told how wonderful history was. And I realized something:
I could have lied. No one would have checked out the microfiche.
If I'd made stuff up, it would have been all-but-untraceable.
It dawned on me that, unlike fiction, no one argues with
non-fiction (okay, if you're Noam Chomsky or Derrida, sure,
but you know what I mean). If someone writes, "during
the Battle of Gettysburg, in 1863, General Lee sent fifty
muskets to his flank," you nod, yes, and you wait for
the next bit of story to happen. You don't go about the
same suspension of disbelief as with fiction though
you really should muskets? Gettysburg? Lee? Is any
of that sentence actually defensible?
So I started to play with the idea of adapting a non-fiction
voice. Carter begins with names, dates, places, newspaper
accounts, of one of the true mysteries of the 1920s
the death of President Harding, who was basically fine one
day and gone the next, and who was never autopsied. I want
to say that, metaphorically, at least, I never brought my
cane to court in other words, I tried to leave the
props at home and let the reader judge whether my story felt
true or not.
Luckily, Oakland has the most odd and pathetic and wonderful
history you could imagine. There were so many gifts waiting
for me I could hardly wait to get to the library each day.
I want to tell you about all of them, but here, just one:
I used to pass every day a photograph of the Oakland fire
department, circa 1892, and there they were, six or seven
men, all of them about 5 foot 4 inches tall, except one
man, Joe Sullivan, who just happened to be, at 8 foot 2
inches, the tallest man in the world. He looked miserable.
I looked up his obituary, and it turned out he'd joined
the fire department because he couldn't stand people watching
him. He figured he'd choose a job where people would pay
attention to things other than himself. Alas, he was wrong,
and fires he attended were often more chaotic than otherwise,
because crowds would stand between him and the pumps, gawking
not at the flames, but at his own tall self.
When you are handed a character like that, it is wise to
not embellish. But explore, yes, it's very wise to take the
facts Sullivan presents the emotional truth behind
his life and to explore them. So Sullivan appears early
and briefly in Carter, both intimidating and shy
angry and embarrassed.
I wrote quite a bit before I wrote Carter, and it
was a process of slowly killing off the clever in me, learning
how to listen to characters and scenes. Finding the History
Room lent my stories weight.
There are times when I walk around Lake Merritt now, seeing
the alternative history the opera house, the bridges,
the fountains intermixed with my own a magician
and a blind woman flirting in an overgrown park while a
lion eats roast beef off of wax paper. They are both equally
rooted in what's actually there, right before your very
eyes, ready to vanish or be transported across a wide and
commodious stage, with just a blink or the turn of a page. |