Buy 2, Get 1 Free Used Book Sale. Enter code BUYUSED at checkout
Used, New, and Out of Print Books - We Buy and Sell - Powell's Books
Cart |
|  my account  |  wish list  |  help   |  800-878-7323
Hello, | Login
MENU
  • Browse
    • New Arrivals
    • Bestsellers
    • Award Winners
    • Signed Preorders
    • Signed Editions
    • Digital Audio Books
    • Daily Dose
    • Newsletters
    • See All Subjects
  • Used
  • Staff Picks
    • Staff Picks
    • Picks of the Month
    • Staff Top Fives 2017
    • Boox
    • Indiespensable
    • 25 Memoirs to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Global Books to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Women to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Books to Read Before You Die
  • Gifts + Gift Cards
    • Gift Cards & eGift Cards
    • Powell's Souvenirs
    • Read Rise Resist Gear
    • Journals & Notebooks
    • Games
    • Socks
  • Sell Books
    • Sell Books Online
    • Sell Books in Our Stores
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Find A Store

PowellsBooks.Blog
Authors, readers, critics, media − and booksellers.

Contributors

A Different Kind of Lie

by Charles Seife, September 16, 2010 3:20 PM
There's got to be something about the Lincoln Memorial that turns everybody into liars. Last month, a day after standing just a few steps down from the grim visage of Honest Abe, Glenn Beck told a whopper: he insisted that there were half a million people at his rally on the Washington Mall. This was wrong by about a factor of five; the most reliable estimate is that there were fewer than 100,000. But the crown for exaggerating crowds has to go to someone on the opposite side of the political spectrum. In 1995, Louis Farrakhan conjured up an estimated 600,000 fictional mall walkers to make his Million Man March live up to its name. When Farrakhan threatened to sue the Park Service, that organization gave up on the crowd-estimation game for more than a decade.

Beck and Farrakhan aren't the only ones peddling bogus numbers. Far from it. Once you start looking for numerical nonsense, you can find it everywhere. In British Petroleum's estimates of how much oil was leaking from the Deepwater Horizon well. In the reports that our schools are steadily improving. In hundreds of dubious polls — including (allegedly) completely phony ones — that pock newspapers and websites. Fake numbers are everywhere because they're a particularly powerful form of propaganda.

People are disarmed by mathematical lies because numbers seem to have an aura of truth about them. We tend not to question their veracity. But numbers can be — and are — made to lie. Those who have figured this out are beginning to alter the way we perceive reality.

Even the simple act of counting is affected. Political meddling has ensured that we can't even tally votes properly; even worse, naked partisanship is destroying our ability to make an accurate count of our citizens. And these battles aren't just in the U.S.; politicos in the U.K. and Canada are busy trying to manipulate their censuses. In a democracy, he who controls the counting controls the populace.

It's easy to laugh at nonsense statistics and bogus formulas — such as the one that implies that female sprinters will break the sound barrier or the one that gives a recipe for the perfect butt. As silly as these examples are, the media gobble them up — and they illustrate how credulous we are when confronted with numbers that lie. And, though nobody was harmed by a Beck or a Farrakhan exaggerating the size of a crowd, our inability to spot dishonest numbers is a serious threat. It can even be a matter of life or death.




Books mentioned in this post

Proofiness

Charles Seife

Zero The Biography of a Dangerous Idea

Charles Seife
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##

Most Read

  1. 25 Books to Read Before You Die: World Edition by Powell's Staff
  2. 25 Memoirs to Read Before You Die by Powell's Staff
  3. Powell's Interview: Tracy K. Smith, Author of 'Wade in the Water' by Jill Owens
  4. Learning to Travel in Morocco by Christine Mangan
  5. Required Reading: 40 Books Set in the Pacific Northwest by Powell's Staff

Blog Categories

  • Interviews
  • Original Essays
  • Lists
  • Q&As
  • Playlists
  • Portrait of a Bookseller
  • Required Reading
  • On the Table
  • Beyond the Headlines
  • Readerly Terms

6 Responses to "A Different Kind of Lie"

Margie December 30, 2010 at 08:17 PM
I was extremely disappointed when, in Chapter 7, Mr. Seife used "proofiness" to overestimate the number of persons wrongfully convicted of committing crimes. In recalculating Mr. Marquis' wrongful conviction figures, he (fairly) reduced the number of people in prison for murder, rape and sexual assualt to 80,000, but he used an arbitrary number of 4,000 exonerations when the ACTUAL number was 340 (at least according to the cites he used - the Innocence Project website puts the number closer to 240). Thus, instead of a 5% error rate, the number of persons wrongfully convicted of murder, rape and sexual assault is actually less than .4%. I couldn't figure out where he got 5% until I did the math backward and then realized that he was using the 4,000 figure that did not have any basis in fact. It frankly makes me wonder about the calculations in the rest of the book.

Chris October 20, 2010 at 01:46 AM
@fahrender, its called a grabber! With the limited attention span of the sheeple masses, sometimes it takes a controvrsial statement like this get people to pay attention.

Chris October 20, 2010 at 01:43 AM
Im not going to mudsling as others have. If its your perogitive it is easy to poke holes in just about anything, especially when dealing with statistics. Disinformation, confrontaton and condemnation abound when the truth is near! You must be on to something here!

fahrender September 22, 2010 at 09:11 PM
Mr. Seife, Does your first statement include yourself? Or would you say that it's just hyperbole? At any rate, not a good way to begin a column about a book that purports to examine statistics as a source of confabulation! Especially since you wrote not only the column but also the book.

Jane September 21, 2010 at 10:37 AM
I agree with Daniel's comment and want to add in the factor of wishful thinking, or ego defense. Mr. Beck's incompetence in estimating crowds will not cause him to be randomly wrong, but is likely to cause him to overestimate. And Mr. Farrakhan's threatening to sue merely demonstrates that proving that one's estimate is reasonably accurate (or in the ball park) is scientifically or legally difficult. So if crowd estimation is difficult, it is predictable that estimators will err in ways that support their egos. And that is without any actual criminal behavior. The real question is: How can we count (people, votes) better? Once we know that, there will still be people who will try to subvert the system, i.e., cause a miscount to support their own purposes. But we need accurate counting first, and then we can work on preventing criminal activity.

Daniel September 17, 2010 at 08:00 PM
Unless one can establish that Mr Beck is good at estimating the size of crowds, there is no way to distinguish dishonesty from incompetence here. Likewise, unless one can establish that Mr Seife really understands that distinction, there is no way to distinguish whether claiming that Mr Beck's claim was a lie was itself dishonest, or merely incompetent.

Result(s) 6

Post a comment:

*Required Fields
Name*
Email*
  1. Please note:
  2. All comments require moderation by Powells.com staff.
  3. Comments submitted on weekends might take until Monday to appear.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Instagram

  • Help
  • Guarantee
  • My Account
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Security
  • Wish List
  • Partners
  • Contact Us
  • Shipping
  • Newsletters
  • Sitemap
  • © 2018 POWELLS.COM Terms
  • 800-878-7323