The Egyptologist
by Arthur Phillips
A review by Laura Miller
Ancient Egypt and detective stories inspire a similar feverish obsession, and
Arthur Phillips, in his new novel The Egyptologist, has a pretty good idea
why. The novel, disguised as a collection of letters and journal entries, traces
two stories, each woven from a mix of fact and fabrication, by two very different
men.
The first, Ralph Trilipush, describes his determined search, in late 1922,
for the tomb of an Egyptian king who supposedly reigned at the very end of the
Middle Kingdom (around 1650 B.C.), a surreptitious quest pursued not far from
the Valley of the Kings, where Howard Carter is making his famous excavation
of the tomb of Tutankhamun. The second story is written 32 years later by Harold
Ferrell, a retired private detective, who believes that Trilipush is possibly
a fraud and probably the murderer of two men. (Interspersed with Trilipush's
journal and Ferrell's account are letters from a Boston woman, Trilipush's fiancée,
who Ferrell also once loved.)
Phillips' first novel, Prague,
was a quicksilver concoction tracing the inner lives of a handful of young Americans
in the newly opened Eastern Europe of the early 1990s. Their painfully funny
efforts to seize an authentic sense of self from the grab bag of secondhand
images, styles and ideologies of the late 20th century made it one of those
books you either love or hate, depending on how culture-saturated you are and
how exquisitely developed your sense of irony is. The Egyptologist isn't
as fresh or as witty, but it may be more accessible to the kind of reader who
found the characters in Prague unbearably affected. It's an adventure
in unreliable narration, and replete with old-fashioned charms.
Trilipush and Ferrell, who have more in common than either suspects, nonetheless
represent two entirely different ways of spinning a story from a handful of
fragmented facts. Trilipush is the romantic, having seized upon a papyrus of
contested origin as the work of Atum-hadu, a king whose existence most other
Egyptologists doubt. That the text consists of some pretty racy poems referring
to "the rigid scepter of his power" and "her Nile delta,"
among other indelicacies, doesn't help his reputation much. One critic has called
him "a wishful thinker, a dreamer of unspeakable dreams, a distraction
to scholars, and a corrupter of amateurs." Bent on proving himself, he
has set off to find Atum-hadu's tomb, funded by his fiancée's wealthy
father. According to Trilipush, the facts must be approached boldly, with creativity:
"When it comes to incomplete history, one needs to encircle the truth,
not bound at it like an amorous kangaroo." (That comparison being a dig
at the Australian Ferrell.)
Where Trilipush is eager to jump to the most grandiose conclusions (he's drafted
the acknowledgements, epigraph and author bio for his account of the expedition
even before he gets to the site), Ferrell is a cynic. He's forever explaining
that human beings and their motivations can be boiled down to a small number
of sordid categories, all of which he's encountered during his decades in the
gumshoe trade, you can bet. "When you understand them, people can't surprise
you, you see," he writes with a world-weary authority.
Both men are utterly wrong, Trilipush because he has too much imagination and
Ferrell because he has too little. The veritable cathedrals of vanity that Trilipush
constructs in his journals (alternately fantasizing about hanging out with Carter
at Cairo's Explorer's Club and belittling him as "the passing generation,
reluctantly yielding us the torch") are funny, but Ferrell is the shrewder
creation. His is the hard-bitten, down-to-earth, private dick's voice we associate
with the unvarnished truth, but his simple formula for what drives people --
"money, hunger, lust, power, survival. That's all there is" -- doesn't
account for Trilipush's behavior at all.
To the reader goes the diverting task of sifting through the lies, delusions,
evasions and misperceptions of these two men to arrive at some notion of what
really happened. That makes The Egyptologist a kind of puzzle, but most
astute thriller and mystery buffs will have figured out the plot's secrets and
twists early on. The real game lies in the slow revelation of why neither man
can allow himself to understand the truth and how what we need to believe about
the world often becomes more important to us than our own lives.
|
|