Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom
by Sean B Carroll
A review by Doug Brown
Developmental biology is the study of how living things unfold from a single fertilized
cell to a fully functioning organism. Back in the mid-Pleistocene, when I was
a zoology undergrad, developmental biology consisted of embryology and... well,
that was pretty much it. In the intervening millennia, science has made major
advances in genetics and gene expression, leading to the expansion of a new field:
evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo Devo for short. Paleontology, genetics,
embryology, molecular biology, and comparative anatomy all rub shoulders in Evo
Devo. Finally evolution can be told not in just-so stories, but in step-by-step
genetic transcriptions and protein translations. Rather than speculating on how
insects developed flight, we can see exactly which genes are involved in making
wings, and look at what those same genes do in flightless insects.
Genes are often first identified when something goes wrong; when a mutation
causes a developing organism to be malformed. Thus, many genes are named not
for their normal function, but what happens when they mutate. The eyeless
gene is actually the gene that initiates eye formation in most animals, but
it was named when it was found that mutations resulted in - you guessed it -
eyeless fruit flies. Many strangely named genetic characters populate Endless
Forms Most Beautiful, including tinman which is involved in making
hearts (get it? -- think Dorothy and Toto) and Sonic hedgehog, which is
involved in limb production of many animals, including us.
One of the big revelations from Evo Devo is genomes contain toolboxes that
are largely conserved throughout evolution. A small group of genes control much
of an animal's embryological development, and these genes are similar from fruit
flies to humans. The genes that control development of our limbs are the same
family of genes that control insect limb development. These toolbox genes are
also usually arranged on chromosomes in the order of the body regions they control.
They are called homeobox genes, or Hox genes for short.
New and modified structures often come not from new genes, but from new uses
of old genetic tools. The genes that make insect wings started out making gill
branches in aquatic arthropods. To understand how this could work, first a bit
of anatomy. Animal bodies develop in segments. In many invertebrates these segments
are easy to see, even externally. Each pair of a millipede's legs comes from
a segment, as a famous example. All animals develop this way, even us. Genes
can perform different tasks depending on which type of segment they are in;
a head segment, a body segment, a limb segment, etc. The difference between
limbs from species to species is as much due to different switches as different
genes. Switches are another area of great advancement; back when I took genetics
they knew about repressor proteins and activator proteins, but just a few examples
were known. Now it appears that activation and repressor switches play a large
role in development, and a single gene can trigger cascades of switches. The
homeobox genes largely consist of sequences which encode proteins that
bind to other parts of the genome, causing those other genes to either be expressed
or not be expressed.
Switches also disproved an idea of Alan Turing's, one of the rare occasions
he was wrong about something. In the early 1950s Turing wrote a fascinating
paper suggesting animal stripes could be obtained via different chemicals diffusing
through a developing embryo. Every book on chaos mentions it as an example of
how a simple method can yield complex patterns. But it turns out that switches
are how nature usually makes stripes. You start with a gene that puts a dark
pigment across the organism, and then switch that gene off in alternate segments
of the body. Voila, stripes. This theme of starting with plenty and then genetically
switching things off is a common theme in Evo Devo. Paleontologist Samuel Williston
framed this as a law, stating, "it is [also] a law in evolution that parts
in an organism tend toward reduction in number, with the fewer parts greatly
specialized in function." Carroll shows how in specialized organisms the
genes for making many parts (teeth, limbs, etc.) are often still there in specialized
animals, but they are just switched off during development.
I feel bad that I'm not doing this book (or subject) justice. It really is
interesting stuff, and this is coming from someone who found embryology dull
dull dull. It takes more than a few paragraphs to explain it well, though, and
Carroll is a much better explainer than I. The title comes from Darwin's Origin
of Species: "...from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful
and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved." Want to learn about
butterfly wings and their patterns? It's in here. Ever wondered why we don't
look more like chimpanzees if we share over 98% of our DNA? That's in here too.
Want to know how spider spinnerets, spider book lungs, and insect wings all
evolved from genes that originally made gill branches? Yup, that's here. Want
to see a wicked picture of a monster Cyclops lamb? Check. I know a book on developmental
biology isn't the sort of thing that usually leaps off the shelf into people's
hands, but if you are at all interested in how our genetic toolboxes work, Endless
Forms Most Beautiful is well worth a reading or two.
|
|