Thirteen Steps Down
by Ruth Rendell
The Banality of Evil
A review by Laura MIller
Ruth Rendell knows how to sink her hooks in. A third of the way through her new
book, Thirteen Steps Down, the mood is resolutely bleak. This is like a
Martin Amis novel without the distracting verbal pyrotechnics, a full-bore, unflinching
contemplation of human pettiness, stupidity and self-delusion, written in elegant,
unshowy prose. Abandoning the book, however, is not an option. Watching the ingenious
clockwork of Rendell's plot tick its way to the story's inevitable -- yet somehow
unpredictable -- conclusion turns out to be addictive.
Rendell is widely considered the best living mystery writer, and her publisher
has been strenuously promoting Thirteen Steps Down as a potential crossover
hit in the U.S. (In her native Britain, she's already quite famous.) To someone
like me, a reader with only a passing interest in the genre, the introduction
of a real-life serial killer in the first few pages was at first discouraging:
Serial killers have become such a cheap and easy device for TV series and airport
paperbacks. (If the killers themselves no longer give you the creeps, try thinking
about all those respectable-looking business travelers gorging themselves on
elaborate descriptions of fantastically sadistic murders.)
Fortunately, John Reginald Christie, a necrophiliac who murdered several women
in London during the '40s and '50s, has been dead for half a century by the
time the action commences in Thirteen Steps Down. Mix Cellini, a home
exercise equipment repairman, collects books on the killer and even goes so
far as to rent rooms in a big, ramshackle house on the same Notting Hill street
where Christie committed his crimes. Mix, still good-looking enough to render
extra services to his rich housewife clients, is gradually going to pot on a
diet of junk food and booze. The gossip tabloids he reads have a similar effect
on his mind. He obsesses over and eventually begins stalking a fashion model
named Nerissa Nash.
Superficially, Mix has nothing in common with his elderly landlady, Gwendolyn
Chawcer, a reclusive bookworm so behind the times she can't imagine what microwaves
are meant to do. But the two of them do share a habit of daydreaming and a certain
mulish, blinkered self-absorption -- a trait that will be the undoing of them
both. Gwendolyn's solipsism balances Mix's; this is Rendell's cautionary wag
of the finger at anyone who thinks that immersion in great literature automatically
makes for a great mind. Gwendolyn may have read all of Proust and Henry James
more than once, but their riches furnish a cramped and windowless soul.
The point of view hops from one character to another, but the overall effect
is of a cool, ironic omniscience, as if the novel were being narrated by a minor
god. From this enjoyable perspective, we watch as foolishness and fate conspire
to overthrow the plans of men. Not that any of those plans could be characterized
as "best-laid"; in Mix's case, even his delusions have delusions.
Convinced that Nerissa will go out with him if he only gets the opportunity
to ask her, he frets briefly about the expense of taking her "somewhere
fabulous." No worries, though: "once he'd been seen out with her --
or, say, three times -- he'd be made, the TV offers would start rolling in,
the requests for interviews, the invitations to premieres." (Actually,
Mix's admiration of Christie is the only false note in Rendell's mordant characterization;
he's just too conventional for the creepy outsider world of serial killer fandom.)
Gwendolyn, for her part, harbors an ancient crush on the doctor who treated
her dying mother back in '50s, the only young man she ever spent time alone
with. He once said he was "awfully fond" of her, and from this impassioned
confession and a hazy notion of romance derived from Victorian novels, she has
concocted a great and thwarted love, "the most important event in her life."
The chance discovery of a newspaper obituary for his wife prompts her to write
to him.
In Rendell's view, we seldom understand how life works and how little control
we have over it; criminals are the biggest dolts of all for risking so much
on schemes that are bound to go awry. What's more, murderers also lack sympathetic
imagination (as opposed to the narcissistic imagination of fantasy). The characters
who fare best in Thirteen Steps Down pay real attention to other people,
instead of treating them like props. It's this unglamorized view of crime --
very different from pop culture's own dreams of evil homicidal manipulators
-- that makes Rendell's fiction irresistible.
|
|