|
The Good Life: A Novel
by Jay McInerney
Guilt, Desire and Ambition: Jay McInerney's Spoilt New York Lives
A review by Sylvia Brownrigg
Ambivalence typically grips Jay McInerney's characters: they have desires that
shame them, or spouses who embarrass them, or tastes they can't afford. They know
they should know better than to make the mistakes they make (having affairs, taking
drugs, trying to take over a company). They can't believe they are settled down
in apparently stable and happy marriages; or they can't believe that they aren't.
McInerney's first, era-defining novel, the fine and very funny Bright
Lights, Big City (1984), begins with two sentences that tautly contain this
conflict: "You are not the kind of guy who would be at a place like this
at this time of the morning. But here you are...".
In a twenty-something character, such paradoxes are endearing, you might say
constitutive of the age. They fold neatly into stories of drinking and drug-taking,
as the protagonist continues to trust that round the next corner -- after one
more drink, one more line -- all will become clear, and chronic ambivalence
will be put to rest in the form of the ideal woman finally met, or the great
adventure gloriously launched, or the exhausted coma at last lapsed into.
Such rhythms formed the backbone of the comedy in Bright Lights, Big City,
whose unnamed second-person narrator continually appealed to his own better
or worse self (he found it hard to tell the difference) as he made his frantic,
coke-fuelled journey through New York, alternately travelling in limousines
in the company of drug lords and socialites, or hopping turnstiles in the subway,
broke and alone. Although the novel drew comparisons with Salinger and Fitzgerald,
McInerney's light touch and tight language has perhaps more in common with the
work of P. G. Wodehouse, as he deftly details a winning, hapless young man getting
into scrapes with girls, bosses and late, late nights.
(Bertie Wooster may have had a weakness for "the sauce", but if "blow"
had been available to him it seems possible he too would have come to call it
Bolivian Marching Powder and enjoyed extended metaphors about the armies of
South America.) Even the name of the narrator's well-connected best friend,
the devil in his ear, Tad Allagash, has a Wodehouseian beat to it.
As McInerney and his characters have grown up, the attitude towards intoxication
has necessarily changed. There was just too much fun being had in Bright
Lights, Big City for the word "addiction" to make an appearance,
but by the time of Brightness
Falls (1992) the author was, as the times demanded, taking the issue seriously,
and in that novel he sacrificed a couple of his characters on opposing altars:
Corrine Calloway, one of the protagonists, on that of sobriety (she gives up
drinking and thereafter enjoys herself half as much); and Corrine and her husband
Russell's close friend Jeff Pierce, famous bad-boy author, on that of the heroin
addiction that indirectly kills him.
Taking drugs wasn't as funny any more, and if Russell and his friends still
had entertaining mishaps when drunk, McInerney also made a point of framing
the novel's narrative with an account of Jeff's internment at a drying-out clinic
in rural Connecticut, drawn in grimly vivid detail, with flourishes of dark
humour -- "detox admissions had doubled and trebled in recent years; depression
was showing steady growth, but substance abuse was booming".
McInerney has continued to mine the territories of drug use and abuse (in subsequent
works including The
Last of the Savages, 1996, and Model
Behavior, 1998), and his new novel, The Good Life, contains a visit
to that same bucolic rehab facility -- made this time not by friends of the
recovering addict, but by parents. Luke McGavock, a wealthy banker who recently
got out of the game in order to spend more time with his family, has a tense
session with his wife Sasha (a beautiful fashion maven who spends most of her
time being photographed at charity galas in New York) and a counsellor who probes
the couple on their own habits. The scene, in which the parents squabble over
the fact that their daughter, Ashley, has played each of them for a prescription
for Ritalin, and may have delved into her mother's stashes of Paxil, Dexedrine
and Ephedra -- has a brittle comedy, as well as a touch of the melancholy that
accompanies McInerney's exposure of these well-meaning types who have so obviously
failed. You are not the kind of guy whose fourteen-year-old daughter would take
an overdose of Vicodin -- but here you are.
In the McGavock marriage, we are meant to take Luke's side. He may have spent
thirteen competitive years working long days and earning the vast sums of money
that fund his wife and daughter's excesses -- but his heart is in the right
place.
Both Sasha and Luke are Southerners (or were once), and this allows McInerney
to draw one of his distinctive portraits of outsiders who buy into the promise
of Manhattan glamour. Even as he repudiates Sasha's values and priorities, Luke
sees himself in relation to her transformation:
The same thing happened, he supposed, to all of the eager boys and girls
drawn to the brilliant glow of the city from Charlotte, Charlottesville, Pittsburgh,
Pittsfield.... They gained their citizenship at the expense of their amazement....
When was the last time that any of them had even looked at those towers at
the tip of the island, really? The same thing had happened to Luke, though
he retained some of his capacity to be amazed -- if only at the rapidity with
which Sasha had become the epitome of a certain rarefied type of urban sophisticate.
If it was the virtual collapse of Wall Street in 1987 that gave dramatic shape
to McInerney's study of money and ambition in Brightness Falls, it is
the literal, dramatic destruction of the World Trade Center in 2001 that shapes
the narrative of The Good Life.
McInerney tracks his two couples -- the McGavocks and Russell and Corrine Calloway,
now in their forties and the parents of two small children -- in the "Indian
Summer" before the attacks of September 11, and then in the aftermath,
when, separately, both Luke and Corrine are drawn to join a team making sandwiches
and coffee for rescue workers and National Guardsmen.
(Luke has lost a good friend in the conflagration, as have the Calloways.)
In the eerie, smoke-filled midnights under a makeshift tent, these two, unknown
to each other before, come to seek the consolation provided by helping others,
and incidentally find a deeper consolation with one another -- each of them
unhappy at home and seeking refuge from the inadequacies of their marriages.
In other words, the disaster brings two troubled souls together for a passionate
adulterous liaison in the shadow of the city's great and fearsome loss.
Corrine's unhappiness is slightly more complex than Luke's, perhaps because
we know more about Russell, who is not as simple a target as Sasha. Russell
may have parallel failings -- he is seduced not so much by wealth as by celebrity,
another frequently visited compulsion in McInerney's work, enjoying his association
with cultural icons both real (Salman Rushdie) and imagined (the famed independent
filmmaker Cody Erhardt). But he is an affectionate, involved father to the Calloway
twins, Storey and Jeremy, as well as a dedicated friend and host. The novel
opens, in a scene similar to one at the beginning of Brightness Falls,
with a large, boisterous, of-its-time dinner party, where Russell shows off
for a famous chef friend, waxing eloquent about the wine.
(McInerney pours his own oenophilia into both male characters in the novel;
we know not to trust Sasha because she is an avid drinker of the despised Chardonnay.)
Also, while Sasha has remained at a relatively safe remove from the terrorist
attacks, in the McGavocks' Upper East Side home, Russell witnessed some of the
destruction first-hand, from the Calloways' Tribeca loft, and was shaken by
the sight of "the, as he put it, 'not-quite-tiny-enough' figures jumping
out of the tower eight blocks away, close enough to distinguish between men
and women.... Russell said he stopped counting after twenty-seven".
We know from McInerney's earlier portrait of Corrine that she has Florence
Nightingale impulses; in many ways her thankless role in the previous novel
was to be Russell's conscience, as his ambition and greed threatened to overwhelm
him. Now, however, as McInerney sketches it, there is something selfish in Corrine's
succumbing to the lure of Ground Zero:
Her initial desire to flee the city, clutching her babies, had partially
subsided as she'd felt herself drawn beyond the barricades by an impulse no
less compulsive than the old restlessness. She felt strangely at home at Bowling
Green, near the epicenter of the trauma that had ruined their sleep and clouded
their dreams.
That Corrine's relation to motherhood is vexed by a high-tech, genetic complication
-- she carried the twins herself, but they were the product of a donor-egg fertilization
made possible by her own wayward sister -- may bear on her conflicted feelings
towards the home she and Russell have made together, but McInerney never quite
makes this clear, though he includes a long excursion on the strangeness of
the obstetric procedures and the precariousness of the twins' premature births.
Against the background of rescue workers and charred bodies, the novel essentially
traces the arc of the affair between Luke and Corrine. As lovers do, they enjoy
the sort of probing conversations they can no longer have at home (on subjects
including international capitalism, the mysteries of male sexuality, family
history and eating disorders) and contrive trysts in pleasing locations. The
moral edge of the situation is blunted by the fact that both Sasha and Russell
have confessed to previous sordid infidelities, thus liberating Corrine and
Luke from much of their guilt. Besides, the premiss of Luke and Corrine's union
is that they are good people trapped in lives that don't quite fit them: Luke
no longer savours the shallow, luxury-encrusted life he leads (he would rather
write his book on Japanese Samurai movies), nor does Corrine want to spend her
time at parties thrown by Gay and Nan Talese (she would rather work on her screenplay
of Graham Greene's The
Heart of the Matter).
The Good Life is lit by McInerney's satirical sparks: he enjoys catching
the inanities of the over-moneyed in comments like, "You weren't really
rich till you had your own jet", or "millionaire's become so meaningless
-everybody's a millionaire". In some passages, however, his lightness of
touch deserts him, and the weight seems to come less from the grim losses of
9/11 than from the burdens of a society he can't quite rise above. Whereas in
Bright Lights a real-life figure like William Shawn was parodied elliptically
as a magazine editor referred to simply as the Druid, in The Good Life
literary celebrities are named and described, the portraits oddly duller as
a result. If one strain in American writing in the 1980s was that of the "KMart
realists" (such as Bobbie Ann Mason and Ann Beattie), the "Brat pack"
writers, McInerney and his coeval Bret Easton Ellis, seem to have forged, by
contrast, a Dolce & Gabbana realism: this novel's pages are heavy with wads
of undigested contemporaneity in the form of brand names, Hamptons locations,
celebrity chefs, chic restaurants -social references that will resonate among
a select readership and remain, for others, flat on the page.
One of the most satisfying sections, finally, is Luke's visit to Tennessee
to see his mother and his daughter, when Ashley escapes from the rehab facility
and heads straight for her grandmother's horse farm. The exchanges between Luke
and his mother about love and marital fidelity are layered and believable, and
those between father and daughter touchingly difficult (reminding one that in
Story of My
Life McInerney proved himself an able ventriloquist of young socialite women,
a trick he employs again here to great effect). Luke and his daughter decide
together whether to embrace or reject the spoiled life in New York that has
made them differently unhappy. Ambivalence is, in a sense, an inability to come
to terms with loss: a wilful refusal to accept the narrowing of choices. When
Jay McInerney's characters grow up, they have to face the families they have,
rather than dwelling on the new connections they might make, and this proves
to be a deeper source of sadness to them than the loss of the twin towers.
|
|