Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

The text of Martin Heidegger's 1927-28 university lecture course on Emmanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason presents a close interpretive reading of the first two parts of this masterpiece of modern philosophy. In this course, Heidegger continues the task he enunciated in Being and Time as the problem of dismatling the history of ontology, using temporality as a clue. Within this context the relation between philosophy, ontology, and fundamental ontology is shown to be rooted in the genesis of the modern mathematical sciences. Heidegger demonstrates that objectification of beings as beings is inseparable from knowledge a priori, the central problem of Kant's Critique. He concludes that objectification rests on the productive power of imagination, a process that involves temporality, which is the basic constitution of humans as beings.

The text of Martin Heidegger's 1927--28 university lecture course onEmmanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason presents a close interpretive reading of thefirst two parts of this masterpiece of modern philosophy. Heidegger develops hisreading of Kant against the neo-Kantianism of his day, demonstrating thatobjectification of beings as beings is inseparable from knowledge a priori, thecentral problem of Kant's Critique.

Parvis Emad is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at DePaul University and the founding co-editor (with Kenneth Maly) of Heidegger Studies. Also with Maly, he has translated Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit by Martin Heidegger and Encounters and Dialogues with Martin Heidegger by Heinrich Wiegand Petzet.

Kenneth Maly is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse and co-editor (with John Sallis) of Heraclitean Fragments. With Parvis Emad he is currently translating Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis) by Martin Heidegger.