Cart
|
|
my account
|
wish list
|
help
|
800-878-7323
Hello, |
Login
MENU
Browse
New Arrivals
Bestsellers
Featured Preorders
Award Winners
Audio Books
See All Subjects
Used
Staff Picks
Staff Picks
Picks of the Month
Bookseller Displays
50 Books for 50 Years
25 Best 21st Century Sci-Fi & Fantasy
25 PNW Books to Read Before You Die
25 Books From the 21st Century
25 Memoirs to Read Before You Die
25 Global Books to Read Before You Die
25 Women to Read Before You Die
25 Books to Read Before You Die
Gifts
Gift Cards & eGift Cards
Powell's Souvenirs
Journals and Notebooks
socks
Games
Sell Books
Blog
Events
Find A Store
Don't Miss
Big Mood Sale
Teen Dream Sale
Portland Like a Pro Sale
Powell's Author Events
Oregon Battle of the Books
Audio Books
Get the Powell's newsletter
Visit Our Stores
Powell's Staff:
Five Book Friday: In Memoriam
(0 comment)
Every year, the booksellers at Powell’s submit their Top Fives: their five favorite books that were released in 2023. It’s a list that, when put together, shows just how varied and interesting the book tastes of Powell’s booksellers are. I highly recommend digging into the recommendations — we would never lead you astray — but today...
Read More
»
Brontez Purnell:
Powell’s Q&A: Brontez Purnell, author of ‘Ten Bridges I’ve Burnt’
(0 comment)
Rachael P.:
Starter Pack: Where to Begin with Ursula K. Le Guin
(0 comment)
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Customer Comments
SocraticGadfly has commented on (2) products
Second Most Powerful Man in the World The Life of Admiral William D Leahy Roosevelts Chief of Staff
by
Phillips Payson OBrien
SocraticGadfly
, July 21, 2019
Good in the first half or so, then the wheels come badly off This at first seemed a tough book to review. But O’Brien’s own hack job later on made it easier. I was first leaning four-star, but … finally settled on three, and, had it not been for the middle section of the book, I’m not sure I’d even give it that. Fair chunks of it were solid four to four and one-half star quality. I am assuming all of Leahy’s childhood, his early military service, everything else is correct. His 1930s “battleships first, but don’t neglect naval air” attitude seems to be well summarized. Everything within World War 2 up to 1944 seems correct. He is right about Marshall being wrong about an early Overlord. He is right that Leahy helped guide the Chiefs of Staff toward Torch, and rightly so. He is right about who had power, and who did not, within Roosevelt’s Cabinet and sub-Cabinet. After that, the book is a mix of two, three, and four, star material, most of it two and three star level. First, while FDR grew more distant from Harry Hopkins, there were other elements to what happened than Leahy cutting him out, or Hopkins being too “pink” for FDR or anything else. He ignores that Hop had faced GOP attacks claiming he was using his position for personal enrichment in 1943. Also, starting with the beginning of 1944, his health went seriously downhill and never fully recovered for the rest of his life, so he couldn’t serve FDR more. Third, other people, like Ickes, when they could, help cut Hop out of the loop. And, the fact that FDR had originally intended Hopkins to help him write a speech about Yalta, but Hopkins wanted to, and did, stay in Morocco to rest, rather than return on the Quincy with FDR, should make it clear that, up until the last week’s of FDR’s life, when Hopkins’ health allowed, he was still indeed part of the inner circle. It took me just 15 minutes of Googling to find that. At this point, O’Brien’s treatment of Leahy “versus” Hopkins looks uninformed at best and mendacious at worse. Second, though he has James Frank’s “Downfall” in his bibliography, O’Brien appears to have ignored entirely its actually cogent findings, and along with that, ignored how Leahy was wrong on his stance. O’Brien also quotes not a word about Leahy’s opinion on the firebombings of Tokyo or Dresden, too, even though, near the end of the book, he claims Leahy would have considered these to also be weapons of mass destruction. Next, the “Marshall Plan.” While Stalin may have agreed to uphold his 1945 agreement with Truman on Greece, such was not the case on Turkey, even if he wasn’t planning on invading in 1948. In late 1945, Molotov (at Stalin’s orders, of course), tried to force Turkey to surrender Turkish Armenia territory to it. It also tried to get a UN mandate over formerly Italian Libya. Marshall and China? The issue is more complex than O’Brien paints. Many people, including “old China hands” at State, cautioned Chiang to settle for the rest of China and let Mao have Manchuria. There’s indications Stalin would have signed off on this. I’ve reviewed other books about post-WWII and pre-Revolution China; O’Brian is, as with Hopkins, either uninformed or mendacious. O’Brien does correctly interpret that Anglo-American hard lines on “Bizonia” contributed to Stalin’s blockade of West Berlin, so one small kudo there. Kirkus notes that this is an “opinionated” life of Leahy. It is indeed. No biography is neutral. But this one falls apart precisely at the point in history where Leahy becomes the central player in the White House. And with that, three stars.
Was this comment helpful? |
Yes
|
No
report this comment
God a Human History
by
Reza Aslan
SocraticGadfly
, December 16, 2017
This is better than much of his previous work. That said, while better than most, it's not perfect. I — even if a majority of Torah scholars disagree — think Yahweh comes from the MIdianiate "HWY," which is "to storm, blow or thunder," rather than the Hebrew "HYH," "to be." It derives easier, and gives us a Midianite version of Zeus brought into Canaan by the tribe of Judah, which probably did have a separate migration from what became known as the "northern" tribes, already there and following El. I also do not think Moses existed. Rather, the El-tribes of the north developed him, with theophoric name, deliberately. (A lot of Jewish myth comes from Egypt; not all of it is Semitic-based.) On discussing both polytheism, and even to a degree, pantheism, Azlan could have looked more at traditional beliefs of the Americas, Austronesia and sub-Saharan Africa. Those exceptions aside, and if you'll set aside expecting something with more heft, the book isn't bad.
Was this comment helpful? |
Yes
|
No
report this comment