Synopses & Reviews
andlt;Pandgt;Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, released in 1968, is perhaps the most scientifically accurate film ever produced. The film presented such a plausible, realistic vision of space flight that many moon hoax proponents believe that Kubrick staged the 1969 moon landing using the same studios and techniques. Kubrick's scientific verisimilitude in 2001 came courtesy of his science consultants--including two former NASA scientists--and the more than sixty-five companies, research organizations, and government agencies that offered technical advice. Although most filmmakers don't consult experts as extensively as Kubrick, films ranging from A Beautiful Mind and Contact to Finding Nemo and The Hulk have achieved some degree of scientific credibility because of science consultants. In Lab Coats in Hollywood, David Kirby examines the interaction of science and cinema: how science consultants make movie science plausible, how filmmakers negotiate scientific accuracy within production constraints, and how movies affect popular perceptions of science. Of course, accurate science is only important to filmmakers if they believe it generates entertainment value. Scientific expertise, Kirby points out, is most valuable to filmmakers as a tool to help them utilize their own creative expertise. Drawing on interviews and archival material, Kirby examines such science consulting tasks as fact checking, shaping visual iconography, advising actors, enhancing plausibility, creating dramatic situations, and placing science in its cultural contexts. Kirby finds that cinema can influence science as well: Depictions of science in popular films can promote research agendas, stimulate technological development, contribute to scientific controversies, and even stir citizens into political action.andlt;/Pandgt;
Review
“We all know—or think we know—what science consultants do on Hollywood films: they check accuracy. They would be wrong. David Kirby shows the relation as much more complex, and vastly more interesting than that. Hollywood wants a landscape of verisimilitude, an elaborately produced naturalness, and legitimization of their image of the future. For their part, scientists can alter the public status of their fields and gain a powerful hand in articulating visions of how their own fields might work, from supercomputing to genetic alteration. This is an original study of a field that combines real knowledge of Hollywood films, scientist-consultants and science studies. It is fun to read, taking you to the back and forth between science and film everywhere from 2001 to Contact and Minority Report. I recommend it with enthusiasm.”
—Peter Galison, Pellegrino University Professor in History of Science and Physics, Harvard University, and Producer/Director, Secrecy“Kirby makes a compelling case that scientists and filmmakers need each other. I know of no other book like it.”
—David Saltzberg, Professor of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, and Television Science Consultant“In the gap between science fact and science fiction stands the motion picture and television science consultant. In this brisk, lively account, David Kirby provides us with a history of these often unheralded scientific ambassadors to Hollywood and the critical role they play in shaping how film and television makers depict science--depictions which in turn shape how science is understood by the public at large.”
—Zack Stentz, writer/producer (Thor, X-Men: First Class, Fringe, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles)“There have been many books written on the intersection of science and Hollywood. But David Kirby’s excellent tome is the first to examine seriously the role of the science consultant in the movie-making process and assess its potential impact. Lab Coats in Hollywood is essential reading for anyone who shares Kirby’s passion for bringing science into the service of storytelling for the silver screen.”
—Jennifer Ouellette, science writer and former director, National Academy of Sciences’ Science and Entertainment Exchange“Kirby convincingly shows us that the interaction between science and cinema is not limited to the portrayal of scientists and science themes in the media, but can significantly contribute to shaping a movie’s core concepts and – even more interestingly – scientists’ own activity in the research sphere.”
—Massimiano Bucchi, Professor of Science and Technology in Society, University of Trento
Review
For that strange corner where science nut meets movie buff, this is a very enlightening book. - < -="" i="" -=""> - Science - < -="" -="">
Review
For movie-lovers everywhere, it provides a fascinating behind-the-scenes look at how art and science meet in producing motion pictures we find delightful. The MIT Press
Review
From 'prophetic' early films like 1929's Woman in the Moon science-focused movies like 2001: A Space Odyssey to admitted fiascos like The Core, Kirby's command of the subject makes for entertaining reading and, likely, more informed viewing. - < -="" i="" -=""> - Booklist - < -="" -="">
Review
"In the gap between science fact and science fiction stands the motion picture and television science consultant. In this brisk, lively account, David Kirby provides us with a history of these often unheralded scientific ambassadors to Hollywood and the critical role they play in shaping how film and television makers depict science--depictions which in turn shape how science is understood by the public at large." -- Zack Stentz , writer/producer ( Thor, X-Men: First Class, Fringe, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles) The MIT Press
Review
"Kirby convincingly shows us that the interaction between science and cinema is not limited to the portrayal of scientists and science themes in the media, but can significantly contribute to shaping a movie's core concepts and -- even more interestingly -- scientists' own activity in the research sphere." -- Massimiano Bucchi , Professor of Science and Technology in Society, University of Trento The MIT Press
Review
"Kirby makes a compelling case that scientists and filmmakers need each other. I know of no other book like it." -- David Saltzberg , Professor of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, and Television Science Consultant The MIT Press
Review
"There have been many books written on the intersection of science and Hollywood. But David Kirby's excellent tome is the first to examine seriously the role of the science consultant in the movie-making process and assess its potential impact. Lab Coats in Hollywood is essential reading for anyone who shares Kirby's passion for bringing science into the service of storytelling for the silver screen." -- Jennifer Ouellette , science writer and former director, National Academy of Sciences' Science and Entertainment Exchange The MIT Press
Review
"We all know -- or think we know -- what science consultants do on Hollywood films: they check accuracy. They would be wrong. David Kirby shows the relation as much more complex, and vastly more interesting than that. Hollywood wants a landscape of verisimilitude, an elaborately produced naturalness, and legitimization of their image of the future. For their part, scientists can alter the public status of their fields and gain a powerful hand in articulating visions of how their own fields might work, from supercomputing to genetic alteration. This is an original study of a field that combines real knowledge of Hollywood films, scientist-consultants and science studies. It is fun to read, taking you to the back and forth between science and film everywhere from 2001 to Contact and Minority Report. I recommend it with enthusiasm." -- Peter Galison , Pellegrino University Professor in History of Science and Physics, Harvard University, and Producer/Director, Secrecy The MIT Press
Review
[O]ne of the most in-depth books on the intersection of science and Hollywood to date. - < -="" i="" -=""> - Publishers Weekly - < -="" -="">
Review
"Kirby's book is honest and true, well-researched, unique, and easy to read." -- Jeff Schmerker, The Journal of Mind and Behavior The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;andquot;For movie-lovers everywhere, it provides a fascinating behind-the-scenes look at how art and science meet in producing motion pictures we find delightful.andquot; -- andlt;Iandgt;Scienceandlt;/Iandgt;andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press The MIT Press The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;andquot;For that strange corner where science nut meets movie buff, this is a very enlightening book.andquot; -- andlt;Iandgt;Booklistandlt;/Iandgt;andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;andquot;From 'prophetic' early films like 1929's Woman in the Moon science-focused movies like andlt;Iandgt;2001: A Space Odysseyandlt;/Iandgt; to admitted fiascos like andlt;Iandgt;The Coreandlt;/Iandgt;, Kirby's command of the subject makes for entertaining reading and, likely, more informed viewing.andquot; -- andlt;Iandgt;Publishers Weeklyandlt;/Iandgt;andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;andquot;[O]ne of the most in-depth books on the intersection of science and Hollywood to date.andquot; -- andlt;Iandgt;ScriptPhD.comandlt;/Iandgt;andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;andquot;Kirby's book is honest and true, well-researched, unique, and easy to read.andquot; -- andlt;Bandgt;Jeff Schmerkerandlt;/Bandgt;, andlt;Iandgt;The Journal of Mind and Behaviorandlt;/Iandgt;andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
"This is a must-read for anyone interested in popular representations of science. Kirby describes the ways that visual media interpret, naturalize, and engage with scientific theories (be they well-accepted, controversial, or fantastical), and how some scientists in turn manipulate cinematic depictions for their own ends. Plus, have I mentioned how much fun it is?"--Carla Nappi, New Books in Science, Technology, and Society The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;"In the gap between science fact and science fiction stands the motion picture and television science consultant. In this brisk, lively account, David Kirby provides us with a history of these often unheralded scientific ambassadors to Hollywood and the critical role they play in shaping how film and television makers depict science--depictions which in turn shape how science is understood by the public at large." -- andlt;Bandgt;Zack Stentz andlt;/Bandgt;, writer/producer ( andlt;Iandgt;Thorandlt;/Iandgt;, andlt;Iandgt;X-Men: First Classandlt;/Iandgt;, andlt;Iandgt;Fringeandlt;/Iandgt;, andlt;Iandgt;Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chroniclesandlt;/Iandgt;)andlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;"Kirby convincingly shows us that the interaction between science and cinema is not limited to the portrayal of scientists and science themes in the media, but can significantly contribute to shaping a movie's core concepts and -- even more interestingly -- scientists' own activity in the research sphere." -- andlt;Bandgt;Massimiano Bucchi andlt;/Bandgt;, Professor of Science and Technology in Society, University of Trentoandlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;"Kirby makes a compelling case that scientists and filmmakers need each other. I know of no other book like it." -- andlt;Bandgt;David Saltzberg andlt;/Bandgt;, Professor of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, and Television Science Consultantandlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Review
andlt;Pandgt;"There have been many books written on the intersection of science and Hollywood. But David Kirby's excellent tome is the first to examine seriously the role of the science consultant in the movie-making process and assess its potential impact. andlt;Iandgt;Lab Coats in Hollywoodandlt;/Iandgt; is essential reading for anyone who shares Kirby's passion for bringing science into the service of storytelling for the silver screen." -- andlt;Bandgt;Jennifer Ouellette andlt;/Bandgt;, science writer and former director, National Academy of Sciences' Science and Entertainment Exchangeandlt;/Pandgt; The MIT Press
Synopsis
How science consultants make movie science plausible, in films ranging from 2001: A Space Odyssey to Finding Nemo.
Synopsis
How science consultants make movie science plausible, in films ranging from 2001: A Space Odyssey to Finding Nemo.
Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, released in 1968, is perhaps the most scientifically accurate film ever produced. The film presented such a plausible, realistic vision of space flight that many moon hoax proponents believe that Kubrick staged the 1969 moon landing using the same studios and techniques. Kubrick's scientific verisimilitude in 2001 came courtesy of his science consultants -- including two former NASA scientists -- and the more than sixty-five companies, research organizations, and government agencies that offered technical advice. Although most filmmakers don't consult experts as extensively as Kubrick did, films ranging from A Beautiful Mind and Contact to Finding Nemo and The Hulk have achieved some degree of scientific credibility because of science consultants. In Lab Coats in Hollywood, David Kirby examines the interaction of science and cinema: how science consultants make movie science plausible, how filmmakers negotiate scientific accuracy within production constraints, and how movies affect popular perceptions of science.
Drawing on interviews and archival material, Kirby examines such science consulting tasks as fact checking and shaping visual iconography. Kirby finds that cinema can influence science as well: Depictions of science in popular films can promote research agendas, stimulate technological development, and even stir citizens into political action.
Synopsis
Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, released in 1968, is perhaps the most scientifically accurate film ever produced. The film presented such a plausible, realistic vision of space flight that many moon hoax proponents believe that Kubrick staged the 1969 moon landing using the same studios and techniques. Kubrick's scientific verisimilitude in 2001 came courtesy of his science consultants -- including two former NASA scientists -- and the more than sixty-five companies, research organizations, and government agencies that offered technical advice. Although most filmmakers don't consult experts as extensively as Kubrick did, films ranging from A Beautiful Mind and Contact to Finding Nemo and The Hulk have achieved some degree of scientific credibility because of science consultants. In Lab Coats in Hollywood, David Kirby examines the interaction of science and cinema: how science consultants make movie science plausible, how filmmakers negotiate scientific accuracy within production constraints, and how movies affect popular perceptions of science. Drawing on interviews and archival material, Kirby examines such science consulting tasks as fact checking and shaping visual iconography. Kirby finds that cinema can influence science as well: Depictions of science in popular films can promote research agendas, stimulate technological development, and even stir citizens into political action.
Synopsis
How science consultantsmake movie science plausible, in films ranging from 2001: A SpaceOdyssey to Finding Nemo
Synopsis
andlt;Pandgt;How science consultants make movie science plausible, in films ranging from 2001: A Space Odyssey to Finding Nemo.andlt;/Pandgt;
Synopsis
Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, released in 1968, is perhaps the most scientifically accurate film ever produced. The film presented such a plausible, realistic vision of space flight that many moon hoax proponents believe that Kubrick staged the 1969 moon landing using the same studios and techniques. Kubrick's scientific verisimilitude in 2001 came courtesy of his science consultants -- including two former NASA scientists -- and the more than sixty-five companies, research organizations, and government agencies that offered technical advice. Although most filmmakers don't consult experts as extensively as Kubrick did, films ranging from A Beautiful Mind and Contact to Finding Nemo and The Hulk have achieved some degree of scientific credibility because of science consultants. I n Lab Coats in Hollywood, David Kirby examines the interaction of science and cinema: how science consultants make movie science plausible, how filmmakers negotiate scientific accuracy within production constraints, and how movies affect popular perceptions of science. Drawing on interviews and archival material, Kirby examines such science consulting tasks as fact checking and shaping visual iconography. Kirby finds that cinema can influence science as well: Depictions of science in popular films can promote research agendas, stimulate technological development, and even stir citizens into political action.
Synopsis
andlt;Pandgt;Stanley Kubrick's andlt;Iandgt; 2001: A Space Odysseyandlt;/Iandgt;, released in 1968, is perhaps the most scientifically accurate film ever produced. The film presented such a plausible, realistic vision of space flight that many moon hoax proponents believe that Kubrick staged the 1969 moon landing using the same studios and techniques. Kubrick's scientific verisimilitude in andlt;Iandgt;2001andlt;/Iandgt; came courtesy of his science consultants -- including two former NASA scientists -- and the more than sixty-five companies, research organizations, and government agencies that offered technical advice. Although most filmmakers don't consult experts as extensively as Kubrick did, films ranging from andlt;Iandgt;A Beautiful Mindandlt;/Iandgt; and andlt;Iandgt;Contactandlt;/Iandgt; to andlt;Iandgt;Finding Nemoandlt;/Iandgt; and andlt;Iandgt;The Hulkandlt;/Iandgt; have achieved some degree of scientific credibility because of science consultants. I andlt;Iandgt;n Lab Coats in Hollywoodandlt;/Iandgt;, David Kirby examines the interaction of science and cinema: how science consultants make movie science plausible, how filmmakers negotiate scientific accuracy within production constraints, and how movies affect popular perceptions of science. Drawing on interviews and archival material, Kirby examines such science consulting tasks as fact checking and shaping visual iconography. Kirby finds that cinema can influence science as well: Depictions of science in popular films can promote research agendas, stimulate technological development, and even stir citizens into political action. andlt;/Pandgt;
About the Author
David A. Kirby is Senior Lecturer in Science Communication Studies at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine at the University of Manchester, England.