Synopses & Reviews
Over the past decade, the public's opinion of Congress has declined—election after election—to record lows. Mark J. Rozell examines the electorate's ongoing disgust with its legislature and the reasons for it. Putting recent Congresses in historical perspective, he notes that our modern representatives are actually lesS≪/i> corrupt than those of the past, due in large measure to increased public scrutiny and ongoing tightening of ethics and conflict of interest rules. Still, the public remains skeptical, indeed hostile, toward that most representative of our national institutions. Rozell finds that much of the blame goes to highly negative press coverage of the Congress, and government in general, and that while Congress has always been a favorite target of critics and comedians, healthy skepticism has now largely been replaced by a debilitating cynicism that undermines the foundations of representative government. A major study which will be of interest to scholars and students of American politics, government, and media.
Review
Rozell has uncovered one striking conclusion: the press rewards congressional activism. He correctly points out that this preference for activism is at odds with the institutional forces in Congress which promote deliberation and inaction....Rozell's study is persuasive and valuable.Congress &The Presidency
Description
Includes bibliographical references (p. [139]-140) and index.
About the Author
MARK J. ROZELL is Associate Professor of Political Science at American University and a Lecturer in the Catholic University graduate program in congressional studies.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The Era of Neglect (1946-early 1960s)
The Era of Discovery (1965-mid-1970s)
The Era of Cynicism I (1977-early 1990s)
The Era of Cynicism II (1990s)
Contempt of Congress: Sources and Recommendations
Selected Bibliography
Index