Synopses & Reviews
The Supreme Court Review provides a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions.
About the Author
Geoffrey R. Stone is the Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor in the Law Schoool at the University of Chicago. From 1987 to 1993 he served as dean of the Law School, and from 1993 to 2002 he served as provost of the University of Chicago. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a Fellow of the American Philosophical Society, and a member of the American Law Institute.
Table of Contents
Which Question? Which Lie? Reflections on the Physician-Assisted Suicide Cases
Martha Minow
The Value of Seeing Things Differently: Boerne v Flores and Congressional Enforcement of the Bill of Rights
David Cole
Congressional Power and Religious Liberty after City of Boerne v Flores
Christopher L. Eisgruber, Lawrence G. Sager.
Freedom of Speech, Shielding Children, and Transcending Balancing
Eugene Volokh
Printz, State Sovereignty, and the Limits of Formalism
Evan H. Caminker
O'Hagan's Problems
Victor Brudney
Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment
David A. Sklansky
Entrenching the Duopoly: Why the Supreme Court Should not Allow the States to Protect the Democrats and Republicans from Political Competition
Richard L. Hasen
"The Ideal New Frontier Judge"
Dennis J. Hutchinson
The Court and the Corporation: Jurisprudence, Localism, and Federalism
Gregory A. Mark
Do not Go Gently into that Good Right: the First Amendment in the High Court of Australia
Gerald N. Rosenberg, John M. Williams.