Synopses & Reviews
Accountability is regarded as a central feature of modern constitutionalism. At a general level, this prominence is perhaps unsurprising, given the long history of the idea. However, in many constitutional democracies, including the UK and the USA, it has acquired a particular resonance in contemporary circumstances with the declining power of social deference, the expanding reach of populist accountability mechanisms, and the increasing willingness of citizens to find mechanisms for challenging official decision-making. These essays, by public law scholars, seek to explore how ideas of and mechanisms associated with accountability play a part in the contemporary constitution. While the majority of contributors concentrate on the United Kingdom, others provide comparative discussion with particular reference to the United States and aspects of European Union law.
The main focus of the volume is the contemporary UK constitution. Chapters are included which analyze the historical context (including the role of Dicey), common law constitutionalism, the constitutional role of Parliament, the constitutional role of the courts, judicial accountability, human rights protection under the constitution and the contribution of non-judicial accountability mechanisms. Further chapters explore the public service principle, the impact of new public management on public service delivery, and the relationship between accountability and regulation. Finally accountability is discussed in the light of constitutional reform including the challenges posed by the 'multi-layered' government at the supra national level of EU membership and sub-national national levels of devolution and local government.
About the Author
Nicholas Bamforth,
Fellow in Law, The Queen's College, Oxford,Peter Leyland,
Professor of Public Law, London Metropolitan UniversityNicholas Bamforth is a Fellow in Law at The Queen's College, Oxford. His research focuses on public law, human rights, and discrimination law. His publications include: Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality and Gender: A Critique of New Natural Law (with D Richards) and Discrimination Law - Theory in Context: Text and Materials (with M Malik and C O'Cinneide, 2008).
Peter Leyland is Professor of Public Law at London Metropolitan University. He co-edits the Constitutional Systems of the World series and is the author of numerous books and articles on constitutional law, administrative law, and comparative public law, including The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis (2012) and Textbook on Administrative Law (7th edition, with G Anthony, 2012).
Nicholas Bamforth and Peter Leyland jointly edited Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (2003).
Table of Contents
Introduction: Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution,
Nicholas Bamforth and Peter LeylandThe Spirits of the Constitution, John Allison
Judicial Accountability in Comparative Perspective, Mark Tushnet
Accountability to Law, TRS Allan
Adjudication as Accountability: A Deliberative Approach, Sandra Fredman
The Instrumental Value of Legal Accountability, Jeff King
Accountability, Human Rights Adjudication and the Human Rights Act, Alison Young
Accountability and Judicial Review in the UK and EU: Central Precepts, Paul Craig
Parliamentary Accountability and the Judicial System, Andrew Le Sueur
Ombudsmen, Tribunals, Inquiries: Re-fashioning Accountability Beyond the Courts, Mark Elliott
Accountability of and to the Legislature, Nicholas Bamforth
Accountability and the Foundations of British Democracy - the Public Interest and Public Service Principles, Dawn Oliver
Multi-layered Constitutional Accountability and the Refinancing of Territorial Governance in the UK, Peter Leyland
Beyond New Public Management: Problems of Accountability in the Modern Administrative State, Anne Davies
Regulatory Accountability: Capacities, Challenges, and Prospects, Julia Black
Legal Accountability and Social Justice, Colm O'Cinneide