Synopses & Reviews
Although the rational choice approach toward political behavior has been severely criticized, its adherents claim that competing models have failed to offer a more scientific model of political decisionmaking. This measured but provocative book offers precisely that: an alternative way of understanding political behavior based on cognitive research.
The authors draw on research in neuroscience, physiology, and experimental psychology to conceptualize habit and reason as two mental states that interact in a delicate, highly functional balance controlled by emotion. Applying this approach to more than fifteen years of election results, they shed light on a wide range of political behavior, including party identification, symbolic politics, and negative campaigning.
About the Author
George E. Marcus is a professor of political science at Williams College.
W. Russell Neuman is a professor of communication at the Annenberg School for Communication and director of the Information and Society Program, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.
Michael MacKuen is the Burton Craige professor of political science at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
1. Coming to Rational Choice
2. Human Affect in the Western Tradition
3. Drawing from the Neurosciences
4. Dual Affective Subsystems: Disposition and Surveillance
5. Emotion and Political Behavior
6. Emotion and Political Judgment
7. Affective Politics
Appendix A: Affective Intelligence and the Dual Model of Emotional Systems
Appendix B: Toward a Measurement Theory of Political Affect
Appendix C: Suggestions for Further Reading
References
Index