Synopses & Reviews
Monte Johnson examines the most controversial aspects of Aristiotle's natural philosophy: his teleology. Is teleology about causation or explanation? Does it exclude or obviate mechanism, determinism, or materialism? Is it focused on the good of individual organisms, or is god or man the ultimate end of all processes and entities? Is teleology restricted to living things, or does it apply to the cosmos as a whole? Does it identify objectively existent causes in the world, or is it merely a heuristic for our understanding of other causal processes? Johnson argues that Aristotle's aporetic approach drives a middle course between these traditional oppositions, and avoids the dilemma, frequently urged against teleology, between backwards causation and anthropomorphism. Although these issues have been debated with extraordinary depth by Aristotle scholars, and touched upon by many in the wider philosophical and scientific community as well, there is no comprehensive historical treatment of the issue.
Aristotle is commonly considered the inventor of teleology, although the precise term originated in the eighteenth century. If teleology means the use of ends and goals in natural science, then Aristotle was rather a critical innovator of teleological explanation. Teleological notions were widespread among his predecessors, but Aristotle rejected their conception of extrinsic causes such as mind or god as the primary causes for natural things. Aristotle's radical alternative was to assert nature itself as an internal principle of change and an end, and his teleological explanations focus on the intrinsic ends of natural substances - those ends that benefit the natural thing itself.
Aristotle's use of ends was subsequently conflated with incompatible "teleological" notions, including proofs for the existence of a providential or designer god, vitalism and animism, opposition to mechanism and non-teleological causation, and anthropocentrism. Johnson addresses these misconceptions through an elaboration of Aristotle's methodological statements, as well as an examination of the explanations actually offered in the scientific works.
Review
"Aristotle on Teleology is an important contribution to Aristotelian scholarship."--Devin Henry, Ancient Philosophy
"A comprehensive and stimulating study on an important topic. Anybody interested in teleology will want to read and probe the arguments of this book"--Thomas Johansen, Notre Dame Philosophical Review
"A very complete survey of a central concept of Aristotle's thought"--Thronton Lockwood, Bryn Mawr Classical Review
"A valuable contribution to the field of Aristotelian studies"--Andrea Falcon, Rhizai
Synopsis
Aristotle's has been the most influential philosophy in the whole history of science. Monte Johnson examines its most controversial aspect: Aristotle's emphasis on the importance of goals and purposes to scientific understanding--his teleology. In some cases this policy has proved deeply flawed, for example in his earth-centric cosmology, or his anthropology purporting to justify slavery and male domination. But in many areas Aristotle's teleology has been successful, and remains influential, for example in adaptationist evolutionary theory, embryology, and genetics. Johnson's book shows also how Aristotle's theory has profound implications for environmental ethics and for the theory of value in general.
About the Author
Monte Ransome Johnson is Professor of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Part I. Teleology as a Critical Explanatory Framework
1. Historical background to the interpretation of Aristotle's teleology
2. Preliminary study of Aristotle's causes
3. Teleological notions
4. Teleological dialectic
Part II. Teleological Explanations in Natural Science
5. Teleology and elements
6. Teleology and organisms I: general principles
7. Teleology and organisms II: specific explanations
8. Teleology and humans
9. Teleology and the cosmos
10. Conclusion