Synopses & Reviews
The United States faces a small number of rogue states that either have or are working to acquire weapons of mass destruction. These NASTIs, or NBC-Arming Sponsors of Terrorism and Intervention, include such states as North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya, and Syria. U.S. nonproliferation programs and policies have helped to keep this number small, but U.S. and allied counterproliferation programs are essential to reduce the danger. It is up to deterrence, active defenses, passive defenses, decontamination, and counterforce to turn enemy weapons of mass destruction into instruments of limited destructive effect.
Warfighters will also have to adopt a different strategy and concept of operations in fighting an adversary that is so heavily armed. This strategy will feature a combination of deception, dispersion, mobility and maneuver, diffused logistics, remote engagement, missile defense bubbles, non-combatant evacuation operations, and large area decontamination. It will also involve upgrades to NBC passive defense measures and equipment, as well as a counterforce capability that can find and destroy a variety of adversary targets, including mobile launchers and deeply buried and hardened underground structures.
Review
[B]arry Schneider offers an excellent brief on the current situation and military options for dealing with nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) threats in the future battlespace.Marine Corps Gazette
Review
Schneider provides some of the most impressive open-source maps situating.Military Review
Synopsis
A study of defense requirements in deterrence, active and passive defense, decontamination, counterforce, and military strategy when confronting an opponent armed with nuclear, biological, chemical, or missile capabilities on the battlefields of the future.
Synopsis
The United States faces a small number of rogue states that either have or are working to acquire weapons of mass destruction. These NASTIs, or NBC-Arming Sponsors of Terrorism and Intervention, include such states as North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya, and Syria. U.S. nonproliferation programs and policies have helped to keep this number small, but U.S. and allied counterproliferation programs are essential to reducing the danger. It is up to deterrence, active defenses, passive defenses, decontamination, and counterforce to turn enemy weapons of mass destruction into instruments of limited destructive effect.
About the Author
BARRY R. SCHNEIDER is Director of the USAF Counterproliferation Center at Air University, Maxwell AFB, Alabama, and Associate Professor of International Relations in the Department of Future Conflict Studies at the U.S. Air War College.
Table of Contents
NASTIs: The Threat from Iraq
Other Bullies on Other Blocks
The Counterproliferation Initiative
Deterring Adversary NBC Attacks
Passive Defenses against Chemical and Biological Attacks
Theater Missile Defenses: Key to Future Operations
Offensive Action: A Viable Option?
Principles of War for the WMD Battlefield
Defeating the Enemy's Military Strategy
Index