Synopses & Reviews
This book calls for a pragmatic approach to contemporary U.S. social problems, stressing workable outcomes regardless of their ideological origin, be they conservative, pluralistic, or radical. The policy analysis, grounded in social science research, claims that there is a broad cultural consensus on American values and a public willingness to help others in need. This critique of the three dominant ideologies extracts ideas, approaches, policies, and programs from each and proposes an eclectic “outcomes” perspective rooted in American pragmatism.
Review
“In
Pragmatic Liberalism, Albert Hunter and Carl Milofsky bring hope in a dark time. This lively and scholarly book expands our vision of what a civil society can and should accomplish. The authors pragmatic ideas of citizenship will help move social thought beyond tiresome ideological arguments and will renew readers desire to break policy stalemates by shouldering the responsibilities of leadership. With well-chosen examples, Hunter and Milofsky demonstrate how we can bring about positive social change in organizations, communities, and nations.”
--William Kornblum, Chair, Center for Urban Research and Professor of Sociology, Graduate Center, C.U.N.Y. "Courageous and innovative, yet sensitivity balanced, Hunter and Milofsky cut through the isms and excuses to formulate clear, reasoned solutions to fundamental policy issues. Social scientists, mayors, foundation officials, journalists, and talk show hosts should read and discuss this fresh new perspective." --Terry Nichols Clark, University of Chicago
Synopsis
This book analyzes the problems of U.S. politics and public policy and proposes a solution rooted in a deep American consensus that often goes unrecognized. The authors critique three dominant ideological perspectives - conservative, radical, and liberal - and propose a fourth eclectic 'outcomes' perspective rooted in American pragmatism.
Synopsis
This book calls for a pragmatic approach to contemporary U.S. social problems, stressing workable outcomes regardless of their ideological origin, be they conservative, pluralistic, or radical. The policy analysis, grounded in social science research, claims that there is a broad cultural consensus on American values and a public willingness to help others in need. This critique of the three dominant ideologies extracts ideas, approaches, policies, and programs from each and proposes an eclectic “outcomes” perspective rooted in American pragmatism.
About the Author
Albert Hunter is professor of Sociology at Northwestern University. Hunter has published numerous books and articles, including
Symbolic Communities (1974) and
Multimethod Research (1989).
Carl Milofsky is Professor of Sociology at Bucknell University and author of
Community Organizations (1988) among others.
Table of Contents
Prologue * Malaise * Rights * Why Help? * Markets, Inequality, and Social Efficiency: The Conservative View * Class Conflict and the Radical View of the Common Good * The Constructive Chaos of Pluralism * Institutions, Social Policy, and the Death of the Old Social Science * Moral Policy * Implementing Pragmatic Liberalism: Leadership, Citizenship, and Community