Synopses & Reviews
The past 15 years have seen declining public support for European integration, and widespread suggestions that a legitimacy crisis faces the European Union (EU). Many in the EU have believed that this problem could be effectively tackled by vesting greater powers in the European Parliament (EP), the Union's only directly-elected institution. The central argument of this book is that, while considerable efforts have been made to increase the status of the EP, it is in crucial respects a failure as a representative body. This failure is grounded in the manner in which the parliament is elected. The electoral systems used for EP elections in many EU countries are actively obstructive of Europe's voters being represented in the way that they are most likely to respond positively towards. While the behaviour of EP members is shaped strongly by the electoral systems under which they are elected (which vary across the 25 member-states of the EU), the electoral systems currently in place push most of them to behave in ways contrary to what citizens desire. Drawing on public opinion data, surveys of MEPs and considerable qualitative interview evidence, this book shows that the failure of parliamentary representation in the EU has a strong foundation in electoral institutions.
Review
"Farrell and Scully's study not only gives a comprehensive, accessible, and up-to-date overview of the electoral rules under which the EP is elected, it also offers an insightful analysis of two sources of empirical data: surveys of MEPs from all member states and face-to face interviews with British MEPs... Farrell and Scully's book makes an important contribution to academic discussions on the EP, as well as to the research on electoral systems more generally."--Political Science Quarterly
About the Author
David M. Farrell is Jean Monnet Chair in European Politics and Head of School of Social Sciences at the University of Manchester.
Roger Scully is Reader in Political Science at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth.