Synopses & Reviews
Unlike its British forebears, the early American magazine, or "periodical miscellany," functioned in culture as a forum driven by manifold contributions and perpetuated by reader response. Arising in colonial Philadelphia, America's more "democratic" magazine sustained a range of conflicting ideas, norms, and beliefs--indeed, it promoted their very exchange. It invited and embraced competing voices, particularly during the first 75 years of the Republic. In this first-ever account of the early American magazine as a distinct form, Amy Beth Aronson reveals how such participatory dynamics and public visibility offered special advantages to women, especially to those with sufficient education, access, and financial means, for whom "ladies magazines" offered unusual opportunities for self-expression, collective discussion, and cultural response. Moreover, the genre opened and sustained dialogue among contributors, whose competing voices played off each other, provoking rebuttal and revision by subsequent contributors and noncontributing readers. This free play of discourse positioned women's words in a uniquely productive way, offering a kind of community of women readers who, together, wrote and revised magazine content and collectively negotiated and authorized new language for a new public's use.
Review
...this is a thoughtful book tha provides a good overview of early women's magazines. Recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty; general readers.Choice
Review
[T]his is an insightful, intelligent, important book. It shows early women's magazine readers as practive agents in creation of meaning, and it illustrates the complexity of a much-maligned magazine form.American Journalism
Synopsis
Offers the first-ever analysis of the American women's magazine as a distinct form, as well as a presentation of the construction of the popular woman reader.
Synopsis
Unlike its British forebears, the early American magazine, or "periodical miscellany," functioned in culture as a forum driven by manifold contributions and perpetuated by reader response. Arising in colonial Philadelphia, America's more "democratic" magazine sustained a range of conflicting ideas, norms, and beliefs--indeed, it promoted their very exchange. It invited and embraced competing voices, particularly during the first 75 years of the Republic. In this first-ever account of the early American magazine as a distinct form, Amy Beth Aronson reveals how it positioned women's words in a uniquely productive way, offering a kind of community of women readers who, together, wrote and revised magazine content and collectively negotiated and authorized new language for a new public's use.
About the Author
AMY BETH ARONSON is an independent author. She is the co-editor of The Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinity, The Gendered Society: Readings, and Charlotte Perkins Gilman's Women and Economics.
Table of Contents
Introduction: I Want My Mademoiselle: Guilt, Pleasure, and the Politics of Participation in the American Women's Magazine
Taking Liberties: Democracy and Dynamics in America's Magazine
Audience Engagements: Constructing the Popular Woman Reader
Sons of Liberty and Their Silenced Sisters: Rising to Self-Representation in the Women's Magazines of the Early Republic
Understanding Equals: Identity and Community in Sarah Hale's (American) Ladies' Magazine
Media Makeovers: Converting the Popular to Politics in America's First Feminist Magazines
Epilogue: Where Are They Now? Women's Voices and the Mass Market Magazine