Synopses & Reviews
As communism collapses into ruins, Boris Groys provokes our interest in the aesthetic goals pursued with such catastrophic consequences by its founders. Interpreting totalitarian art and literature in the context of cultural history, this brilliant essay likens totalitarian aims to the modernists' demands that art should move from depicting to transforming the world. The revolutionaries of October 1917 promised to create a society that was not only more just and more economically stable but also more beautiful, and they intended that the entire life of the nation be completely subordinate to Communist party leaders commissioned to regulate, harmonize, and create a single "artistic" whole out of even the most minute details. What were the origins of this idea? And what were its artistic and literary ramifications? In addressing these issues, Groys questions the view that socialist realism was an "art for the masses." Groys argues instead that the "total art" proposed by Stalin and his followers was formulated by well-educated elites who had assimilated the experience of the avant-garde and been brought to socialist realism by the future-oriented logic of avant-garde thinking. After explaining the internal evolution of Stalinist art, Groys shows how socialist realism gradually disintegrated after Stalin's death. In an undecided and insecure Soviet culture, artists focused on restoring historical continuity or practicing "sots art," a term derived from the combined names of socialist realism (sotsrealizm) and pop art. Increasingly popular in the West, sots-artists incorporate the Stalin myth into world mythology and demonstrate its similarity to supposedly opposing myths.
Review
"Herman Goering said that when he heard the word 'culture' he reached for his gun. Stalin had a different reaction: when he heard the word 'revolution,' he reached out for the most banal, timid, and obedient artists and writers and composers he could find. The idea was of course to transform culture the way bolshevism transformed politics, and to a frightening extent it succeeded. This essay by a German historian deserves a wide audience." Reviewed by Daniel Weiss, Virginia Quarterly Review (Copyright 2006 Virginia Quarterly Review)
Review
One of Choice's Outstanding Academic Titles for 1992
Review
"Art and the celebration of power all too often coincide, and the controversial message here is that artists, for all their insights into the human condition, can make a hash of society as completely as the most cynical of politicians."
--Boston Globe
Description
Includes bibliographical references (p. [121]-126).
Table of Contents
| Introduction: The Culture of the Stalin Era in Historical Perspective | 3 |
Ch. 1 | The Russian Avant-Garde: The Leap over Progress | 14 |
| White Humanity | 15 |
| Red Agitation | 19 |
Ch. 2 | The Stalinist Art of Living | 33 |
| Judgment Day for World Culture | 37 |
| The Typology of the Nonexistent | 50 |
| The Earthly Incarnation of the Demiurge | 56 |
Ch. 3 | Postutopian Art: From Myth to Mythology | 75 |
| The Lost Horizon | 81 |
| The Avant-Garde Artist as the "Little Man" | 84 |
| Stalin's Best Pupils | 89 |
| Poet and Militiaman | 95 |
| A Cruel Talent | 99 |
| Chronicler of the Kremlin | 102 |
Ch. 4 | Designers of the Unconscious and Their Audience | 113 |
| Notes | 121 |