Synopses & Reviews
In recent years, the Sarbanes-Oxley-Act has received international attention unlike few other laws. The rules presented in this act take influence on business practice and dominate the ongoing discussion on business constitution in the USA as well as in Europe. Christiane Strohm investigates the effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley-Act and the revised 8th EU-Directive on auditing. The results of her first experiment indicate that there is a difference in the communication and safeguarding effects of a regulation, depending on the precision of its wording. Findings of her second experiment show that safeguarding effects also depend on auditors' monetary incentives and on perceived costs of litigation. The author also tests the effectiveness of a transparency report which is proposed by the European Union. The most important safeguards (policies and procedures) are perceived to be quality assurance, internal quality controls and independence practice and compliance.
Synopsis
Christiane Strohm investigates the effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley-Act and the revised 8th EU-Directive on auditing. She shows that there is a difference in the communication and safeguarding effects of a regulation, depending on the precision of its wording and that safeguarding effects also depend on auditors' monetary incentives and on perceived costs of litigation.
About the Author
Dr. Christiane Strohm promovierte bei Prof. Dr. Christoph Watrin am Institut für Unternehmensrechnung und -besteuerung der Universität Münster. Sie ist zur Zeit Visiting Scholar an der University of Southern California, Leventhal School of Accounting, Los Angeles.
Table of Contents
Auditor Independence Risk Prior Research on Auditor Independence Auditor Independence Regulation Task Complexity and Hypotheses Development Empirical Studies on Auditor Independence Regulation Consequences from the Empirical Findings for the European Capital Market