Synopses & Reviews
Well-Being and Death addresses philosophical questions about death and the good life: what makes a life go well? Is death bad for the one who dies? How is this possible if we go out of existence when we die? Is it worse to die as an infant or as a young adult? Is it bad for animals and fetuses to die? Can the dead be harmed? Is there any way to make death less bad for us? Ben Bradley defends the following views: pleasure, rather than achievement or the satisfaction of desire, is what makes life go well; death is generally bad for its victim, in virtue of depriving the victim of more of a good life; death is bad for its victim at times after death, in particular at all those times at which the victim would have been living well; death is worse the earlier it occurs, and hence it is worse to die as an infant than as an adult; death is usually bad for animals and fetuses, in just the same way it is bad for adult humans; things that happen after someone has died cannot harm that person; the only sensible way to make death less bad is to live so long that no more good life is possible.
Review
"Bradley's book is chock full of interesting and fruitful ideas. It advances the scholarly debate about death and its harmfulness. Anyone who contributes to or follows that debate will want to read Well-being and Death."--Steven Luper, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
About the Author
Ben Bradley is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Syracuse University. He has published articles in journals such as
Nous, Mind, Ethics, and
Philosophical Studies, on such topics as the evil of death, the nature of desire, and theories of well-being.
Table of Contents
Introduction
1. Well-Being
2. The Evil of Death
3. Existence and Time
4. Does Psychology Matter?
5. Can Death be Defeated?
Conclusion
Bibliography