Synopses & Reviews
Why is English synonymous with literature in the United States? At the turn of the twentieth century, literature courses were taught in the original language, and English did not signify literature any more than did French, Italian, or other modern languages. Fifty years later, English had colonized literature, and non-English literatures became configured as "foreign language study." This timely and important intervention into an on-going debate shows how the multilingual population of American faculty and students became progressively more monoglot, as did the configuration of literary studies. Thomas Paul Bonfiglio locates these changes within the anti-immigration, xenophobic, anti-labor, mercantile, militarist, and technocratic ideologies that arose in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century and recommends the return of literary studies and the humanities to their roots.
Review
"Why is English Literature? opens a fresh perspective on current discussions of globalization and transnationalism that will enliven literary studies in English and American literature departments." - John Michael, University of Rochester, USA
Synopsis
Why is English synonymous with literature in the United States? Bonfiglio contextualizes the rising hegemony of English within the anti-labor, anti-immigration, xenophobic, mercantile, militarist, and technocratic ideologies that arose in the US in the first half of twentieth century.
About the Author
Thomas Paul Bonfiglio is Professor of Literature and Linguistics in the Department of Modern Literatures and Cultures at the University of Richmond, USA. He is the author of Race and the Rise of Standard American (2002) and Mother Tongues and Nations: The Invention of the Native Speaker (2010). In 2012, he was Guest Professor in Sociolinguistics at the University of Verona, Italy.
Table of Contents
Introduction
1. English and the Languages
2. From ars liber to Modern Literatures
3. The American Century
Conclusion: Language Needs New Language