50
Used, New, and Out of Print Books - We Buy and Sell - Powell's Books
Cart |
|  my account  |  wish list  |  help   |  800-878-7323
Hello, | Login
MENU
  • Browse
    • New Arrivals
    • Bestsellers
    • Featured Preorders
    • Award Winners
    • Audio Books
    • See All Subjects
  • Used
  • Staff Picks
    • Staff Picks
    • Picks of the Month
    • Bookseller Displays
    • 50 Books for 50 Years
    • 25 Best 21st Century Sci-Fi & Fantasy
    • 25 PNW Books to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Books From the 21st Century
    • 25 Memoirs to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Global Books to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Women to Read Before You Die
    • 25 Books to Read Before You Die
  • Gifts
    • Gift Cards & eGift Cards
    • Powell's Souvenirs
    • Journals and Notebooks
    • socks
    • Games
  • Sell Books
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Find A Store

PowellsBooks.Blog
Authors, readers, critics, media − and booksellers.

Review-a-Day

In Our Control: The Complete Guide to Contraceptive Choices for Women

by Review-a-Day, November 7, 2010 12:00 AM
In Our Control: The Complete Guide to Contraceptive Choices for WomenIn Our Control: The Complete Guide to Contraceptive Choices for Women by Laura Eldridge

Reviewed by Bonnie B. Lee

Bookslut

Young women discover very quickly that navigating their sexuality is a perilous journey through treacherous and unforgiving waters. With whom, when, how soon, how often, even just how, not to mention the adjacent Scylla and Charybdis whirlpools of pregnancy/reproduction and femininity (and the proper expressions thereof) -- the rocky shoals are narrower and stretch on for longer than any of them have been prepared for. They are fifteenth-century Portuguese sailors in search of the Spice Islands who have ended up, bafflingly, in Argentina.

In Our Control: The Complete Guide to Contraceptive Choices for Women seeks not only to put women at the helm -- quite literally, in control of their sexual bodies -- but to provide a more accurately rendered map of the contraceptive and reproductive landscape. Laura Eldridge, a disciple of pioneering women's health activist Barbara Seaman, expands upon her mentor's lifelong work to better inform women of the risks and dangers of contraceptives in addition to championing their benefits.

Any discussion of contraception nowadays begins, and very often ends, with The Pill. Having just celebrated its fiftieth birthday, younger women may take for granted the easy accessibility of hormonal oral contraceptives, but pharmaceutically speaking, it is a recent invention whose longterm effects are still unknown. Only now is the first generation of women on The Pill reaching postmenopausal age. Although fifty years may be short in medical technology terms, it is a very long time for such a popular and widely prescribed drug to have been hardly improved upon or rigorously researched since its introduction. (Eldridge finds that newer is not always better; two recently released oral contraceptives, Yaz and Yasmin, have been tainted with lawsuits, false advertising claims, negligent trial methods, and even deaths, and the patch contraceptive's fall from grace in the past five years was rightly precipitous.)

Many would argue that any drug, whether exclusively for women or not, comes with risks and side effects. Unfortunately, the emphasis on contraceptive development has been on what is suspiciously most profitable for drug makers, not on what meets the needs and lifestyles of female consumers. Thus women are subject to the marketing ploys of drug makers and vulnerable to their underlying messages packaged in girly, pastel-toned advertisements that shrewdly co-opt the very language of feminism and empowerment.

Some of these messages are more alarming than others. One such claim that underpins Seasonale and Lybrel is that menstruation is such a debilitating and inconvenient nuisance that it should be eliminated entirely. Early in the reproductive rights movement, the medicalization of the female body was a boon that granted greater access to contraceptive options in the privacy of a doctor's office and shed the issue of moral implications and shielded reproductive choice from social scrutiny. Now, the medicalization of the female body has produced science that seems to negate a woman's body altogether. As difficult as a monthly cycle may be for some, studies show that the majority of women would be more uncomfortable having absolutely no periods at all. Such drugs treat what is central to mature womanhood as essentially a disease that can be cured.

Though Eldridge is careful not to advocate for one option over another, she stresses the advantages of largely unexplored nonhormonal barrier methods. It is a testament to the success of oral contraceptive advertisers that women feel the only longterm option available to them is a hormonal one, The Pill, and that it is unquestionably safe. Whither the diaphragm, or the sponge? These options are not as profitable for makers but are more affordable for consumers and can be extremely effective in pregnancy prevention when used properly.

Eldridge isn't just out to suckerpunch and dropkick the big, bad, Big Pharma Monster, though. So much of current medical knowledge of fertility and menstruation are tangled with social assumptions about women (PMS is one such example) that it becomes impossible to separate them out, further complicating our understanding of contraception but highlighting the need for more discussion and more pressure regarding safety, research, and product development.

What Eldridge rightly points out is that discussions of contraceptive methods (versus those of other prescription drugs as say, Lipitor or Zyrtec) are particularly hazardous to women for all the surrounding issues they activate, underscore, or even explode -- those issues, that is, that starkly highlight gender difference and inequality. Such discussions have frustratingly inevitable moral overtones in an American context. No, more birth control options do not promote promiscuity, and limiting options clearly does not reduce teen pregnancy rates. Birth control is not just for "loose" young single women in college or the city but for those in committed relationships or for those who are family planning, or perimenopausal, among other reasons. I wonder that these things need to be explained and stated aloud over and over again; I also wonder if those same polemicists even care to listen.

But perhaps pregnancy prevention is not what is most centrally at stake for those who talk about contraceptives (as opposed to those who use them). Concurrent with the increased presence of women in universities, workplaces, and authority positions, The Pill underscored a deep mid-century anxiety about the extent of woman's power -- and man's place beside her. Such heightened social tensions found their expressions (still do) in reproductive rights, making a woman's body the battleground for social concerns that are abstracted and distanced from any individual's health.

This is just one thesis of many explored in Eldridge's cogent and tightly presented book. In Our Control feels particularly germane here and now, in America, where sex education varies wildly and is based largely on the accident of where you happened to attend public school. Eldridge's book combines serious digging through medical journal articles with first-person interviews of anonymous everywomen. A woman's knowledge of contraception, and sexuality in general, can be mostly sourced to the anecdotal experiences shared in a private setting amongst friends, and the rest back to a state-mandated junior high health class. Eldridge expands that circle of intimates, broadening our knowledge and indirectly, our experiences by filling in where medical research so far has been silent or absent or inconclusively contradictory. According to Eldridge, more choice is irrefutably better, but what constitutes the best or most desirable contraceptive is not always clear, especially when those very choices have so many attendant and unpublicized hazards. The needs of different populations across America, not just of the young and unmarried, and of populations in various parts of the world, are all relevant in this highly important discussion that Eldridge capably presents. This is an issue that touches everyone, everywhere, including men.

Eldridge's book is extensively researched and footnoted, not shying away (thankfully) from scientific terminology and precise chemical structures. Eldridge isn't a scientist, but a woman doesn't have to be a biochemist or a medical doctor to be better informed of what she puts into her body, and ultimately, how it affects her. Though it may appear to be a handbook or reference guide, In Our Control delves into history, science, politics, popular culture, current affairs, and notions of modernity and femininity in densely informational but highly accessible prose. Many intelligent young women shrink from the "feminist" label, but Eldridge is a young, bright exemplar of modern femininity who continues the important journey of her map-charting forebears.




Books mentioned in this post

In Our Control: The Complete Guide to Contraceptive Choices for Women

Eldridge, Laura
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##

Most Read

  1. Best Books of 2022: Fiction by Powell's Staff
  2. The Big List of Backlist: Books That Got Us Through 2022 by Powell's Staff
  3. 25 Books to Read Before You Die: 21st Century by Powell's Staff
  4. Powell's 2023 Book Preview: The First Quarter by Powell's Staff
  5. 7 Essential Authors Recommend Their 7 Essential Sci-Fi and Fantasy Books by Powell's Staff

Blog Categories

  • Interviews
  • Original Essays
  • Lists
  • Q&As
  • Playlists
  • Portrait of a Bookseller
  • City of Readers
  • Required Reading
  • Powell's Picks Spotlight

3 Responses to "In Our Control: The Complete Guide to Contraceptive Choices for Women"

ellis glazier November 8, 2010 at 05:54 AM
either the reviewer or the author, if the reviewer is parroting her, have clearly mistated fact, or maybe they are too young to to have lived through the time cycle about which they are writing. unfortunately many people think of history as only that time they have experienced. the statemnt that 'only now is the first generation of women on the pill reaching post menopausal age' is clearly a fantasy of the young. in 1958 i went to work at the worcester foundation for experimental biology, shrewsbury, MA, for gregory pincus, who with john rock were the 'fathers of the pill'. they had completed all of the long clinical trials and the pill was just being released for sale by the g.d. searle co. because we had two children and did not want more, my wife went on the pill, just as many other older women did. i do not know the numbers of patients using the drug, but i believe that shortly it came into the millions, a large number of whom were not young girls. moreover, to be of a generation now that is just reaching postmenopausal age, they would have had to start using the pill at birth or near that. this is not plausable. because my wife is now 80, i have to assumke that she is well past menopause as are all the other adult women who used the pill for long periods way back when. the second flight of fancy is the statement that the past 50 years is a long time for a drug to not have been improved on or rigorously redearched for all that time. it would have been worthwhile for some knowledgeable editor to get at this to clear out such ridiculous comments. in the few years i was at the worcester foundation, and for long afterward, the science surrounding conception and the prevention of it were rigotously researched, as it was in a number of other labs, and still is. further, the drug itself has been changed numerous times in terms of dosage and composition in attempts to reduce or eliminate side effects. it is true that newer is not always better, or even as good as,

Betsy November 7, 2010 at 07:44 AM
Good review but one factual error. "Only now is the first generation of women on The Pill reaching postmenopausal age." Women - like my mother, who was born in 1916 - were taking the pill in the 1960s; they are long past reaching postmenopausal age.

ellis glazier November 7, 2010 at 05:22 AM
i do not know whether the reviewer was giving her thoughts on the subject or the author's, but there are some misleaing statements made. 1. it is not true that the women who have used the pill are just reaching postmenopausal age. my first wife, who is now 80, well past menopause, began using the pill in 1958 when it came on the market. so did many others who were not young unmarried but older married women who wanted a different way to prevent unwanted pregnancy. there are a large number of women who had used the pill for years who are now of the same , i guess one would call it old age. second; to say that the pill has hardly been improved over all these years is complete nonsense. both the dosages and the active chemical ingredient have been change numerous times. i will admit that the steroids used have similar actions, preventing a fertile ovum from developing and that the hormones have a deep-seated effect on the body, but use of a drug for 50 years by extremely large numbers of patients of a wide range of ages and of quite diverse populations is far more than needed to determine the general risks and side effects, of which for these drugs do exist. if one looks back at the history of drugs that have been removed from use, one can note that they were found wanting in a relatively few years. of course the pill probably has had the greatest effect on the actions of the human race that has ever been seen. in less than a generation, human interactions had taken a complete change. it may have been good or bad depending on the viewer, but it was certainly a mindblower that no one could foresee. apparently we still have not come to grips with it after all these years. i began working in 1958 with gregory pincus, who along with john rock were the real fathers of the pill. this was at the worcester foundation of experimental biology in shrewsbury MA. all the spade work had been done, the long-term clinical trails were complete and g.d. searle was just begi

Result(s) 3

Post a comment:

*Required Fields
Name*
Email*
  1. Please note:
  2. All comments require moderation by Powells.com staff.
  3. Comments submitted on weekends might take until Monday to appear.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram

  • Help
  • Guarantee
  • My Account
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Security
  • Wish List
  • Partners
  • Contact Us
  • Shipping
  • Transparency ACT MRF
  • Sitemap
  • © 2023 POWELLS.COM Terms